CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

European American Bank v. Strab Construction Corp.

The plaintiff-appellant filed a motion to resettle a prior decision from April 5, 1993, seeking to substitute Marla Strow for the deceased defendant Jerome Strow and to include prejudgment interest in the judgment. The court denied the substitution motion without prejudice, directing an application to the Surrogate's Court and then a motion in the Supreme Court. However, the branch of the motion concerning prejudgment interest was granted, leading to the recall and vacation of the original April 5, 1993 decision, and the substitution of the present decision and order. In this new decision, the appeal against Jerome Strow was dismissed, and the order pertaining to him was vacated because he died before the summary judgment motion was decided. Conversely, the court reversed the prior order concerning defendants Strab Construction Corp. and Gary Rabinowitz, granting summary judgment to the plaintiff for $1,205,000, and remitting the case for the calculation of prejudgment interest and attorney fees.

Promissory NotesSummary JudgmentPrejudgment InterestSubstitution of PartiesDeceased DefendantStatute of FraudsOral AgreementAppellate ProcedureCivil ProcedureNassau County
References
8
Case No. ADJ1504028 (AHM 0081465); ADJ603748 (AHM 0081464)
Regular
Oct 09, 2025

JENNIFER DICORATO vs. BLOOMFIELD BAKERY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION

The case involves a petition for removal filed by lien claimant Stuart Silverman, M.D., challenging an order by a Workers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge (WCJ). The WCJ's order permitted the defendant to substitute a bill review expert witness and allow remote testimony. The Appeals Board, after reviewing the petition, defendant's answer, and the WCJ's report, dismissed the petition. The Board concluded that the issue was not yet ripe for adjudication as no final order or decision regarding the expert witness substitution or remote testimony had been issued by the WCJ. The decision further noted the importance of a complete record and admonished the lien claimant's representative, Dan Escamilla, for misrepresenting facts in the verified petition for removal.

Petition for RemovalLien ClaimantSubstitution of Expert WitnessRemote TestimonyWCJ DecisionNot Ripe for AdjudicationPretrial Conference StatementSubstantial EvidenceAdmitted EvidenceSanctions
References
4
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Bell Aircraft Corp. v. Siegler

The court affirmed both the final and intermediate orders without costs in this matter. The case primarily involved an appeal from an order that had found several defendants guilty of criminal contempt of court. Additionally, the appeal also addressed an order which denied a motion seeking to resettle an order of commitment. Furthermore, a motion to vacate and perpetually stay the orders of commitment was also denied. All presiding judges concurred with the decision.

Criminal ContemptOrder of CommitmentResettlement MotionVacate MotionStay OrdersAppellate ReviewOrder AffirmedJudicial Concurrence
References
1
Case No. SAC 261644
Regular
Sep 18, 2007

ALAN SHANNON vs. CHIEF AUTO PARTS, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for HIH INSURANCE, INTERCARE INSURANCE SERVICES

This case involves a clerical error in the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board's August 27, 2007 Order, which incorrectly identified the party who petitioned for reconsideration. The Board rescinds that incorrect order and substitutes a corrected one. The corrected order clarifies that the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration was denied.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardClerical ErrorPetition for ReconsiderationOpinion and OrderTemporary Disability IndemnityFindings of Fact and AwardAdministrative Law JudgeGranting ReconsiderationDenying PetitionRescinded
References
0
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Oct 03, 2011

Casas v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.

This case concerns an appeal of an order from the Supreme Court, New York County, regarding a conditional preclusion order issued in October 2006. The defendant's answer was deemed stricken due to their failure to comply with discovery requirements within 30 days, making the order self-executing. The court found that the defendant failed to provide a reasonable excuse for non-compliance or a meritorious defense. The order was modified to prevent the plaintiff from litigating an accident-related disability claim subsequent to September 5, 2008, citing a preclusive Workers’ Compensation Board decision. The Appellate Division panel unanimously concurred with the modified decision, affirming the striking of the defendant's answer while imposing a limitation on the plaintiff's disability claims.

Discovery SanctionsConditional Preclusion OrderWorkers' Compensation BoardAccident-related DisabilitySummary JudgmentDefault JudgmentMeritorious DefenseSelf-Executing OrderAppellate DivisionNew York Law
References
4
Case No. ADJ8150716
Regular
Apr 29, 2013

CHRIS ARCE vs. PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, SEDGWICK CMS

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration because the order setting trial was interlocutory, not final. The WCAB granted removal of the order, finding applicant was denied due process by lack of notice for a status conference. Consequently, the WCAB rescinded the order setting trial and substituted an order converting the trial date to a mandatory settlement conference. This decision aims to address potential prejudice to the applicant and promote judicial economy.

Workers Compensation Appeals BoardPacific Bell Telephone CompanySedgwick CMSADJ8150716Supplemental Petition for ReconsiderationDeclaration of Readiness to ProceedWCJ OrderThird Party CreditDue ProcessMandatory Settlement Conference
References
11
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Dubinsky v. Joseph Love, Inc.

A motion seeking an order to affirm a prior order and judgment and to vacate a previous determination and order of the court was considered and denied by the judicial panel. The panel included Justices Martin, Townley, Callahan, and Peck.

Motion PracticeOrder AffirmanceJudgment AffirmancePrior DeterminationOrder VacaturJudicial Panel DecisionAppellate Review
References
1
Case No. ADJ9348874
Regular
Jun 16, 2015

SUYAPA ORELLANA vs. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of an Order Approving Compromise and Release due to a mutual mistake of fact concerning permanent disability advances. The Board found that the original order failed to account for additional permanent disability advances made after December 4, 2011, as contemplated by the Compromise and Release agreement. Consequently, the Board rescinded the prior order and substituted an amended order that correctly allows credit for all permanent disability advances made after that date. The Board also addressed procedural issues regarding the timeliness and proper verification of the defendant's petition.

Petition for ReconsiderationCompromise and ReleaseOrder Approving Compromise and Releasetemporary disability indemnitypermanent disability advancesmutual mistake of factReport and RecommendationLabor Code § 5909statutory time limitstolling
References
2
Case No. ADJ2077858 (OAK 332331)
Regular
Oct 14, 2009

GERARDO SANCHEZ-GRIMALDO vs. TWE ENTERPRISES, INC., SEABRIGHT INSURANCE COMPANY

Defendant sought reconsideration of a monetary sanction. The WCJ's report recommended granting the petition, vacating the sanctions, and ordering defendant to pay fees and release withheld indemnity. Reconsideration was granted, the prior order was rescinded, and a new order was substituted.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardMonetary SanctionsLabor Code section 5813Notice of IntentionTemporary DisabilityPetition to TerminateIndustrial InjuryCarpenterRight KneeDue Process
References
1
Case No. ADJ4522242 (VNO 0452421) ADJ522765 (VNO 0452422)
Regular
May 26, 2011

PAUL ALLGOOD vs. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted lien claimant's petition for removal to rescind an Administrative Law Judge's order compelling Dr. Baden's appearance at trial. The Board found no good cause was established for Dr. Baden's direct examination and that the order was not a final, appealable decision. Removal was granted to prevent prejudice to the lien claimant, and the order for Dr. Baden's appearance was rescinded. The Board also dismissed the lien claimant's prior petition for reconsideration.

Lien ClaimantPetition for ReconsiderationPetition for RemovalWCJ OrderDr. Scott BadenGood CauseMedical WitnessDirect ExaminationWritten ReportsBoard Rule 10606
References
11
Showing 1-10 of 24,099 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational