CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ3133261 (VNO 0400017)
Regular
Aug 17, 2010

FELIPE TOLENTINO vs. CONCO CEMENT, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, XCHANGING INC., FREMONT COMPENSATION

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the lien claimant's petition for reconsideration as premature. The WCAB granted the defendant's petition for reconsideration regarding the temporary disability overpayment issue, deferring it for further proceedings. The Board affirmed the WCJ's findings on injury causation and permanent disability but amended the decision to clarify the overpayment issue. Finally, the WCAB issued a notice of intention to sanction defendant's counsel for attaching and citing unadmitted evidence.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardFELIPE TOLENTINOCONCO CEMENTCALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATIONXCHANGING INC.FREMONT COMPENSATIONliquidationADJ3133261VNO 0400017OPINION AND ORDERS DISMISSING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND GRANTING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION
References
Case No. ADJ651477 (VNO 0522310)
Regular
Jun 24, 2010

ANGELA MORENO vs. CITY OF GLENDALE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted petitions for reconsideration filed by both the applicant and the defendant. This action was taken due to statutory time constraints and an initial review of the record indicating a need for further study of the factual and legal issues. The Board requires additional time to thoroughly understand the record and issue a just decision.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationCity of GlendalePermissibly Self-InsuredStatutory Time ConstraintsFactual IssuesLegal IssuesDecision After ReconsiderationOffice of the CommissionersFrank M. Brass
References
Case No. ADJ7773341
Regular
Mar 20, 2014

KELVIN HUNTER vs. SAN JOSE SABERCATS, ZURICH NORTH AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY

A Petition for Removal was filed in this workers' compensation case. The petitioner subsequently withdrew the petition. Consequently, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board has ordered the Petition for Removal dismissed. No further action will be taken on the withdrawn petition.

Petition for RemovalWithdrawn PetitionDismissed PetitionWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardSan Jose SabercatsZurich North America Insurance CompanySedgwickADJ7773341Anaheim District OfficeFrank M. Brass
References
Case No. ADJ7050497, ADJ7050515
Regular
Sep 09, 2014

Antonio Ramirez Martinez vs. Universe Project Management, First Comp Insurance Agency

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed Antonio Ramirez Martinez's petition for reconsideration. The WCAB adopted the administrative law judge's report, which found the petition to be untimely and "skeletal." Consequently, the petition was formally dismissed. This ruling means the prior decision on the case remains in effect without further review by the Board.

Petition for ReconsiderationDismissalUntimelySkeletalWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardAdministrative Law JudgeReport and RecommendationADJ7050497ADJ7050515Los Angeles District Office
References
Case No. ADJ7522095
Regular
May 22, 2014

EUGENIA GRANADOS vs. HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS USA, INC., TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed Eugenia Granados' Petition for Reconsideration. The WCAB adopted and incorporated the reasoning of the administrative law judge's Report and Recommendation. No specific reasons for dismissal are detailed in this order. The dismissal was issued on May 22, 2014.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationDismissalReport and RecommendationAdministrative Law JudgeHarbor Freight Tools USAInc.Travelers Property Casualty CompanyEugenia GranadosADJ7522095
References
Case No. ADJ7020173
Regular
Oct 18, 2010

ISABEL PARADA vs. CAMBRIAN HOME CARE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied reconsideration in the case of Isabel Parada v. Cambrian Home Care. The Board adopted the reasoning of the workers' compensation administrative law judge's report. The decision to deny reconsideration is based on a review of the record.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardIsabel ParadaCambrian Home CarePermissibly Self-InsuredOrder Denying ReconsiderationPetition for ReconsiderationWorkers' compensation administrative law judgeWCJReportRecord
References
Case No. ADJ8880599 MF ADJ8880684
Regular
Oct 09, 2014

JAMES COOLEY vs. HIBSHMAN TRADING CORPORATION, MARKEL SERVICES

This case involves a petition for reconsideration filed by applicant James Cooley challenging a prior decision. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board has granted this petition. The Board finds it necessary to grant reconsideration to thoroughly review the factual and legal issues involved. This action will allow for a more complete understanding of the record and a just decision. Further proceedings may be held as deemed appropriate.

Petition for ReconsiderationWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardHibshman Trading CorporationMarkel ServicesADJ8880599ADJ8880684Los Angeles District OfficeDecision After ReconsiderationElectronic Adjudication Management SystemOffice of the Commissioners
References
Case No. ADJ7431457
Regular
Jan 23, 2014

NANCY NUNES vs. DILLON MOBILE HOME CLUB, INC., FIRST COMPENSATION INSURANCE

In this case, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the lien claimant's Petition for Reconsideration. The dismissal was due to the petition being filed outside the statutory deadline. Specifically, the petition was filed more than 25 days after the Findings & Order was issued on November 5, 2013, making it untimely.

Petition for ReconsiderationUntimelyLabor Code section 5903Code of Civil Procedure section 1013Findings & OrderLien claimantDismissalWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardAdministrative law judgeReport and Recommendation
References
Case No. ADJ118892 (VNO 0442877) ADJ1041834 (VNO 0436039)
Regular

TAMARA O'KEEFE vs. COSTCO WHOLESALE, INC.

This order denies Costco Wholesale's petition for reconsideration in the workers' compensation case of Tamara O'Keefe. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) adopted the report of the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) as its reasoning for denial. The specific grounds for denial are detailed within the WCJ's report, which is incorporated by reference. Therefore, the WCAB has upheld the prior decision and denied the employer's request for review.

ADJ118892VNO 0442877ADJ1041834VNO 0436039O'KeefeCostco WholesaleSedgwick CMSDeny ReconsiderationWCJ ReportAppeals Board
References
Case No. ADJ2496388 (AHM 0127594)
Regular
Nov 02, 2009

Janie Stuart vs. OWENS ILLINOIS; Permissibly SelfInsured, Administered by GALLAGHER BASSETT

Attorney's fees and costs granted to Janie Stuart's attorney, Ullasini Joy Dholakia, in the amount of $2,100.00 and $116.20 respectively.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardLabor Code Section 5801Supplemental Attorney's FeesPetition for Writ of ReviewReasonable Attorney's FeesCostsOwens IllinoisGallagher BassettUllasini Joy DholakiaDholakia & Associates
References
Showing 1-10 of 80 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational