CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Mair-Headley v. County of Westchester

The petitioner, a correction officer, was terminated from her employment by the Westchester County Department of Corrections after being absent for over one year due to a nonoccupational injury, pursuant to Civil Service Law § 73. She challenged this determination through a CPLR article 78 proceeding, alleging denial of due process and violation of the Human Rights Law. The Supreme Court initially dismissed the due process claim and transferred the remaining issues to this Court. This Court confirmed the determination, finding that the petitioner received adequate pre-termination notice and a post-termination hearing, satisfying due process. Additionally, the Court concluded that the termination did not violate the Human Rights Law, as employers are not obligated to create new light-duty or permanent light-duty positions for accommodation.

Civil Service LawCPLR Article 78Due ProcessHuman Rights LawEmployment TerminationCorrection OfficerDisability AccommodationWestchester CountyAppellate ReviewPublic Employment
References
21
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Billings v. County of St. Lawrence

The petitioner, an unnamed Deputy Sheriff and correction officer for the St. Lawrence County Sheriff’s Department, was terminated after a disciplinary hearing. He was found guilty of unprofessional conduct for inappropriately delivering tobacco to an inmate and for lying during the subsequent investigation, though not for causing an inmate disturbance. Despite a Hearing Officer's recommendation for a two-month suspension, the Undersheriff of St. Lawrence County opted for termination, effective April 22, 1987. The court, in this CPLR article 78 proceeding, confirmed the determination, finding the evidence sufficient and the termination penalty not excessive given the serious nature of the misconduct in a prison setting and the petitioner's relatively short, unblemished service record.

MisconductTerminationDeputy SheriffCorrection OfficerInmate ConductDisciplinary ActionSubstantial EvidencePenalty ReviewUnprofessional ConductLack of Candor
References
2
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

In re Weir v. State of New York Thruway Authority

Petitioner, a probationary laborer for the New York State Thruway Authority and New York State Canal Corporation, was terminated from his position after co-workers reported him for marihuana use during working hours. Despite a negative urine test and prior satisfactory performance reviews, the Albany Division Director recommended termination based on the credibility of the co-workers' statements and deteriorating relations. Petitioner challenged his termination through a CPLR article 78 proceeding, which was dismissed by the Supreme Court. The appellate court affirmed this dismissal, ruling that as a probationary employee, petitioner could be dismissed without a hearing or stated reasons, and he failed to demonstrate bad faith, arbitrary, capricious, or otherwise illegal reasons for his termination.

Probationary EmploymentTerminationDrug UseMarihuanaCPLR Article 78Judicial ReviewPublic EmploymentWorkplace ConductBad FaithArbitrary and Capricious
References
4
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Jacobsen v. New York State Department of Labor

Petitioner, a senior stenographer for the Department of Labor, was terminated after cumulative absences due to a work-related injury exceeded one year, pursuant to Civil Service Law § 71. The Department calculated absences including non-workdays. Petitioner challenged the calculation and argued improper termination due to lack of notice regarding the concurrent running of Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) leave. The court found respondent's method of calculating Civil Service Law § 71 leave rational. However, it determined that the Department of Labor failed to provide proper notice that petitioner's FMLA leave would run concurrently with her workers' compensation leave. Consequently, the court annulled the termination, granted the petition for reinstatement with back pay and benefits, and remitted the matter for further proceedings.

Workers' Compensation LeaveCivil Service LawFamily and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)Cumulative AbsencesTermination of EmploymentMedical DisabilityNotice RequirementsReinstatementBack Pay and BenefitsAdministrative Review
References
2
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Capone v. Patchogue-Medford Union Free School District

The petitioner, an employee of Patchogue-Medford Union Free School District (UFSD), was terminated after two adult students reported sexually explicit conversations and offers of sexual acts from him. The UFSD charged the petitioner with 18 specifications of misconduct under Civil Service Law §75. Following a hearing where 17 charges were sustained, the hearing officer recommended termination, which the UFSD adopted. The petitioner initiated an article 78 proceeding, arguing insufficient notice, lack of substantial evidence, and an excessively severe penalty. The court confirmed the determination, finding the charges adequate, supported by substantial evidence from student testimonies, and that termination was not disproportionate given precedent, despite the petitioner's previously unblemished 19-year record.

Employment terminationSexual misconductAdministrative reviewCivil Service LawSufficiency of evidencePenalty proportionalityArticle 78Due processHearing officer findingsPublic education employee
References
6
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Pollman v. Fahey

The petitioner, a clerk typist, was terminated from her employment with the Albany County Social Services Department following an incident on June 16, 1983. After a reprimand, she became distressed and engaged in a physical altercation with Security Officer Diane Cioffi, resulting in Cioffi's injury. Petitioner was subsequently convicted of disorderly conduct. A Civil Service Law § 75 hearing found her guilty of disruption and assault, leading to dismissal. In a CPLR article 78 proceeding, the petitioner challenged the termination, citing inadequate findings, a biased hearing officer, lack of substantial evidence, and excessive punishment. The court confirmed the determination, affirming that the findings were adequate, no bias was shown, the decision was supported by substantial evidence, and dismissal was not unduly severe given the gravity of the misconduct.

Employment TerminationMisconductAssaultCPLR Article 78Civil Service LawAdministrative HearingJudicial ReviewSubstantial EvidenceDue ProcessPanel Decision
References
5
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

In re Evelyn B.

The petitioner initiated proceedings to terminate the parental rights of the respondent, mother of Evelyn B., alleging mental illness or retardation after Evelyn B. was adjudicated neglected. The Family Court, Clinton County, terminated parental rights, relying on testimony from a court-appointed clinical psychologist who diagnosed the respondent with an untreatable learning disorder and mixed personality disorder, rendering her unable to provide proper care. The respondent appealed, presenting testimony from her treating therapist suggesting potential improvement. The appellate court affirmed the Family Court's decision, finding clear and convincing evidence supporting the termination due to the respondent's mental illness and upholding the Family Court's discretion in crediting the court-appointed psychologist over the respondent's therapist, whose expert qualification was also appropriately denied.

Parental Rights TerminationMental IllnessChild NeglectFamily LawAppellate ReviewClinical PsychologyForensic EvaluationPersonality DisorderLearning DisorderExpert Witness Credibility
References
6
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

In re Timonthy B.

The case concerns a proceeding for the termination of parental rights based on permanent neglect. The Family Court's decision to dismiss the petition was reversed. The appellate court found that the petitioner had established a prima facie case of diligent efforts to encourage the parental relationship and that the parent failed to maintain contact or plan for the children's future, contrary to Social Services Law § 384-b. Additionally, the Family Court erred in applying social worker-client privilege under CPLR 4508 to limit witness testimony. The matter was remitted to Monroe County Family Court for further proceedings.

Termination of Parental RightsPermanent NeglectParental RightsSocial Services LawCPLRFamily Court ActPrima FacieDiligent EffortsParental RelationshipWitness Testimony
References
6
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Tottey v. Varvayanis

The petitioner, an employee of the Town of Dryden Highway Department, injured his hip in 1999 and had surgery in April 2000, collecting workers' compensation benefits for temporary total disability until October 2000. During this period, he operated a driveway sealing business and performed work for the Varna Community Center, which included tasks beyond what he reported to the Workers' Compensation Board. Disciplinary charges were brought against him for filing false statements, perjury, theft/larceny, and improper conduct. The Hearing Officer recommended a 30-day suspension for unauthorized use of town equipment, but the Town Board and Superintendent Jack A. Bush ultimately terminated his employment for misrepresenting his work activities to fraudulently receive benefits. Petitioner initiated CPLR article 78 proceedings, arguing improper delegation and lack of substantial evidence. The court confirmed the termination, finding Bush's determination supported by substantial evidence, and dismissed the petitions.

Employment terminationWorkers' compensation fraudCPLR Article 78Substantial evidence reviewDisciplinary proceedingJudicial reviewAdministrative decisionMisrepresentation of work activitiesPenalty of dismissalMootness
References
15
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Apr 17, 2012

Montes v. Harrison Central School District

Angel Montes, a former senior custodian for the Harrison Central School District, was terminated during his probationary period. He initiated a hybrid action and Article 78 proceeding challenging his termination and seeking reinstatement to his prior custodial worker position with back pay, citing Civil Service Law § 63 (1). The Supreme Court of Westchester County granted his petition. The Harrison Central School District appealed this decision. The appellate court affirmed the Supreme Court's judgment, ruling that Montes's appointment as senior custodian constituted a "promotion" under the relevant Civil Service Law and Westchester County Civil Service Rules, thereby entitling him to return to his former position.

Employment TerminationProbationary PeriodPromotionCivil Service LawArticle 78Collective Bargaining AgreementReinstatementBack PayPublic EmployeeJudicial Review
References
1
Showing 1-10 of 8,880 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational