CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ1906750 (OAK 0339121) ADJ7499032
Regular
Aug 15, 2013

MARY FISHER vs. MET LIFE INSURANCE, NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY

The Appeals Board granted the applicant's Petition for Removal to rescind the WCJ's order closing discovery and continuing the case to trial. The WCJ erred by converting a status conference into a mandatory settlement conference without adequate notice to the applicant, thereby unfairly precluding her from obtaining a required vocational expert report. Since the applicant did not expect discovery to close at the initial status conference, the Appeals Board returned the matter for a proper MSC and further proceedings.

Petition for RemovalVocational expert reportMandatory Settlement ConferenceDiscovery closureIndustrial injuryLabor Code section 5502(d)(3)Grupe Company v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.Labor Code section 5703(j)Due diligenceStatus conference
References
1
Case No. ADJ845033 (VNO 0407336) ADJ1911914 (VNO 0412063) ADJ1461680 (VNO 0338656) ADJ2866384 (VNO 0338654) ADJ451885 (MON 0224886) ADJ1364506 (VNO 0407335) ADJ2640142 (VNO 0407334) ADJ1480083 (MON 0264343)
Regular
Apr 04, 2012

DONALD RENETZKY vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

This case involves a defendant's petition for removal concerning potential discovery closure under Labor Code section 5502(e)(3). The defendant argues prejudice due to unresolved discovery issues related to applicant's home health care services claim, particularly regarding an increase in prescribed hours. The Appeals Board granted removal, deeming the prior conference a status/discovery conference. This allows for completion of discovery to facilitate a just resolution and prevent prejudice to the defendant.

Petition for RemovalDiscovery ClosureLabor Code Section 5502(e)(3)Pretrial Conference StatementMandatory Settlement ConferenceHome Health Care ServicesAgreed Medical ExaminerTreating PhysicianHome Health Care EvaluatorDeposition
References
1
Case No. ADJ16491268; ADJ15884384; ADJ16161110; ADJ16161057; ADJ16161093; ADJ15760386; ADJ18891808; ADJ19153721; ADJ16116250
Significant

Steve Hoddinott, et al. vs. Bravo Security Services, Inc.; National Liability Fire Ins. Co., administered by Biberk Business Insurance, et al.

The Appeals Board issued a notice to set a status conference to assist the parties in further discussing their stipulations with a designated hearing officer.

En BancRemovalStipulationSupplemental BriefingStatus ConferenceHearing OfficerDeputy CommissionerAppeals BoardAdjudication NumbersBravo Security Services
References
0
Case No. ADJ542950
Regular
May 12, 2009

LANCE TURNER vs. ALL PAYMENT SERVICES, AIG

This case concerns two petitions for removal filed by the applicant, Lance Turner, against All Payment Services and AIG. Turner sought to close discovery at a mandatory settlement conference and obtain a protective order against the defendant's discovery efforts. The Appeals Board denied both petitions, finding the WCJ's reasoning sound. However, the Board recommended a status conference to address discovery disputes and expedite the case towards trial.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for RemovalMandatory Settlement ConferenceDiscoveryProtective OrderWCJOff Calendar StatusStatus ConferenceDepositionTrial Level
References
0
Case No. ADJ4639631 (MON 0327478)
Regular
Nov 08, 2012

MARY JONES vs. UCLA MEDICAL CENTER, SEDGWICK, CMS

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the defendant's Petition for Removal, finding that the judge improperly continued the case to trial after a status conference without defendant's agreement. The Board rescinded the judge's order, stating that a mandatory settlement conference (MSC) is required after a status conference unless parties agree otherwise. The case is returned for further proceedings, including setting a new MSC, with discovery remaining open to allow the defendant to complete its investigation.

Petition for RemovalWCJStatus ConferenceMandatory Settlement ConferenceDiscoveryOff CalendarLabor Code Section 5502(e)(3)WCAB Rule 10301(dd)Pretrial Conference StatementDeclarations of Readiness to Proceed
References
2
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

New York State Teamsters Conference Pension and Retirement Fund v. DOREN AVE. ASSOCIATES, INC.

The case involves the New York State Teamsters Conference Pension and Retirement Fund pursuing withdrawal liability payments from Doren Avenue Associates, Inc., Express Services, LLC, and S & P Trucking, LLC. The Fund alleged these defendants were under common control with or alter egos of Howard’s Express, Inc., a company previously obligated to the Fund. The court ruled that determining the defendants' "employer status" under the MPPAA was a matter for judicial decision, not arbitration. It denied the Fund's motion for summary judgment due to insufficient evidence on the common control and alter ego claims against Express and S&P. Conversely, the court granted the summary judgment motion for Express Services, LLC, and S & P Trucking, LLC, dismissing the complaint against them and terminating related arbitration proceedings, while granting a default judgment against Doren Avenue Associates, Inc.

Pension Withdrawal LiabilityMPPAAERISACommon Control DoctrineAlter Ego LiabilitySummary Judgment MotionFederal Court JurisdictionArbitration TerminationCorporate Ownership StructureEmployee Benefit Plans
References
27
Case No. ADJ803080 (LBO 0386412)
Regular
Mar 16, 2009

ANDRES SANCHEZ JUARES (Dec'd.), EVER REYES CARILLO (App.) vs. FANG CLOTHING, INC., INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST GROUP/EXPLORER

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied a petition for reconsideration from an insurer but granted removal of the case. The WCAB found that the administrative law judge (ALJ) improperly scheduled a trial conference when a status conference was requested to address discovery issues. This procedural error would cause prejudice and irreparable harm by forcing parties to trial prematurely without adequate discovery or settlement opportunity. Consequently, the WCAB rescinded the ALJ's order and returned the case for further proceedings.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationRemovalStatus ConferenceMandatory Settlement ConferenceLabor Code Section 5502Declaration of ReadinessPre-trial Conference StatementDiscovery IssuesStipulations
References
0
Case No. ADJ3589881 (SBR0186633) ADJ2907298 (SBR0185776)
Regular
Mar 14, 2017

THEODORE MOULAS vs. SDA TRANSPORTATION, SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA

The defendant sought removal, challenging the WCJ's order to reopen discovery after trial had begun. The Appeals Board initially dismissed the removal petition as moot, believing the discovery dispute was resolved. However, the defendant asserted the dispute remained unresolved, prompting the Board to grant a new petition for removal. The Board rescinded its prior dismissal, denied the original removal petition without prejudice, and ordered the WCJ to hold an expeditious status conference to clarify the case's status and facilitate resolution.

Petition for RemovalDiscovery DisputeMandatory Settlement ConferenceReopening DiscoveryGood CauseIrreparable HarmMoot PetitionRescind OrderStatus ConferenceExpiditious Resolution
References
2
Case No. ADJ8723834
Regular
Aug 08, 2013

DAVID LIPARI vs. BENNETT MOTOR EXPRESS, LLC, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE CO.

The Board dismissed the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration because the WCJ's discovery order was not a final decision. However, the Board granted removal and rescinded the WCJ's order compelling discovery. This action was taken to ensure the defendant had proper due process, as they claimed insufficient notice of the discovery motion and insufficient time to respond. The Board also noted that the disputed employment status impacts the relevance of the requested documents, suggesting a priority conference on employment should be held first.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationPetition for RemovalDiscovery OrderSubpoena Duces TecumDue ProcessIndependent ContractorSubstitution of AttorneysMotion to CompelMedical Provider Network
References
5
Case No. ADJ9743499 ADJ10108398
Regular
Oct 01, 2018

JOHN MCGEE vs. CITY OF VACAVILLE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted defendant City of Vacaville's Petition for Removal, rescinding the prior order that closed discovery and set a trial date. The Board found that closing discovery prematurely would cause significant prejudice to the defendant. This decision stems from the defendant's ongoing, diligent efforts to conduct further discovery, specifically deposing a physician who relocated, while also pursuing global settlement options that included a related civil claim. The case is returned to the trial level for a status conference to determine future proceedings.

Petition for RemovalWCABWCJDiscovery ClosurePrejudiceIrreparable HarmQME PanelDegenerative Disc DiseaseAcromioclavicular ArthritisGlenohumeral Arthritis
References
0
Showing 1-10 of 2,950 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational