Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. 2022-06-0698

Regular Panel Decision

Mar 13, 2024

Harris, Shunekari v. American International Group, Inc., d/b/a American Home Assurance

Shunekari Harris sought medical and temporary disability benefits, and reimbursement for medical costs, for alleged work-related bilateral tenosynovitis from American Home Assurance. The Court denied her requests, finding she failed to prove a causal connection between her employment and injury, primarily due to the rejection of Dr. Steven Koester's inconsistent medical opinions. Although Ms. Harris's notice defense was upheld, the Court concluded she did not meet the burden of proof for benefits. The decision highlighted Ms. Harris's choice not to use a panel physician offered by AIG, impacting her claim's viability.

Bilateral TenosynovitisMedical CausationExpert Witness TestimonyTimely Notice DefenseExpedited HearingTemporary Disability BenefitsMedical ReimbursementPanel of PhysiciansEmployee Burden of ProofConflicting Medical Opinions

References

Case No. MISSING

Regular Panel Decision

Simpson v. State Office of Risk Management

Carol G. Simpson, an employee of the Texas Workforce Commission, appealed a judgment in favor of the State Office of Risk Management (SORM) concerning her workers' compensation claim. Simpson developed tenosynovitis and carpal tunnel syndrome due to repetitive typing. After initial approvals by a hearing officer and the Appeals Panel, the district court reversed the decision, leading to Simpson's appeal. The appellate court found the evidence legally insufficient to support the jury's finding that Simpson did not sustain a repetitive trauma injury, reversing the trial court's judgment and affirming the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Panel's decision.

Workers' CompensationRepetitive Trauma InjuryTenosynovitisCarpal Tunnel SyndromeSufficiency of EvidenceAppellate ReviewOccupational DiseaseErgonomic IssuesOrthopedic SurgeryNeurology Testimony

References

Case No. 531927

Regular Panel Decision

Dec 15, 2022

In the Matter of the Claim of Donnay Kingston

Claimant Donnay Kingston appeals two decisions by the Workers' Compensation Board concerning her claim for bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome, later amended to include DeQuervain's tenosynovitis. In 2014, a WCLJ awarded her a schedule loss of use (SLU) of both wrists, which the Board affirmed in 2016. In 2019, claimant's treating physician requested to reopen the claim due to an alleged material change in her medical condition. Both the WCLJ and the Board denied the reopening, concluding that while symptoms had worsened, this was anticipated and did not constitute a *material* change warranting reopening. The Appellate Division affirmed the Board's decisions, finding no abuse of discretion in denying the reopening or the application for reconsideration.

Workers' CompensationSchedule Loss of Use (SLU)Carpal Tunnel SyndromeDeQuervain's TenosynovitisMedical Condition ChangeClaim ReopeningAbuse of DiscretionAppellate ReviewTreating PhysicianMedical Evidence

References

Case No. 08-06-00124-CV

Regular Panel Decision

May 22, 2008

Carol G. Simpson v. State Office of Risk Management

Carol G. Simpson, an adjudicator for the Texas Workforce Commission, developed pain in her upper extremities from repetitive typing, leading to diagnoses of tenosynovitis and carpal tunnel syndrome by Dr. Robert Bell. Her worker's compensation claim was initially approved by a hearing officer and the TWCC Appeals Panel, but the State Office of Risk Management (SORM) successfully appealed to a district court, where a jury found against Simpson. On appeal, the Court of Appeals found the evidence legally insufficient to support the jury's finding that Simpson did not sustain a repetitive trauma injury in the course and scope of her employment. The court therefore reversed the trial court's judgment and rendered judgment affirming the TWCC Appeals Panel's decision in favor of Simpson.

Workers' CompensationRepetitive Trauma InjuryOccupational DiseaseTenosynovitisCarpal Tunnel SyndromeSufficiency of EvidenceMedical Expert TestimonyErgonomicsTexas Labor CodeAppeal

References

Case No. MISSING

Regular Panel Decision

Claim of Torres v. Kaufman's Bakery

A claimant, a machine operator and supervisor, developed bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome and flexor tenosynovitis, and separately, a back injury. His claim for workers’ compensation benefits for the carpal tunnel syndrome was established, and he was classified with a permanent partial disability. The employer and its workers’ compensation carrier sought reimbursement from the Special Disability Fund, arguing the 2004 back injury constituted a preexisting permanent impairment hindering job potential. The Workers’ Compensation Board granted the application for reimbursement, leading the Fund to appeal this decision. The appellate court found substantial evidence to support the Board's determination that the claimant's back injury was indeed a preexisting permanent physical impairment which was likely to hinder employment, thus upholding the Board's decision.

Workers' CompensationSpecial Disability FundReimbursement ClaimPermanent Partial DisabilityPreexisting Permanent ImpairmentCarpal Tunnel SyndromeBack InjuryHindrance to EmploymentMaterially and Substantially Greater DisabilityAppellate Review

References

Case No. MISSING

Regular Panel Decision

Walker v. Saturn Corp.

Sharon Walker, an employee of Saturn Corporation, sought a full court review after a Special Workers’ Compensation Appeals Panel’s decision reduced her disability award. Walker suffered from tenosynovitis in both wrists and ulnar nerve entrapment in her left elbow due to repetitive work, requiring surgeries and leading to permanent restrictions. While medical experts provided anatomical impairment ratings, a vocational specialist assessed a 97% occupational disability given Walker’s limited skills and local job market opportunities. The court reversed the Panel's decision, affirming the trial court's original finding of an eighty-five percent permanent partial disability to both arms, emphasizing that vocational impairment is not solely dependent on anatomical impairment.

Workers' CompensationPermanent Partial DisabilityTenosynovitisDe Quervain's SyndromeUlnar Nerve EntrapmentVocational DisabilityAnatomical ImpairmentOccupational DisabilityRepetitive Strain InjurySurgery

References

Case No. 2022 NY Slip Op 07102

Regular Panel Decision

Dec 15, 2022

Matter of Kingston v. New York City Fire Dept.

In this workers' compensation case, claimant Donnay Kingston appealed two decisions of the Workers' Compensation Board. Kingston had established a claim in 2008 for bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome, later amended for DeQuervain's tenosynovitis, and received a schedule loss of use (SLU) award in 2014, affirmed in 2016. In 2019, her treating physician sought to reopen the claim, alleging a material change in her medical condition. Both a Workers' Compensation Law Judge and the Board denied the request, finding no sufficient change to warrant reopening or rescinding the SLU award, despite the physician noting a worsening of symptoms that was deemed anticipated. The Appellate Division, Third Department, affirmed both decisions, concluding that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the reopening and found claimant's remaining contentions without merit.

Workers' Compensation ClaimBilateral Carpal Tunnel SyndromeDeQuervain's TenosynovitisSchedule Loss of UseClaim Reopening DenialMedical Condition ChangeAppellate Division Third DepartmentBoard DiscretionTreating Physician TestimonyWrist Pain

References

Case No. MISSING

Regular Panel Decision

Aug 15, 1991

Claim of Jett v. Lew Mark Baking Co.

The claimant, a cookie packer for Lew Mark Baking Company, developed tenosynovitis in her right wrist in January 1989 due to repetitive motions. Initially, the case was closed in December 1989 with a 5% schedule award for loss of use of her right hand. After symptoms recurred, the case was reopened in June 1990, and a subsequent examination found an additional 2.5% increase in disability. Despite a Workers’ Compensation Law Judge's ruling, the Board unanimously decided that the claimant was permanently partially disabled and entitled to a continuing reduced earnings award of $84.95, based on the testimony of her treating physician, Paul Sternberg. The employer appealed, arguing lack of notice and insufficient evidence, but the Board’s decision was affirmed, citing substantial medical evidence of the claimant’s persistent pain, ongoing treatment needs, and inability to work full-time.

TenosynovitisRepetitive Hand MotionsPermanent Partial DisabilityReduced Earnings AwardSchedule AwardMedical EvaluationTreating Physician TestimonySubstantial EvidenceAppellate ReviewBoard Decision Affirmation

References

Case No. MISSING

Regular Panel Decision

Claim of Belfiore v. University of Rochester

This case involves an appeal from a Workers' Compensation Board decision. The claimant initially suffered right wrist de Quervain's disease and left wrist tenosynovitis in 1982 while employed at the University of Rochester. A second claim in 1999, during employment at IMPCO, established bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome, apportioned between the two injuries. In September 2000, the claimant sustained a right trigger thumb injury and sought to include it in her existing workers' compensation cases. A Workers' Compensation Law Judge found no causal relationship between the trigger thumb and prior occupational injuries, a decision affirmed by the Workers’ Compensation Board in March 2002 and amended in April 2002. The claimant's subsequent request for reconsideration was denied in December 2002, leading to an appeal that was ultimately dismissed as untimely, having been filed more than a year after the Board’s original decision and outside the 30-day window for appealing the denial of reconsideration.

Appeal DismissalUntimely AppealWorkers Compensation BoardOccupational InjuryDe Quervain’s DiseaseTenosynovitisCarpal Tunnel SyndromeTrigger ThumbCausal RelationshipSchedule Loss of Use

References

Showing 1-9 of 9 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. 2022-06-0698

Regular Panel Decision

Mar 13, 2024

Harris, Shunekari v. American International Group, Inc., d/b/a American Home Assurance

References

Case No. MISSING

Regular Panel Decision

Simpson v. State Office of Risk Management

Workers' CompensationRepetitive Trauma InjuryTenosynovitisCarpal Tunnel SyndromeSufficiency of EvidenceAppellate ReviewOccupational DiseaseErgonomic IssuesOrthopedic SurgeryNeurology Testimony

References

Case No. 531927

Regular Panel Decision

Dec 15, 2022

In the Matter of the Claim of Donnay Kingston

References

Case No. 08-06-00124-CV

Regular Panel Decision

May 22, 2008

Carol G. Simpson v. State Office of Risk Management

Workers' CompensationRepetitive Trauma InjuryOccupational DiseaseTenosynovitisCarpal Tunnel SyndromeSufficiency of EvidenceMedical Expert TestimonyErgonomicsTexas Labor CodeAppeal

References

Case No. MISSING

Regular Panel Decision

Claim of Torres v. Kaufman's Bakery

References

Case No. MISSING

Regular Panel Decision

Walker v. Saturn Corp.

References

Case No. 2022 NY Slip Op 07102

Regular Panel Decision

Dec 15, 2022

Matter of Kingston v. New York City Fire Dept.

References

Case No. MISSING

Regular Panel Decision

Aug 15, 1991

Claim of Jett v. Lew Mark Baking Co.

References

Case No. MISSING

Regular Panel Decision

Claim of Belfiore v. University of Rochester

Appeal DismissalUntimely AppealWorkers Compensation BoardOccupational InjuryDe Quervain’s DiseaseTenosynovitisCarpal Tunnel SyndromeTrigger ThumbCausal RelationshipSchedule Loss of Use

References

Showing 1-9 of 9 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.