CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ3778927 (SFO 0460851) ADJ334222 (OAK0285716) ADJ2101319 (SFO0437718) ADJ4065670 (OAK0285715)
Regular
Dec 21, 2010

Kimberly Roberts vs. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed Kimberly Roberts' petition for reconsideration because the order she appealed was a pre-trial order continuing a status conference, not a final decision. The Board also denied her petition for removal, adopting the administrative law judge's reasoning. Roberts' claims of manipulation, defamation, and misconduct were not addressed due to the procedural defect of appealing a non-final order. The appeals board upheld the judge's decision to continue the status conference.

WCABPetition for ReconsiderationPetition for RemovalAdministrative Law Judge Pro TemContinuanceStatus ConferenceTrial SettingLabor Code Section 132(a)Permanent Disability AdvancesMileage Reimbursement
References
Case No. ADJ80340084
Regular
Apr 23, 2013

KEITH CRABTREE vs. CITY OF TURLOCK, YORK RISK SERVICES GROUP, INC.

This Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decision addresses a defendant's petition for removal. The Board denied removal regarding the WCJ's continuance of trial to April 29, 2013. However, the Board granted removal and rescinded the WCJ's order compelling the defendant to produce claims adjustor Rebecca Huiras and the claims file without a subpoena. The matter is returned to the trial level for further proceedings.

RemovalWCJContinuance of trialClaims adjustorWitness productionClaims fileSubpoenaRescindedReturned to trial levelDecision after removal
References
Case No. ADJ2041648 (SDO 0319858) ADJ2762432 (SDO 0319859) ADJ772603 (SDO 0319860)
Regular

STACIE L. NELDAUGHTER vs. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the County of San Diego's petition for removal. The County sought to rescind a six-month continuance granted for the applicant, alleging prejudice and discovery abuses, but failed to demonstrate significant harm. The Board found the County's arguments insufficient to justify removal and returned the cases to the trial level. The PWCJ is to schedule a status conference after January 26, 2010, to determine if further continuance is warranted based on a "clear showing of good cause."

Petition for RemovalOrder Granting ContinuancePrejudiceIrreparable HarmADA AccommodationDisability CoordinatorContinued HearingStatus ConferenceMandatory Settlement ConferenceDiscovery Abuses
References
Case No. ADJ7039474
Regular
Feb 27, 2012

BRIAN MURRAY vs. PK MANAGEMENT, LLC dba BORREGO RANCH RESORT AND SPA, INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA c/o CHARTIS CLAIMS INC.

This case involves applicant Brian Murray and defendants PK Management, LLC, and its insurer. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendants' Petition for Removal. The Board adopted the Workers' Compensation Judge's report, finding no objection to the applicant's Declaration of Readiness and that a trial date was secured. Any perceived request for continuance was deemed inadvertent and unsupported by substantial prejudice or irreparable harm.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for RemovalDeclaration of Readinesspre-trial conference statementtrial datecontinuanceMinutes of Hearingverified oppositionWCJAME's deposition
References
Case No. ADJ7191038
Regular
Oct 06, 2015

ROBERTO CUEVAS vs. MODERN METHOD ROOFING, INC., MAJESTIC INSURANCE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed a lien claimant's Petition for Reconsideration and denied their Petition for Removal. The WCJ had continued a trial to allow the defendant, who repeatedly failed to appear, to submit an amended pre-trial conference statement. The Board found the WCJ's order to be an interlocutory procedural decision, not a final order, thus making reconsideration improper. Removal was denied as the lien claimant failed to demonstrate irreparable harm.

WCABPetition for ReconsiderationPetition for RemovalLien ClaimantMinute OrderContinue TrialAmended Pre-trial Conference StatementReopen DiscoveryFinal OrderInterlocutory Order
References
Case No. ADJ12391409
Regular
Feb 06, 2023

MARTIN CASILLAS vs. JOSE TALAVERA, EUSEBIO VALLES SANCHEZ JR., LAS LOMAS INVESTMENTS LLC, BABAK MOHAMMADI, FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed a Petition for Reconsideration filed by Las Lomas Investments, LLC, and Babak Mohammadi. The Board found the petition was not taken from a "final" order, as it contested a procedural order continuing the trial. Furthermore, the Board ruled that the issue of being prima facie illegally uninsured must first be addressed at the trial level with the admission of evidence. Therefore, the petition was dismissed because it sought reconsideration of an interlocutory order and the substantive issue was not ripe for appeal.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationPrima Facie Illegally UninsuredFinal OrderSubstantive RightThreshold IssueInterlocutory Procedural IssueLabor Code Section 3715(d)Appeals Board En BancSubstantial Evidence
References
Case No. SFO 0492030
Regular
Jul 05, 2007

PATRICIA MIRANDA vs. EQUITY OFFICE PROPERTIES TRUST, AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE CO., GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied a petition for removal filed by Equity Office Properties Trust. The defendant sought to rescind an order continuing the case and allowing applicant discovery, arguing irreparable harm from further costs and delays. The Board found no substantial prejudice or irreparable harm to the defendant, adopting the WCJ's reasoning for the continuance to obtain a qualified medical evaluator report.

Petition for RemovalWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardQualified Medical EvaluatorDeclaration of Readiness to ProceedMandatory Settlement ConferenceContinuanceDiscoveryIrreparable HarmWCAB Rule 10416WCJ Report and Recommendation
References
Case No. ADJ1273904 (MON 0236591) ADJ164684 (MON 0236590)
Regular
Feb 05, 2020

BETTY BAUER vs. RIP GRIFFIN, CIGA on behalf of HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, in liquidation

This Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) decision dismisses a lien claimant's Petition for Removal. The petition was filed after the administrative law judge (WCJ) scheduled trial and denied a continuance request. However, the WCJ subsequently issued an order continuing the matter, rendering the Petition for Removal automatically dismissed. Consequently, the WCAB will not consider the lien claimant's supplemental pleading request.

Petition for RemovalWCJlien claimantautomatically dismissedsupplemental pleadingWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardCIGAliquidationadministrative law judgetrial
References
Case No. ADJ823138 (OXN 0142604)
Regular
Oct 25, 2010

CHERYL PEET vs. COUNTY OF VENTURA, Permissibly SelfInsured, Administered By CORVEL CORPORATION

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board is reconsidering a prior decision that found a deputy probation officer sustained industrial injuries resulting in 78% permanent disability. The defendant sought reconsideration, arguing the Qualified Medical Examiner's (QME) opinion, which formed the basis of the award, was ambiguous and unsubstantiated. The Board agrees that the QME's assessment of 60% whole person impairment is not adequately supported by the record, particularly in light of the applicant's own testimony regarding her daily activities. Therefore, the case is returned to the trial level for further evidence development and a new decision, with consideration for cost of living adjustments if a life pension is awarded.

Workers Compensation Appeals BoardCheryl PeetCounty of VenturaCORVEL CORPORATIONADJ823138OXN 0142604Opinion and Decision After Reconsiderationdeputy probation officerindustrial injuryright upper extremity
References
Case No. ADJ3863284 (OXN 0147713)
Regular
May 13, 2013

ISAIAS ORTIZ vs. WATERWAY PLASTICS, SAFETY NATIONAL INSURANCE

This case involves two lien claimants whose liens were dismissed for failing to pay an activation fee prior to trial. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration, finding that Labor Code section 4903.06 only requires proof of payment of the fee at a "lien conference," not a subsequent trial. Because the lien conference occurred in 2012 and the trial in 2013, the lien claimants were not required to pay the fee prior to trial. The WCAB rescinded the dismissal orders and returned the matter for further proceedings.

Lien activation feeWCABPetition for ReconsiderationLien ConferenceLien TrialLabor Code section 4903.06Declaration of Readiness to ProceedDismissal with prejudiceRescind OrderReturn to trial level
References
Showing 1-10 of 5,237 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational