CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Rowe v. Board of Education

Plaintiff sued Chatham Central School District Middle School for negligence after sustaining injuries from a fall in the school cafeteria, allegedly due to accumulated mud, water, and a lack of rain mats. The defendant School District subsequently impleaded the Chatham Central Teachers’ Association, claiming the Association was in control of the cafeteria and responsible for the plaintiff's injuries. Following a trial, the jury rendered a verdict of no cause for action in favor of both the School District and the Association. However, Special Term set aside this verdict and granted a new trial, based on evidence suggesting an accumulation of mud and water and the defendant's failure to provide janitorial services. On appeal, the Appellate Division reversed Special Term's order, reinstating the original jury verdict, concluding that the jury's finding was not against the weight of the evidence given the conflicting testimony presented at trial.

NegligencePremises LiabilitySlip and FallJury VerdictWeight of EvidenceAppellate ReviewNew Trial Order ReversedSchool CafeteriaChatham Central School DistrictColumbia County
References
3
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Archie v. Todd Shipyards Corp.

This case involves an appeal concerning a wrongful death action. The administratrix of a decedent’s estate sued Todd Shipyards Corporation after the decedent, an employee of Metalock Repair Service, Inc., drowned in a drydock. The decedent was working on a scaffold without guard rails or toe boards, in violation of multiple codes including the New York City Building Code, State Industrial Code, and Labor Law § 240(2). The original complaint was dismissed at the close of the plaintiff’s case. The appellate court found sufficient evidence of the defendant’s negligence, including statutory violations, to warrant submission to a jury. Citing legal precedents, the court emphasized a less stringent burden of proof in death actions and that contributory negligence is a defense for the defendant to prove. The judgment dismissing the complaint was unanimously reversed, and the matter was remanded for a new trial.

Wrongful DeathNegligenceScaffold SafetyLabor Law ViolationsCircumstantial EvidencePrima Facie CaseDismissal ReversedRemanded for New TrialContributory NegligenceCustom and Usage
References
7
Case No. 2025 NY Slip Op 05688
Regular Panel Decision
Oct 15, 2025

Matter of Sahara Constr. Corp. v. New York City Off. of Admin. Trials & Hearings

Sahara Construction Corp. challenged a determination by the New York City Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings (OATH) that upheld civil penalties and a restitution order for violations related to a home improvement project. The Appellate Division, Second Department, reviewed the CPLR article 78 proceeding. The court confirmed OATH's determination, finding that the imposed civil penalties of $5,000 and restitution of $230,266.63 were not disproportionate and fell within statutory guidelines. The Court also affirmed the denial of the petitioner's motions to dismiss and compel discovery, concluding they were not arbitrary and capricious. Consequently, the petition was denied, and the proceeding dismissed on the merits.

Home Improvement ContractorsCivil PenaltiesRestitution AwardAdministrative Code ViolationsCPLR Article 78Judicial ReviewAppellate ReviewAbuse of DiscretionSense of FairnessAdministrative Summons
References
7
Case No. ADJ7719607
Regular
Jul 27, 2012

STEVE WEDDLE vs. CITY OF PASADENA

The Appeals Board granted the defendant's Petition for Removal, rescinding the judge's order to take the case off calendar. The applicant's attorney declared readiness for trial and completed discovery, then unsuccessfully sought to continue the trial to develop the record. The Board found the judge abused discretion by ordering further discovery without trial or evidence submission. The case is returned for trial, with the judge retaining discretion to order record development post-trial if necessary.

Petition for RemovalOff Calendar OrderMandatory Settlement ConferenceDeclaration of Readiness to ProceedDiscovery ClosureMedical Record DevelopmentAgreed Medical EvaluatorMcDuffie v. Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit AuthorityWCJ DiscretionTrial Readiness
References
1
Case No. ADJ2036926 (FRE 0233858) ADJ1097945 (FRE 0233859)
Regular
Sep 16, 2010

LINDLA PINI vs. COUNTY OF FRESNO, YORK INSURANCE SERVICES GROUP, INC.

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the defendant's petition for removal, rescinding the judge's order to take the cases off calendar. The judge had determined further medical evidence was needed before trial, but the Board found this premature, as no evidence had yet been admitted. The Board stated that the necessity of augmenting the medical record can only be established after trial or submission for decision, not beforehand. The cases were returned to the trial level to be set for trial, with the judge retaining the power to supplement the record if necessary post-trial.

removalrescinded orderoff calendarmedical record developmentAlmaraz/Guzmansubstantial medical evidencesupplemental reportAME depotrial exhibitsmandatory settlement conference
References
1
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Jo v. JPMC Specialty Mortg., LLC

Mee Jin-Jo (now deceased and represented by her daughter Billian Jo) filed a pro se lawsuit against JPMC Specialty Mortgage, LLC, alleging improper retention of property after her eviction. Following a jury verdict of "no cause of action," Plaintiff filed a motion for a new trial under Rule 59 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court addressed Plaintiff's grievances concerning evidentiary rulings, consistency between in limine rulings and trial decisions, the presence of a corporate representative, proper service of discovery documents, opportunity to review deposition transcripts, judicial conduct, and the admissibility of new evidence and lay opinion testimony. The Court denied the motion, concluding that Plaintiff failed to demonstrate that a new trial was warranted.

Motion for New TrialRule 59 FRCPEvidentiary RulingsJury VerdictHarmless ErrorCorporate RepresentativeDeposition TranscriptLay Opinion TestimonyFederal Rules of EvidenceJudicial Discretion
References
50
Case No. ADJ8075448
Regular
Oct 10, 2017

ALEX ROBLES vs. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY, UTILITY WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration of a trial judge's award in favor of applicant Alex Robles against Southern California Gas Company (SCGC). SCGC sought reconsideration, asserting that crucial testimony was omitted from the trial record. The WCAB ordered transcription of all trial testimony to ensure a full and fair adjudication of SCGC's petition. This action was necessary to allow the Board further study of the factual and legal issues involved.

Petition for ReconsiderationFindings and AwardAOE/COEGoing and Coming RuleMinutes of HearingSummary of EvidenceTrial TestimonyWCAB Rule 10740Transcript TranscriptionElectronic Adjudication Management System
References
2
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Sep 03, 1982

Cerrato v. Thurcon Construction Corp.

This case concerns a construction worker (plaintiff) who sustained serious injuries and sued 211 Thompson Corp. (owner) and Thurcon Construction Corp. (general contractor). Defendant 211 Thompson Corp. raised an affirmative defense of lack of personal jurisdiction due to improper service of process. After the Statute of Limitations had expired, plaintiff moved to strike this defense, while 211 cross-moved to dismiss the action as time-barred. Special Term referred the issue of service validity to a referee, but the plaintiff argued for a jury trial on this factual issue. The Appellate Division, Supreme Court, New York County, modified Special Term's order, directing a jury trial on the validity of the service, while otherwise affirming the original determination. The dissenting opinion argued that the right to a jury trial should not be conditioned on the stage of proceedings or the impact of dismissal on the Statute of Limitations, and furthermore, considered the question of authority to accept service as one of law, not fact.

Jury TrialService of ProcessPersonal JurisdictionStatute of LimitationsAffirmative DefenseAppellate ReviewCPLRProcedural LawConstruction AccidentsNew York Courts
References
3
Case No. ADJ8843441
Regular
Oct 16, 2013

AUSTIN KWOMO vs. LOS ANGELES METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY

The Appeals Board granted the defendant's Petition for Removal, rescinding the WCJ's order to take the case off calendar. The Board found the WCJ prematurely ordered further medical record development before trial or submission for decision. Therefore, the case is returned to the trial level for proceedings consistent with *McDuffie*, with the WCJ retaining discretion to supplement the record *after* trial if necessary. The petition for disqualification of the WCJ was denied.

Petition for RemovalOrder Off CalendarFurther Development of RecordMedical OpinionsThreshold MatterTrialSubmission for DecisionExhibitsWitnessesSupplementation of Medical Record
References
1
Case No. ADJ8223680
Regular
Nov 06, 2013

JEANINE RYAN vs. LOWE'S HIW, INC., SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.

The defendant, Lowe's HIW, Inc., petitioned for removal, arguing that the workers' compensation judge improperly continued the case to trial before discovery was complete. However, on October 15, 2013, the case proceeded to trial, evidence was admitted, and the applicant testified, leading to submission for decision. Because the trial occurred as scheduled, the defendant's petition for removal became moot. Consequently, the Appeals Board dismissed the petition.

Petition for RemovalMootDismissedRescind OrderContinue to TrialDiscoveryStatus ConferenceStipulationsIssues IdentifiedExhibits Admitted
References
0
Showing 1-10 of 5,535 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational