CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Moller v. North Shore University Hospital

This medical malpractice action involves plaintiff Moller suing Dr. David Levine and North Shore University Hospital after settling with original tortfeasors from an automobile accident. The defendants moved for summary judgment, asserting Moller had already received full compensation, including for alleged aggravation injuries, through two prior settlements. The court conducted a hearing to ascertain if the previous settlements, totaling $250,000 and $475,000, encompassed Moller's paraparesis, neurogenic bladder, and inability to walk. The court determined that Moller failed to demonstrate that the settlements did not include these aggravation injuries, and found both prior insurance companies had considered and included these conditions in their payouts. Consequently, the court granted summary judgment to Dr. Levine and North Shore University Hospital, dismissing the complaint in its entirety.

Medical MalpracticeSummary JudgmentSettlement AgreementsSuccessive TortfeasorsGeneral Obligations Law 15-108Aggravation of InjuriesParaparesisNeurogenic BladderAutomobile AccidentInsurance Policy Limits
References
8
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Rohlehr v. Brookdale University Hospital & Medical Center

Stanley Rohlehr sued Brookdale University Hospital and Medical Center alleging four claims: termination in violation of New York Labor Law § 740 and the Fair Labor Standards Act, breach of an employee handbook, and violation of public policy. Rohlehr was terminated after filing complaints with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) regarding union activities, followed by disciplinary notices for job performance issues. The NLRB dismissed his subsequent complaint, concluding termination was due to unsatisfactory performance. The Hospital moved for summary judgment. The court granted the Hospital's motion, dismissing all claims because the Labor Law § 740 claim did not involve public health or safety, the § 740 filing waived other contractual claims, the FLSA claim did not pertain to FLSA violations, and New York does not recognize a common law cause of action for abusive discharge.

WhistleblowerRetaliationWrongful TerminationSummary JudgmentLabor LawEmployee RightsEmployment ContractPublic PolicyNational Labor Relations BoardUnion Activities
References
23
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Perez v. Brookdale University Hospital & Medical Center

Eulalia Perez was admitted to Brookdale University Hospital on November 16, 2010, and treated for various medical conditions before being discharged on December 7. She died two days later. Her family, Ivan and Irma Perez, sued Brookdale and other defendants, alleging a violation of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) and state-law claims of wrongful death and negligence. The court granted Brookdale's motion for summary judgment on the EMTALA claim, determining that the hospital fulfilled its EMTALA duties once Mrs. Perez was stabilized, and any subsequent issues were outside the statute's scope. Consequently, the court declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state-law claims, leading to the dismissal of all claims against all parties.

EMTALAEmergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor ActMedical MalpracticeNegligenceWrongful DeathSummary JudgmentSupplemental JurisdictionPatient DumpingHospital DischargeFederal Question Jurisdiction
References
8
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Citron v. Staten Island University Hospital

The claimant, a respiratory therapist at Staten Island University Hospital, sustained an off-duty back injury in November 1991 and subsequently received disability benefits. In November 1992, the claimant was discharged for failing to provide documentation regarding her ongoing inability to return to work, despite repeated requests from her employer. She filed a complaint, alleging that her termination was in retaliation for filing a disability claim, in violation of Workers’ Compensation Law § 120. The Workers’ Compensation Board dismissed her complaint. The appellate court affirmed the Board's decision, concluding that there was substantial evidence to support the finding that her discharge was solely due to her failure to cooperate with the employer's documentation requests, not retaliatory intent.

Workers' Compensation LawRetaliatory DischargeDisability BenefitsEmployer RetaliationFailure to CooperateDocumentation RequestBoard Decision AppealAffirmed DecisionEmployee DischargeNew York Law
References
2
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

North Shore University Hospital v. Citibank Legal Service Intake Unit

North Shore University Hospital at Plainview (NSUHP) initiated a special proceeding seeking a turnover order to satisfy a $5,262.24 judgment against Kim Miscioscia, whose bank account was jointly held with Loretta H. LaRosa at Citibank. NSUHP failed to comply with CPLR 5222-a by not serving an exemption notice and claim forms with its restraining notice, and by commencing the turnover proceeding before the judgment debtor's 20-day period to claim exemptions had expired. The court ruled that judgment creditors must plead and prove compliance with CPLR 5222-a and the expiration of the exemption claim period before initiating a turnover proceeding. Consequently, the special proceeding was dismissed without prejudice, with leave for NSUHP to refile upon proper compliance.

Turnover OrderJudgment EnforcementCPLR 5222-aExemption NoticeRestraining NoticeJudgment Debtor RightsSpecial ProceedingBank AccountDismissal Without PrejudiceNew York Civil Practice
References
2
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Huntington Hospital v. Huntington Hospital Nurses' Ass'n

Huntington Hospital initiated an action under the Federal Arbitration Act to partially vacate an arbitration award, while the Huntington Hospital Nurses’ Association cross-petitioned to confirm it. The dispute originated from the Hospital unilaterally granting two nurses, Betty Evans and Lynn Meyer, longevity pay credits exceeding the ten-year cap stipulated in their collective bargaining agreement (CBA). The arbitrator found the Hospital violated the CBA's sections on pay and exclusive bargaining rights. The arbitrator mandated the Hospital roll back excess credits and recover overpayments. The District Court denied the Hospital's petition, dismissing arguments regarding public policy, manifest disregard for law, and lack of award finality, ultimately confirming the arbitration award.

Arbitration AwardCollective Bargaining AgreementLabor LawFederal Arbitration ActWage DisputesLongevity PayUnion RightsPublic Policy ExceptionManifest Disregard of LawContract Interpretation
References
22
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Palmer v. State University of New York Upstate Medical University

The claimant, an orthopedic hand surgeon, developed cervical radiculopathy and degenerative disc disease due to the physical strain of performing hand surgery and filed for workers' compensation benefits. His claim was controverted by the State University of New York Upstate Medical University and its carrier, as well as the Research Foundation of New York and its carrier. The Workers' Compensation Board determined that the claimant was a dual employee of both the University and the Foundation and that his condition constituted a causally related occupational disease. The University and its carrier appealed this decision. The appellate court affirmed the Board's findings, concluding there was substantial evidence to support both the dual employment status and the existence of a recognizable link between the claimant's condition and the distinctive features of his occupation.

Occupational DiseaseCervical RadiculopathyDegenerative Disc DiseaseDual EmploymentWorkers' Compensation BenefitsHand Surgery StrainMedical OpinionAppellate ReviewCausationEmployer Liability
References
8
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Apr 18, 1995

Penny v. Winthrop-University Hospital

Wan Sun Penny, a 53-year-old Korean nurse, sued Winthrop-University Hospital under Title VII, ADEA, and New York Human Rights Law, alleging discrimination based on race, national origin, and age, leading to her termination. The court addressed several pre-trial motions, denying Penny's motion to add a retaliation claim based on a conditional reinstatement offer and granting the hospital's motion to dismiss this claim. However, the court denied the hospital's motions to dismiss Penny's claims for compensatory and punitive damages under Title VII and her claims of continuing discrimination. Additionally, the court granted the hospital's motion to exclude certain letters and a memorandum related to settlement negotiations as evidence under Fed.R.Evid. 408.

Employment DiscriminationAge DiscriminationRace DiscriminationNational Origin DiscriminationRetaliation ClaimWrongful TerminationPre-Trial MotionsEvidence ExclusionSettlement NegotiationsCivil Rights Act of 1964
References
20
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

League of Voluntary Hospitals & Homes v. Local 1199, Drug, Hospital & Health Care Workers Union

The court addresses an application for a preliminary injunction against Local 1199, a union planning a three-day strike. The League of Voluntary Hospitals and Homes of N. Y. sought the injunction following a previous temporary restraining order concerning a one-day strike. The union argued that each planned strike required a new legal proceeding, but the court deemed the strikes "episodic and organically connected." Citing concerns about blocked ingress/egress to hospitals and the union president's threats to "shut down" facilities, the judge found a preliminary injunction necessary under Labor Law § 807 to protect public health and safety. The injunction restrains the union from unlawfully interfering with hospital operations, blocking access, and picketing within certain distances of hospital entrances and emergency rooms.

Labor DisputePreliminary InjunctionStrike ActionUnion ActivityHospital AccessPicketing RegulationsCollective BargainingCivil Disobedience ThreatPublic Health and SafetyIngress Egress Interference
References
1
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Mendelsohn v. University Hospital

Barry Mendelsohn sued University Hospital and Dennis Sheppard for retaliation and discrimination. He alleged Sheppard failed to promote him in retaliation for union complaints, violating 42 U.S.C. § 1988. He also claimed the Hospital discriminated based on sex and retaliated by removing teaching duties after he filed a sex discrimination charge, violating Title VII and NYHRL. Defendants moved to dismiss. The court granted dismissal of the § 1983 retaliation claim against Sheppard and the Title VII sex discrimination claim (with leave to amend regarding qualification), and the NYHRL claims. However, the court denied dismissal of the Title VII retaliation claim against the Hospital, finding that diminished teaching responsibilities constituted an adverse employment action.

Employment DiscriminationRetaliationTitle VIISex DiscriminationFailure to PromoteAdverse Employment ActionFederal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6)42 U.S.C. Section 1983First AmendmentMotion to Dismiss
References
23
Showing 1-10 of 1,561 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational