CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Castro v. Salem Truck Leasing, Inc.

The defendants, Salem Truck Leasing, Inc., and Jose E. Cofresi, appealed an order denying their motion for summary judgment in a personal injury action. The plaintiff was a passenger in a truck operated by Cofresi and owned by Salem, and both were co-employees involved in an accident during their employment. The appeals court modified the order, granting summary judgment dismissing the complaint against Cofresi, citing Workers' Compensation Law co-employee immunity. However, the court affirmed the denial of summary judgment for Salem Truck Leasing, Inc., as a triable issue of fact existed regarding Salem's alleged independent negligence in maintaining the truck.

Personal InjurySummary JudgmentWorkers' Compensation LawCo-employee ImmunityVehicle AccidentTruck LeasingNegligenceAppellate ReviewMotion PracticeKings County
References
4
Case No. ADJ8256480
Regular
Oct 23, 2014

BRIAN RIECK vs. TCI TRUCK LEASING, SAFETY NATIONAL CASUALTY, MATRIX ABSENCE MANAGEMENT, INC.

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed a Petition for Reconsideration as untimely because it was filed more than 25 days after the Order Dismissing Lien. Even if considered on its merits, the petition would have been denied as recommended by the administrative law judge. The applicant in this case is Brian Rieck, and the defendants are TCI Truck Leasing and Safety National Casualty. The matter arose from case number ADJ8256480 in the Santa Ana District Office.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationUntimely PetitionDismissal OrderLien ClaimantWCJ Report and RecommendationLabor Code Section 5903WCAB Rule 10507TCI Truck LeasingSafety National Casualty
References
0
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

JARMATT TRUCK LEAS. CORP. v. Brooklyn Pie Co., Inc.

Plaintiffs, Jarmatt Truck Leasing Corporation, sought relief under the Sherman Antitrust Act against defendants Brooklyn Pie Company, Inc., Mrs. Smith’s Frozen Foods Co., and Benchmark Baking Corporation. Jarmatt alleged financial harm from their failure to acquire Brooklyn Pie's assets, including exclusive distribution rights for Mrs. Smith’s pies, claiming the defendants conspired to stifle competition and monopolize the market. The Court addressed the defendants' motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The Court ultimately granted the dismissal, reasoning that the complaint failed to allege injury to competition, only to a competitor, and lacked essential elements for claims under both Section 1 and Section 2 of the Sherman Act, such as defining a relevant market or demonstrating an intent to monopolize. Additionally, the Court noted the absence of complete diversity for non-antitrust claims, preventing federal jurisdiction over those matters.

AntitrustSherman ActDismissalMonopolyCompetitionDistribution RightsAsset AcquisitionPleading StandardsFederal CourtMotion to Dismiss
References
11
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Albany Truck Rental Service, Inc. v. New Hampshire Merchants Insurance

This case involves an appeal from a declaratory judgment action to determine insurance coverage obligations following a fatal tractor-trailer accident. The accident killed Michael L. Bennekin, a passenger and co-employee of the driver, David L. Sinnamon, both employed by the NYS Department of Correctional Services, which had leased the tractor from Albany Truck. Travelers insured Albany Truck, while Merchants insured the Department. Bennekin's estate initially sued Sinnamon, Albany Truck, and General Tire. Sinnamon was dismissed due to workers' compensation exclusivity, insulating Albany Truck from vicarious liability for Sinnamon's negligence but not its own independent negligence. The court affirmed the Special Term's ruling that Travelers is the primary insurer and Merchants is the secondary/excess insurer for Albany Truck's independent negligence. However, the court reversed the Special Term's decision to refer attorneys' fees for factual determination, concluding that no fees could be allowed as Sinnamon did not incur them to the Attorney-General.

Insurance coveragePrimary and excess insuranceDuty to defendWorkers' Compensation LawCo-employee defenseDeclaratory judgmentVicarious liabilityIndependent negligenceMotor vehicle accidentBreach of contract
References
10
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Cruz v. Regent Leasing Ltd. Partnership

Plaintiff Roberto Cruz commenced an action against Regent Leasing Limited Partnership for personal injuries sustained during a slip and fall. Cruz, a superintendent, was an employee of Mid-State Management Corp., hired by Regent Leasing to manage the property. Defendant Regent Leasing moved for summary judgment, arguing that the exclusivity of workers' compensation benefits precluded the action, suggesting plaintiff should be deemed their employee. The court denied the motion, finding no employer-employee or co-employer relationship between Cruz and Regent Leasing. The decision clarified that merely hiring an employer to manage premises does not establish an employer-employee relationship within the Workers’ Compensation Law.

Slip and FallPersonal InjuryWorkers' Compensation LawExclusive RemedySummary JudgmentEmployer-Employee RelationshipCo-EmployerManaging AgentLandowner LiabilityPremises Liability
References
17
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Jan 22, 1999

Ma v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.

The defendants, Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., and Zhidong Wu, appealed from an order denying summary judgment to Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. The plaintiff cross-appealed from the same order, which granted summary judgment dismissing the action against Zhidong Wu. The appellate court dismissed Zhidong Wu's appeal on the grounds that he was not aggrieved by the provision. The court affirmed the order denying summary judgment to Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., finding it failed to establish its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law regarding its alleged negligent maintenance. The plaintiff's cause of action against Zhidong Wu and any vicarious liability claim against Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., for Zhidong Wu's negligence were barred by the Workers’ Compensation Law.

Automobile accidentPersonal injurySummary judgmentNegligenceVicarious liabilityWorkers' CompensationAppellate reviewCross-appealJudicial dismissalOrder affirmed
References
6
Case No. ADJ9001768
Regular
Apr 04, 2019

ERNESTO LANGARICA vs. PENSKE TRUCK LEASING, OLD REPUBLIC GENERAL INSURANCE

This case concerns defendant Penske Truck Leasing's attempt to claim a credit against future workers' compensation benefits owed to applicant Ernesto Langarica. The applicant settled a civil lawsuit arising from an industrial injury, and the defendant had filed a lien in that civil case. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) rescinded the prior finding and returned the case for further proceedings, holding that the settlement of the defendant's lien in the civil case did not automatically waive their right to claim a credit. The WCAB emphasized that the release language did not expressly waive the credit claim, and applicant's understanding of the settlement did not create a "warranted belief" of such a waiver. Further hearings are required to determine negligence and the final credit amount.

Third-party recoveryLien settlementCredit rightsLabor Code sections 3858 and 3861Joint Findings and OrderPetition for ReconsiderationStipulations and Request for AwardRelease of claimsWCJ Opinion on DecisionEmployer negligence
References
19
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Farrington v. Bovis Lend Lease LMB, Inc.

Plaintiff Gerard Farrington sustained personal injuries while unloading wooden planks from a flatbed truck at a construction site managed by Bovis Lend Lease LMB, Inc. and owned by Columbia University. The planks, supplied and loaded by Feldman Lumber, fell and struck him. Farrington filed a lawsuit alleging common-law negligence and violations of Labor Law sections 200, 240(1), and 241(6), as well as Vehicle and Traffic Law section 388(1). The Supreme Court denied motions for summary judgment by both the Bovis and Feldman defendants. The appellate court affirmed the Supreme Court's order, concluding that material issues of fact existed regarding the applicability of Labor Law § 240(1) and common-law negligence claims.

Personal InjuryConstruction SafetyFalling MaterialsSummary Judgment MotionLabor Law Section 240(1)Vehicle and Traffic Law Section 388(1)Common-Law NegligenceAppellate DecisionPremises LiabilityDuty of Care
References
10
Case No. CA 12-02386
Regular Panel Decision
Nov 08, 2013

PRICE TRUCKING CORP. v. AAA ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.

Price Trucking Corp. (plaintiff-respondent) commenced an action alleging that First Niagara Bank, N.A. (defendant-appellant) violated Lien Law article 3-A by automatically transferring funds from AAA Environmental, Inc.'s operational account into its line of credit account, which Price Trucking claimed constituted a diversion of Lien Law trust assets. The Supreme Court granted Price Trucking's motion for partial summary judgment, finding First Niagara liable as a Lien Law statutory trustee and that it had both actual and constructive notice of the diversion. The Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department, modified the order, denying Price Trucking's motion in its entirety. It concluded that First Niagara was not a statutory trustee under the facts and that the Supreme Court erred in applying a constructive notice standard, asserting that only actual notice is applicable to banks for the holder in due course defense under Lien Law § 72 (1).

Lien LawTrust AssetsHolder in Due CourseActual NoticeConstructive NoticeUniform Commercial CodeLender LiabilitySubcontractorsSummary JudgmentAppeal
References
10
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Lumpkin v. Albany Truck Rental Service, Inc.

This case concerns three related actions stemming from a truck accident that resulted in the death of the plaintiff's decedent, who was a passenger. Both the decedent and the driver, David L. Sinnamon, were employed by the New York State Department of Correctional Services, and the accident occurred during their employment. The original plaintiff sued General Tire and Rubber Company, Albany Truck Rental Service, Inc., and Sinnamon. Sinnamon was dismissed based on the Workers' Compensation Law. Subsequently, General Tire and Albany Truck initiated third-party actions against Sinnamon for indemnity or contribution, which were also dismissed by Special Term, citing Correction Law § 24. The Appellate Division affirmed these dismissals, ruling that Correction Law § 24 clearly bars such third-party actions against employees of the Department of Correctional Services acting within the scope of their employment. The court also rejected the appellants' equal protection challenge to the statute.

Workers' Compensation LawCorrection Law Section 24IndemnificationContributionThird-Party LiabilityGovernment ImmunityEmployee ProtectionStatutory InterpretationEqual Protection ChallengeMotor Vehicle Accident
References
3
Showing 1-10 of 908 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational