CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ7447846
Regular
May 08, 2013

YUL LONG vs. CITY OF LONG BEACH

This case involves a police officer who suffered a severe stroke and paralysis, resulting in $100\%$ permanent disability. The defendant employer argued for apportionment of the disability due to alleged non-industrial factors. However, the Appeals Board affirmed the original finding of $100\%$ unapportioned permanent disability, finding the defendant failed to meet its burden of proving apportionment due to speculative medical opinions. The Board also affirmed the attorney fee calculation, deeming the defendant's arguments on this issue waived and procedurally sound.

Labor Code section 4662apportionmenthypertensionhemorrhagic strokeparalysisincurable mental incapacitypermanent disabilityagreed medical examinerallostatic loadcongenital
References
8
Case No. ADJ9911872
Regular
Jul 20, 2018

CRAIG HANUS vs. URS/AECOM CORPORATION, NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH PA

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration, upholding a prior award of 100% permanent disability for the applicant. The defendant argued the applicant's permanent disability rating was improperly calculated and that vocational evidence was flawed. However, the Board found that medical reports sufficiently supported the applicant's total disability and that the defendant failed to meet its burden of proof for apportionment. Therefore, the Board affirmed the award of unapportioned permanent total disability.

Permanent disability ratingApportionmentVocational expertQualified Medical EvaluatorAMA GuidesWork restrictionsActivities of daily livingDegenerative disc diseaseSubstantial medical evidencePetition for Reconsideration
References
2
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Claim of Harrington v. L.C. Whitford Co.

The claimant, a construction worker, experienced a severe exacerbation of pre-existing asthma after exposure to burning lead paint fumes in June 1996. A certified pulmonologist, Richard Evans, determined the exposure caused a permanent and total disability. A Workers' Compensation Law Judge (WCLJ) found an accidental injury causing permanent and total disability, which the Workers' Compensation Board affirmed in August 2001. The employer and carrier appealed, arguing the condition was pre-existing and only temporarily aggravated. The appellate court affirmed the Board's decision, finding substantial evidence to support that the work-site exposure significantly exacerbated the claimant's stabilized asthma, leading to a permanent and total disability.

Workers' CompensationPermanent Total DisabilityAsthma ExacerbationOccupational ExposureLead Paint FumesPre-existing ConditionMedical Expert TestimonySubstantial EvidenceAppellate ReviewIndustrial Accident
References
14
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Claim of VanDermark v. Frontier Insurance

In this workers' compensation appeal, the employer and its carrier challenged two decisions by the Workers’ Compensation Board concerning a claimant's permanent total disability. The claimant sustained a back injury in 1998 and was initially found to have a permanent partial disability. However, the Board later modified the award, concluding the claimant had a permanent total disability after August 2004, a finding supported by the testimony of her treating orthopedic surgeon despite conflicting medical evidence. The employer also contested the denial of their applications for reconsideration and/or full Board review, arguing insufficient evidence and an abuse of discretion. The appellate court affirmed the Board's decisions, deferring to its resolution of conflicting medical evidence and finding no arbitrary or capricious action in denying reconsideration, as no new evidence was presented.

Workers' Compensation LawPermanent Total DisabilityPermanent Partial DisabilityMedical EvidenceConflicting Medical OpinionsBoard's DiscretionReconsideration ApplicationFull Board ReviewAppellate ReviewSufficiency of Evidence
References
6
Case No. ADJ3835415 (GOL 0098582)** **ADJ4033599 (GOL 0098581)** **ADJ6836655** **ADJ7026039
Regular
Mar 04, 2019

GARY MILLS vs. AMERICAN SEDGWICK SERVICES

This case involves applicant Gary Mills seeking reconsideration of a joint award for 100% permanent total disability resulting from multiple industrial injuries sustained as a paramedic. The defendant argues that the disability should be apportioned between the separate injury dates. However, medical experts, including the Agreed Medical Examiner in orthopedics, found it medically impossible to apportion the applicant's permanent total disability between the various injuries and subsequent complications. The Board affirmed the WCJ's decision, holding that an unapportioned award is justified when medical evidence prevents precise apportionment, particularly when complications from medical treatment directly cause the permanent total disability.

Permanent Total DisabilityApportionmentAgreed Medical ExaminerCumulative TraumaSpecific InjuryJoint Findings of Fact and AwardPetition for ReconsiderationWCJBenson ApportionmentKite case
References
9
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Sep 08, 1983

Claim of McNeil v. Geary

The claimant, a groom, injured her left knee in 1979 and was initially found temporarily totally disabled. The Workers' Compensation Board later reclassified her injury as a 15% permanent partial disability of the left leg, dating from the time of injury, and increased her benefits based on wage expectancy due to her being under 25. The employer appealed, arguing that wage expectancy benefits should not apply to the period of temporary total disability and that the record didn't substantiate a permanent partial disability ab initio. The court affirmed the Board's decision, stating that reclassification is a factual determination within the Board's sole province and was based on substantial evidence, and that the Board has continuing jurisdictional power to modify findings.

Permanent Partial DisabilityWage ExpectancyWorkers' Compensation LawInjury ReclassificationBoard JurisdictionSubstantial EvidenceLeft Knee InjuryGroomRiding AcademyTemporary Total Disability
References
4
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Matter of Williams v. Preferred Meal Systems

Claimant, a driver, suffered injuries to his right knee and back in 2009 while making a delivery, leading to an established workers' compensation claim. The claim was later amended to include consequential adjustment disorder, and the Workers' Compensation Board ultimately found that claimant had sustained a permanent total disability from May 2012 onward. The employer, workers’ compensation carrier, and policy administrator appealed this decision, arguing that further proof was needed regarding claimant's vocational and functional capacity. The court affirmed the Board's decision, holding that extensive evidence of vocational and functional capacity is not required when medical proof demonstrates a permanent total disability and inability to engage in any gainful employment, as benefits continue for life in such cases. The court found substantial evidence in the opinions of treating and independent medical examination orthopedists to support the finding of permanent total disability.

Workers' CompensationPermanent Total DisabilityWage-Earning CapacityMedical ProofVocational CapacityFunctional CapacityAppellate ReviewNew York LawDisability BenefitsClaimant Rights
References
4
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Claim of Baltsavias v. Caldor, Inc.

Claimant sustained work-related injuries in August 1975 and March 1977, leading to a permanent partial disability. The Workers’ Compensation Board apportioned the disability 25% to the 1975 case and 75% to the 1977 case, sustaining awards and an allowance for claimant’s former attorneys. The claimant appealed, arguing for permanent total disability and challenging legal fees. However, the court found these arguments outside the scope of the appeal, noting that prior decisions had established the nature and extent of disability and no timely appeal was taken. Reviewing the record, the court found substantial evidence to support the Board’s factual findings regarding carrier responsibility for medical bills and the average weekly wage. Consequently, the Board’s decision was affirmed.

Workers' CompensationPermanent Partial DisabilityAppealBoard DecisionMedical BillsAverage Weekly WageCausally Related DisabilityTimelinessLegal FeesReopened Cases
References
0
Case No. ADJ1584272
Regular
Dec 03, 2010

RICHARD SILVA vs. PAZIN & MYERS, INC., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration, upholding the finding of 100% permanent disability for the applicant's back and psyche injuries. The Board found that the workers' compensation judge properly applied the 1997 Schedule for Rating Permanent Disabilities due to pre-existing medical reports indicating permanent disability. Substantial evidence, including the Agreed Medical Examiner's opinion on permanent total disability and the applicant's treating psychologist's opinion, supported the 100% disability rating. The defendant failed to meet its burden to prove apportionment of the disability.

ADJ1584272FRE 0244029Pazin & MyersInc.State Compensation Insurance FundFindings and AwardSeptember 142010industrial injuryback
References
8
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Matter of Wohlfeil v. Sharel Ventures, LLC

The claimant, injured in October 2007, was initially found by a Workers’ Compensation Law Judge and affirmed by the Workers’ Compensation Board to have a permanent partial disability and a 75% loss of wage-earning capacity. The claimant subsequently appealed this decision. Medical experts, including the claimant's treating physician, Clifford Ameduri, and an independent medical examiner, Guy Corkhill, consistently testified that the claimant was totally disabled and incapable of any gainful employment. Despite this overwhelming medical evidence, the Board concluded that the claimant could perform sedentary work. The appellate court reversed the Board's findings, determining that they were not supported by substantial evidence in the record. The court concluded that the evidence actually warranted a finding of a permanent total disability for the claimant.

Permanent Partial DisabilityLoss of Wage-Earning CapacitySpinal FusionSpinal Cord StimulatorMedical TestimonyIndependent Medical ExaminationSedentary WorkTotal DisabilitySubstantial EvidenceAppellate Review
References
3
Showing 1-10 of 7,678 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational