CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ918266 (SFO 0488680), ADJ569020 (SFO 0488681), ADJ977111 (SFO 0488682), ADJ182039 (SFO 0413989)
Regular
Feb 19, 2015

ROBERT ROGERS vs. ALBERTSON'S/SUPERVALU, Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered By SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.

This case involves multiple workers' compensation claims filed by Robert Rogers against Albertson's/Supervalu. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board has issued an order dismissing the petitioner's Petition for Removal. This dismissal is solely due to the petitioner having withdrawn their own petition. Therefore, the Board is acting to formally close the removal process as requested.

Petition for RemovalWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardDismissedWithdrawnCase NumbersAlbertson'sSupervaluSedgwick Claims Management ServicesPermissibly Self-InsuredApplicant
References
0
Case No. ADJ9757218, ADJ10058696
Regular
Aug 21, 2017

MICHAEL GUILLOT vs. ALBERTSONS SUPERVALUE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration of an Amended Order Approving Compromise and Release. The applicant alleged the settlement was procured by fraud, claiming he was intimidated and forced to sign without reviewing it. However, the Board found no evidence or testimony under oath was presented to support these allegations. Consequently, the Board recommended the petition be treated as a request to set aside the order, requiring a hearing for the applicant to present evidence.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationCompromise and ReleaseFraudDuressUndue InfluenceProcedural IrregularitiesGood CauseRescind OrderStipulation
References
8
Case No. ADJ3902250 (LAO 0888565)
Regular
Sep 10, 2009

FALEULA SEIULI vs. SAVE-A-LOT/SUPERVALU, INC.; OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE administered by RISK MANAGEMENT

The Appeals Board granted the defendant's petition for removal, rescinding the WCJ's order to develop the record. The applicant failed to obtain a valid medical evaluation compliant with Labor Code sections 4060 and 4062.2 regarding an industrial injury claim. The Board found the applicant waived her right to such an evaluation due to inaction and a strategic decision at trial. Consequently, the case is returned to the WCJ to decide the merits based solely on the existing record.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardRemovalOrder to Develop the RecordOff CalendarAdmissible EvidenceIndustrial InjuryPsycheHigh Blood PressurePretrial Conference StatementLabor Code 4600
References
1
Showing 1-3 of 3 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational