Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING

Regular Panel Decision

Apr 28, 2006

Woodward v. Woodward

In this divorce case, Michael V. Woodward (Husband) appealed the trial court's classification, valuation, and division of marital property, specifically challenging an award of $1,000 to Brenda J. Woodward (Wife) for equalization. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's judgment in most respects, finding that the evidence did not preponderate against the trial court's decision regarding asset classification and division, including the transmutation of Husband's separate property into marital property. However, the Court vacated the $1,000 award to Wife, deeming the evidence insufficient to support it. A dissenting opinion argued that given the short duration of the marriage, the parties should have been restored to their pre-marriage financial conditions, a principle the majority allegedly overlooked.

DivorceMarital PropertyProperty DivisionAsset ValuationEquitable DistributionShort-Term MarriageTransmutationSeparate PropertyAppellate ReviewAffirmation

References

Case No. MISSING

Regular Panel Decision

McGarrity v. McGarrity

The defendant wife appealed a judgment in a divorce case concerning equitable distribution, maintenance, and attorney's fees. The appellate court modified the judgment, increasing the wife's share of the husband's profit-sharing plan to $323,450 and her attorney's fees to $11,000. The court affirmed the maintenance award of $30,000 per year, finding it adequate given both parties' financial circumstances and future income, including substantial profit-sharing distributions. The court also found merit in the wife's claim regarding the husband's dissipation of $88,900 from a Country Bank account. However, the husband's inheritances, though deposited into joint accounts, were not deemed transmuted into marital property due to his lack of donative intent after the parties' separation.

DivorceEquitable DistributionMarital AssetsMaintenanceAttorney's FeesProfit-Sharing PlanDissipation of AssetsInherited PropertySpousal SupportAppellate Decision

References

Case No. MISSING

Regular Panel Decision

Snodgrass v. Snodgrass

This document is a concurring and dissenting opinion by Judge GARY R. WADE regarding the interpretation of Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-4-121(b)(1)(B) concerning marital and separate property in divorce cases. Judge Wade concurs with the majority that Mr. Snodgrass's 401(k) was not transmuted and that premarital contributions are separate property. However, he dissents from the majority's conclusion that the increase in value of these premarital contributions should be classified as marital property. He argues that the statutory phrase 'accrued during the period of the marriage' refers to the time the retirement benefit right is earned or acquired, not its subsequent appreciation. Citing prior precedents like Cohen v. Cohen and Langschmidt v. Langschmidt, Judge Wade asserts that premarital contributions and their appreciation should remain separate property unless clear evidence of commingling or substantial spousal contribution to their preservation and appreciation is presented, thus advocating for a remand to address these factors.

Marital PropertySeparate PropertyRetirement Benefits401(k) AccountsStatutory InterpretationTennessee LawDivorceEquitable DivisionComminglingSubstantial Contribution

References

Showing 1-3 of 3 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

Woodward v. Woodward

DivorceMarital PropertyProperty DivisionAsset ValuationEquitable DistributionShort-Term MarriageTransmutationSeparate PropertyAppellate ReviewAffirmation

McGarrity v. McGarrity

DivorceEquitable DistributionMarital AssetsMaintenanceAttorney's FeesProfit-Sharing PlanDissipation of AssetsInherited PropertySpousal SupportAppellate Decision

Snodgrass v. Snodgrass

Marital PropertySeparate PropertyRetirement Benefits401(k) AccountsStatutory InterpretationTennessee LawDivorceEquitable DivisionComminglingSubstantial Contribution