CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

What Happened in Felix vs. Weber Metals Reconsideration?

Claimant Maxine E. Allen, a telecommuter residing in Florida but working for a New York employer via electronic linkup, sought unemployment insurance benefits from New York after her telecommuting arrangement ended. The New York Commissioner of Labor determined her ineligible, asserting her employment was localized in Florida and that she had made a false statement on her claim form. This decision was subsequently affirmed by the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board and the Appellate Division. The Court of Appeals further affirmed, holding that under Labor Law § 511, physical presence determines the localization of employment for unemployment insurance purposes, thereby rendering Allen ineligible for New York benefits. The court also upheld the recoverable overpayment for the false statement.

unemployment insurancetelecommutinginterstate employmentlocalization of employmentLabor Lawphysical presenceNew YorkFloridaremote workeligibility
References
6
Showing 1-1 of 1 results

How Did the WCAB Rule in Hardgrove vs. Intercon Security?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational