CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Hastings v. Trinity Broadcasting of New York, Inc.

Steven M. Hastings sustained serious electric shock injuries in 1998 while working, receiving workers' compensation from his employer, Trinity Broadcasting Network. He later sought additional recovery from Trinity Broadcasting New York and its employee Jeffrey Montanye, alleging the latter caused the accident. Defendants argued the claim was barred by workers' compensation exclusivity, citing an 'alter ego' relationship between Trinity and Network. However, the court found Trinity and Network to be legally separate entities under New York law, thus Trinity could not use Network's workers' compensation defense. Consequently, the defendants' motion for summary judgment was denied, and the plaintiff's cross-motion to dismiss the affirmative defense was granted.

Workers' Compensation ExclusivitySummary JudgmentCorporate SeparationParent-Subsidiary RelationshipThird-Party LiabilityNew York Workers' Compensation LawMotion to DismissAffirmative DefensePersonal InjuryCorporate Autonomy
References
11
Case No. ADJ1433114
Regular
Aug 25, 2011

ANTONIO RAMIREZ vs. TRINITY BROADCASTING NETWORK, TRINITY CHRISTIAN CENTER, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration of a prior decision in the case of Ramirez v. Trinity Broadcasting Network. The WCAB rescinded the Administrative Law Judge's (ALJ) decision and returned the matter to the trial level for further proceedings. This action means the prior ruling is vacated, and the case will be re-evaluated by the ALJ. The parties still retain the right to seek reconsideration of any subsequent decision.

Workers Compensation Appeals BoardTrinity Broadcasting NetworkTrinity Christian CenterState Compensation Insurance FundOpinion and Order Granting ReconsiderationDecision After ReconsiderationWorkers' Compensation Administrative Law JudgeWCJrescindreturned to trial level
References
0
Case No. 28132/20 Appeal No. 907 Case No. 2022-04652
Regular Panel Decision
Oct 26, 2023

Rodriguez v. Trinity Evangelical Lutheran Church

Plaintiff Alicia Rodriguez appealed the denial of summary judgment in her slip and fall case against Trinity Evangelical Lutheran Church. Rodriguez alleged she was injured due to an accumulation of wax on the tile floor in a hallway within the church premises. The defendant, an out-of-possession landlord, had leased a portion of the building to plaintiff's employer, Lutheran Social Services of New York (LSSNY), which was contractually responsible for maintaining and cleaning the premises. The Appellate Division found that Trinity established prima facie evidence of its landlord status and lack of responsibility for the condition, and that the accident was not caused by a structural defect. Ultimately, the court reversed the lower court's order, granted summary judgment to the defendant, and dismissed the complaint, concluding that the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact regarding the defendant's control over the accident site.

Slip and fallPremises liabilityOut-of-possession landlordSummary judgmentLease agreementMaintenance responsibilityStructural defectControl of premisesAppellate DivisionNew York law
References
4
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Tagare v. NYNEX Network Systems Co.

Plaintiff Neil Tagare filed an action against NYNEX entities and several individuals, alleging discrimination based on color and national origin, retaliation under Title VII and the New York Human Rights Law, and breach of contract. Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint on various grounds, including Rule 17(a) regarding real party in interest and ripeness for the contract claim, and the applicability of Title VII and HRL to individual defendants. The court denied dismissal for breach of contract against NYNEX Network Systems Company and upheld HRL claims against individual defendants based on aiding and abetting. The court granted dismissal of Title VII claims against individual defendants and partially granted dismissal of the breach of contract claim against other defendants, while denying the motion for a more definite statement.

Employment DiscriminationNational Origin DiscriminationColor DiscriminationRetaliationBreach of ContractMotion to DismissTitle VIINew York Human Rights LawFederal Rules of Civil ProcedureIndividual Liability
References
31
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. American Recording & Broadcasting Ass'n

Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. (CBS) initiated an action to compel joint arbitration in a work assignment dispute between two unions: American Recording And Broadcasting Association (Association) and Radio & Television Broadcast Engineers Union, Local 1212, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (Local 1212). The Association, representing recording engineers, claimed certain work under its contract with CBS. However, CBS had already assigned this work to Local 1212, representing broadcast technicians, under a separate collective bargaining agreement. CBS demanded arbitration with both unions and consolidation of the arbitrations, which the Association opposed. The court rejected the Association's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim and lack of jurisdiction, finding that federal courts have jurisdiction under the Labor-Management Relations Act of 1947 to enforce promises to arbitrate. The court emphasized that collective bargaining agreements should be viewed in the context of the employer's entire workforce relationships, making consolidation practicable, economical, and convenient, while avoiding conflicting awards. Consequently, the court granted CBS's motion to consolidate the arbitrations and denied the Association's motion to dismiss.

Labor LawArbitrationWork Assignment DisputeCollective Bargaining AgreementUnion DisputeJurisdictionLabor-Management Relations ActConsolidation of ArbitrationNational Labor Relations BoardFederal Court Jurisdiction
References
8
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

LIN Television Corp. v. National Ass'n of Broadcast Employees & Technicians—Communications Workers

Plaintiff LIN Television Corporation sought to vacate a labor arbitration award that reinstated employee Timothy Flynn after his termination for making threats. Defendants, National Association of Broadcast Employees and Technicians—Communications Workers of America, counter-claimed to enforce the award. The arbitration found no "just cause" for termination, converting it to a suspension and mandating a positive psychiatric evaluation for Flynn's return. The U.S. District Court, reviewing cross-motions for summary judgment, confirmed the arbitration award. The court ruled that the award drew its essence from the collective bargaining agreement and did not violate public policy regarding workplace safety, thereby denying the plaintiff's motion and granting the defendants' motion.

Labor DisputeArbitration AwardVacaturEnforcementWorkplace SafetyCollective Bargaining AgreementJust CauseEmployee TerminationMental Health EvaluationFederal Court Review
References
26
Case No. 2018 NY Slip Op 28102
Regular Panel Decision
Apr 02, 2018

Pozner v. Fox Broadcasting Co.

Cliff Pozner, a former executive at Fox Broadcasting Company, was terminated following sexual harassment complaints from employees. Pozner subsequently initiated a lawsuit against Fox for breach of his employment contract. In response, Fox filed counterclaims alleging breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty, referencing company handbooks and established policies. Pozner moved to dismiss these counterclaims, contending that the employee handbooks lacked contractual enforceability and that his actions did not constitute a breach of fiduciary duty under prevailing legal standards. The court upheld the breach of contract counterclaim, recognizing that the handbooks were explicitly integrated into Pozner's employment agreement, but dismissed the breach of fiduciary duty counterclaim, stating that sexual harassment alone, without direct actions against the employer's financial interests, does not typically establish a breach of loyalty claim in New York.

Employment contractBreach of contractBreach of fiduciary dutySexual harassmentCounterclaimsMotion to dismissDuty of loyaltyCorporate policiesEmployee handbooksExecutive termination
References
8
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Sep 26, 2006

Velasquez-Spillers v. Infinity Broadcasting Corp.

The Supreme Court, New York County, issued an order on September 26, 2006, presided over by Justice Leland DeGrasse. This order granted defendant Infinity Broadcasting Corporation’s motion to dismiss intentional tort claims and plaintiff Brian Spillers’ cause of action for loss of services. Upon appeal, the court modified the order to reclassify the dismissal of an employment discrimination claim as a dismissal of a negligent hiring claim, otherwise affirming the original decision. The court found that allegations of Infinity’s vicarious liability for its supervisor Macchiaroli’s intentional torts were conclusory and outside the scope of employment, thus subjecting the claims to Workers’ Compensation Law. Furthermore, the complaint lacked evidence of Infinity's knowledge or acquiescence in Macchiaroli’s conduct, leading to the proper dismissal of related claims.

Intentional TortVicarious LiabilityEmployment DiscriminationNegligent HiringLoss of ServicesWorkers' Compensation Law ExclusivityScope of EmploymentMotion to DismissAppellate ReviewOrder Modification
References
4
Case No. 533203
Regular Panel Decision
Oct 06, 2022

Matter of Cotterell v. Trinity Health Corp.

Claimant, Meggan Cotterell, sustained a lower back injury in 2015 while working for Trinity Health Corporation. Later, a right hip injury was found to be causally-related to the original work injury. The employer and carrier argued the hip injury claim was untimely under Workers' Compensation Law § 28, which mandates claims be filed within two years of the accident. The Workers' Compensation Board affirmed the claim amendment, crediting the treating orthopedist's testimony that initial hip pain was confused with low back symptoms and the hip labral tear was diagnosed later. The Appellate Division affirmed the Board's decision, finding that medical reports indicating hip pain filed within two years, coupled with the delayed diagnosis, provided substantial evidence to support the Board's determination that the amendment was not time-barred.

Workers' CompensationHip InjuryLabral TearTimelinessWorkers' Compensation Law § 28CausationMedical EvidenceOrthopedist TestimonyAppellate ReviewBoard Decision
References
7
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

WEOK Broadcasting Corp. v. Planning Board

The respondent Planning Board of the Town of Lloyd denied WEOK Broadcasting Corporation's application for site plan approval for a radio transmitter facility, citing aesthetic concerns despite a comprehensive Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and mitigation efforts. The Supreme Court and Appellate Division annulled the Board's decision. The Court of Appeals affirmed these rulings, concluding that the Board's determination lacked substantial evidence, as it relied on generalized community objections rather than factual data to refute WEOK's detailed visual impact analysis. The court emphasized that while aesthetic considerations are valid, decisions must be supported by reasoned elaboration and evidence.

Site Plan ApprovalEnvironmental Impact StatementSEQRA ReviewZoning OrdinanceVisual ImpactRadio TransmitterAesthetic ConsiderationsSubstantial EvidenceAdministrative ReviewArticle 78 Proceeding
References
16
Showing 1-10 of 441 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational