Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ8121071

Regular

Aug 19, 2016

BINH NGUYEN vs. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration, affirming the award of temporary total disability benefits. However, the Board amended the decision regarding permanent disability apportionment. The Board found Dr. Halbridge's opinion of 20% non-industrial apportionment for pre-existing cervical spondylosis to be substantial evidence. Consequently, the applicant's permanent disability was reduced to 13%, reflecting this apportionment.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationAmended Findings and AwardTemporary Total DisabilityPermanent DisabilityApportionmentQualified Medical Evaluator (PQME)Dr. Neil J. Halbridgeorthopedic surgerycumulative trauma

References

Case No. MISSING

Regular Panel Decision

Knight v. Astrue

Plaintiff Llewelyn M. Knight applied for disability insurance benefits (DIB), which were denied by the Commissioner of Social Security. Plaintiff sought judicial review, alleging disability due to herniated and bulging discs and cervical spondylosis. The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) initially denied the claim, finding Plaintiff not disabled and able to perform sedentary work. This court reviewed the ALJ's decision, addressing Plaintiff's arguments regarding impairment listings, residual functional capacity, the need for a vocational expert, credibility, and an independent medical examiner's opinion. Ultimately, the court found substantial evidence supporting the Commissioner's decision, granted the Commissioner's motion for judgment on the pleadings, and denied Plaintiff's motion, dismissing the case.

Disability BenefitsSocial Security ActSedentary WorkResidual Functional CapacityAdministrative Law JudgeMedical-Vocational GuidelinesCredibility AssessmentSpinal DisordersNerve Root CompressionMotor Loss

References

Case No. MISSING

Regular Panel Decision

Clemente v. Schweiker

The plaintiff initiated an action under 42 U.S.C. § 405 to appeal a final decision by the defendant, which had denied his application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits. An Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) previously concluded in May 1982 that the 62-year-old plaintiff, a longshoreman suffering from chronic bronchitis, emphysema, arthritis, and other severe conditions, was not disabled, deeming his impairments mild and resulting from the aging process. The District Judge found that the ALJ had misapplied 20 C.F.R. § 404.1521 by focusing on the plaintiff's ability to perform 'most jobs' rather than assessing whether his impairments significantly limited his ability to perform 'basic work activities,' such as lifting. Medical reports from treating physician Dr. Harold Coppersmith and consulting neurologist Dr. Stephen Gilbert consistently indicated the plaintiff's inability to perform heavy work and, in Dr. Gilbert's opinion, rendered him totally disabled due to conditions like cervical spondylosis, labyrinthine disturbance, and cervical radiculitis. Consequently, the case was remanded for further proceedings within 120 days, instructing the ALJ to properly consider the plaintiff's residual functional capacity, age, education, and past work experience as required by law.

Disability Insurance BenefitsSocial Security ActAdministrative Law JudgeSevere ImpairmentBasic Work ActivitiesResidual Functional CapacityLongshoremanCervical SpondylosisLabyrinthine DisturbanceVocational Factors

References

Showing 1-3 of 3 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

BINH NGUYEN vs. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

Knight v. Astrue

Clemente v. Schweiker