CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ7673518, ADJ7647749
Regular
Jan 23, 2015

ANA DE AYALA vs. AO-THE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION / CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and reversed a prior ruling, finding the applicant sustained industrial injury to her neck. While the applicant testified to injuring her neck in a workplace incident and this was partially corroborated, the Board found insufficient evidence for other claimed injuries. The Board specifically disagreed with the administrative law judge's credibility assessment concerning the neck injury itself, relying on medical reports and testimony supporting the neck injury claim. The Board affirmed the denial of claims for all other alleged injuries, finding insufficient medical evidence to link them to the incident.

Petition for ReconsiderationFindings and OrderIndustrial InjuryNeck InjuryBack InjurySpine InjuryUpper ExtremitiesPsycheGastroesophageal SystemInternal System
References
Case No. ADJ8026817
Regular
Apr 22, 2013

MARIA OCHOA vs. RANGERS DIE CASTING COMPANY, COMPWEST INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration of a decision finding the applicant sustained injury to her respiratory system and psyche AOE/COE. The WCAB rescinded the decision and returned the case to the trial level, finding the medical opinions of Dr. Lipper and Dr. Curtis lacked substantiality. Specifically, the physicians failed to provide clear diagnoses, quantify exposures, or adequately explain causation. The Board noted contradictory testimony from the applicant's supervisor and insufficient evidence to support the initial findings.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardMaria OchoaRangers Die Casting CompanyCOMPWEST INSURANCE COMPANYADJ8026817Los Angeles District OfficeOpinion and Order Granting ReconsiderationDecision After ReconsiderationFindings of FactWorkers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge (WCJ)
References
Case No. LAO 823855, LAO 823856
Regular
Oct 03, 2007

PEDRO M. RODRIGUEZ vs. RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY

The applicant sought reconsideration of a denial of workers' compensation benefits, which was based on the finding that his claims were filed after notice of termination. The Board affirmed the denial, concluding that the applicant's job abandonment led to a termination prior to the filing of his claims. The Board also determined that the employer properly denied both the specific and cumulative trauma claims, thus negating a presumption of compensability.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationFindings and OrderFindings of FactAdministrative Law JudgeApplicantDefendantRalphs Grocery CompanySecurity GuardIndustrial Injury
References
Case No. ADJ3133261 (VNO 0400017)
Regular
Aug 17, 2010

FELIPE TOLENTINO vs. CONCO CEMENT, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, XCHANGING INC., FREMONT COMPENSATION

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the lien claimant's petition for reconsideration as premature. The WCAB granted the defendant's petition for reconsideration regarding the temporary disability overpayment issue, deferring it for further proceedings. The Board affirmed the WCJ's findings on injury causation and permanent disability but amended the decision to clarify the overpayment issue. Finally, the WCAB issued a notice of intention to sanction defendant's counsel for attaching and citing unadmitted evidence.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardFELIPE TOLENTINOCONCO CEMENTCALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATIONXCHANGING INC.FREMONT COMPENSATIONliquidationADJ3133261VNO 0400017OPINION AND ORDERS DISMISSING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND GRANTING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION
References
Case No. ADJ8501790
Regular
Jul 29, 2015

Kelly Chase vs. St. Louis Blues Hockey Club, Federal Insurance Company

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) reversed a prior finding of industrial injury for a professional hockey player against the St. Louis Blues. The WCAB found insufficient connection to California for jurisdiction, citing the player's limited games in the state compared to his overall career. This decision followed the precedent set in *Federal Insurance Co. v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. (Johnson)*, which requires a legitimate and substantial connection to the state for jurisdiction. The WCAB concluded that 21 games out of 485 did not meet this standard for a cumulative injury claim.

WCABSt. Louis Blues Hockey ClubFederal Insurance CompanyADJ8501790Opinion and Decision After Reconsiderationcumulative industrial injuryprofessional hockey playersubject matter jurisdictionstatute of limitationssubstantial medical evidence
References
Case No. LAO 873064, LAO 875477
Regular
Feb 15, 2008

DIANA VASQUEZ vs. CHOICE ONE FOODS, ZURICH NORTH AMERICA

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and rescinded the prior decision, remanding the case to the trial level. The Board found that while the applicant's specific injury notification after termination was valid, the date of the claimed cumulative trauma injury was not determined, making it unclear if it was barred by post-termination claim defenses. Therefore, the case must be further developed to determine the date of injury and apply the relevant statutes.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardDiana VasquezChoice One FoodsZurich North Americanon-compensable injuriesaoe/coeright hand injuryright upper extremity injurypsyche injuryLabor Code section 3600(a)(10)
References
Case No. ADJ6655702
Regular
Mar 18, 2010

GERICK CATUGDA vs. WINKLEBLACK CONSTRUCTION, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE COMPANY c/o APPLIED RISK SERVICES

This case concerns whether the "going and coming rule" bars applicant's workers' compensation claim for injuries sustained during his commute. The defendant argued the rule applied, but the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied their petition for reconsideration. The Board adopted the WCJ's finding that the applicant's employment required him to have transportation for multiple job sites, creating an exception to the rule. This decision aligns with established precedent, where transportation necessity for the employer's benefit removes the commute from the rule's exclusion.

Going and coming ruleindustrial injuryconstruction laborerhead injurybrain injurypsyche injuryspine injuryribs injurypelvis injuryarms injury
References
Case No. ADJ3646270 (AHM 0108634)
Regular
Mar 20, 2009

GERLYNN GILLOGLY vs. KIMCO STAFFING SERVICES INC., LIBERTY MUTUAL

This case involves a workers' compensation applicant claiming injury in 1999. The defendant sought removal of an order that took the case off calendar, arguing years of delay and prejudice. However, the Appeals Board denied removal, finding that delays were partly due to the applicant's right to change attorneys. The Board concluded there was no irreparable harm to the defendant and that evidentiary objections could be addressed at trial.

GERLYNN GILLOGLYKIMCO STAFFING SERVICES INC.LIBERTY MUTUALADJ3646270AHM 0108634Petition for RemovalOrder Denying PetitionDeclaration of Readiness to ProceedQualified Medical EvaluationTelemarketer
References
Case No. ADJ9784410, ADJ9997593, ADJ9784413
Regular
Jul 18, 2018

JULIO V. JIMENEZ vs. CR & R, XL SPECIALTY INS.

This case involves Julio Jimenez's workers' compensation claims against CR&R for injuries sustained while employed as a driver. The Appeals Board rescinded the prior WCJ's decisions, finding that Jimenez's claims were not barred by Labor Code section 3600(a)(10), which generally prevents claims filed after termination. The Board found sufficient evidence that the employer had notice of or medical records documented the eye and finger injuries prior to termination, and that Jimenez reported the knee and foot injury from the truck fire to his supervisor. The matter was returned to the trial level for further proceedings and new decisions by the WCJ, as the record needed further development, particularly regarding medical causation and specific body parts claimed.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardLabor Code Section 3600(a)(10)post-termination claimscumulative traumaspecific injuryreconsiderationrescinded decisionsfurther proceedingsmedical recordsnotice of injury
References
Case No. ADJ11029299 ADJ10664592
Regular
May 03, 2018

KATHLEEN CAMPER vs. VAL VERDE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, PSI, administered by KEENAN \u0026 ASSOCIATES

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration, finding the applicant's initial timely filed claim for cumulative trauma injury should be amended to conform to proof of a specific back injury on May 5, 2016. The Board rescinded the judge's order finding the applicant took nothing and instead ordered the dismissal of the defendant's later-filed specific injury claim. The case is returned to the trial level for further proceedings on the amended claim.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationFindings and OrderAdministrative Law JudgeCustodianCumulative TraumaSpecific InjuryApplication for Adjudication of ClaimDue ProcessQualified Medical Examiner
References
Showing 1-10 of 11,335 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational