CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ7673518, ADJ7647749
Regular
Jan 23, 2015

ANA DE AYALA vs. AO-THE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION / CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and reversed a prior ruling, finding the applicant sustained industrial injury to her neck. While the applicant testified to injuring her neck in a workplace incident and this was partially corroborated, the Board found insufficient evidence for other claimed injuries. The Board specifically disagreed with the administrative law judge's credibility assessment concerning the neck injury itself, relying on medical reports and testimony supporting the neck injury claim. The Board affirmed the denial of claims for all other alleged injuries, finding insufficient medical evidence to link them to the incident.

Petition for ReconsiderationFindings and OrderIndustrial InjuryNeck InjuryBack InjurySpine InjuryUpper ExtremitiesPsycheGastroesophageal SystemInternal System
References
Case No. ADJ383777
Regular
Apr 04, 2011

Roxanna Ortiz vs. ONE SOURCE, ESIS

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Roxanna Ortiz's petition for reconsideration of a prior findings and order. The initial ruling determined she sustained industrial injury only to her cervical spine as a janitor, not to other body parts or any resulting temporary/permanent disability or need for further medical treatment. Ortiz argued the judge erred by favoring defense medical reports and discrediting her testimony due to minor inconsistencies in her injury description. The Board adopted the WCJ's report, emphasizing deference to credibility determinations and that admissibility of medical reports should have been challenged at trial, not on reconsideration. A dissenting opinion argued the judge overemphasized minor variations in Ortiz's account and that medical evidence did not sufficiently support denial of other injuries or further treatment.

OrtizOne SourceESISWCABFindings and OrderPetition for ReconsiderationWorkers' Compensation Administrative Law Judgeindustrial injurycervical spineright arm
References
Case No. ADJ8501790
Regular
Jul 29, 2015

Kelly Chase vs. St. Louis Blues Hockey Club, Federal Insurance Company

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) reversed a prior finding of industrial injury for a professional hockey player against the St. Louis Blues. The WCAB found insufficient connection to California for jurisdiction, citing the player's limited games in the state compared to his overall career. This decision followed the precedent set in *Federal Insurance Co. v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. (Johnson)*, which requires a legitimate and substantial connection to the state for jurisdiction. The WCAB concluded that 21 games out of 485 did not meet this standard for a cumulative injury claim.

WCABSt. Louis Blues Hockey ClubFederal Insurance CompanyADJ8501790Opinion and Decision After Reconsiderationcumulative industrial injuryprofessional hockey playersubject matter jurisdictionstatute of limitationssubstantial medical evidence
References
Case No. ADJ602790 (STK 0179563)
Regular
Jul 17, 2012

TRACEE MAWYER vs. GALLO GLASS COMPANY

This case involves Tracee Mawyer's workers' compensation claim against Gallo Glass Company for cumulative trauma injuries. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, reversing the trial judge's denial of injury to applicant's bilateral upper extremities, specifically carpal tunnel syndrome. The Board found Dr. Clayman's reports sufficiently supported an industrial injury to the upper extremities and awarded additional temporary disability for the period following carpal tunnel surgery. The case was returned for a new permanent disability rating for the upper extremity injuries.

Cumulative traumabilateral upper extremitiescarpal tunnel release surgerytemporary disabilitypermanent disability ratingreconsiderationDr. Claymanneck injuryshoulder injuryspine injury
References
Case No. ADJ3904838 (LBO 0377238)
Regular
Jun 20, 2015

EDWARD MORSE vs. CONWAY WESTERN EXPRESS, INDEMNITY INSURANCE, CONSTITUTION STATE SERVICE COMPANY

This case involves cross-petitions for reconsideration of a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) decision regarding an injured truck driver. The WCAB granted the defendant's petition to correct a clerical error, increasing the third-party credit from $179,001.50 to $199,001.50. The Board denied the applicant's petition regarding penalties for failure to provide medical treatment, deferring the issue until the application of the credit is determined. The original decision found the applicant sustained industrial injuries to multiple body parts and systems and awarded penalties against the defendant were not warranted.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationFindings and AwardIndustrial InjuryTruck DriverNeck InjuryBack InjuryShoulder InjuryKnee InjuryUpper Extremity Injury
References
Case No. ADJ3179043
Regular
Nov 12, 2008

TINA PERRY vs. LYONS OF CALIFORNIA, FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Tina Perry's petition for reconsideration. The Board upheld the Administrative Law Judge's finding that Perry sustained an industrial injury only to her neck and upper extremities, not her lower body. This decision was based on the independent medical examiner's opinion, which the Board found to be substantial evidence despite applicant's contrary contentions.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationFindings and AwardIndustrial InjuryWaitressNeck InjuryUpper ExtremitiesLow Back InjuryHips InjuryKnees Injury
References
Case No. ADJ2552674 (STK 0182074), ADJ2434993 (LAO 0814353), ADJ815249 (STK 0199201)
Regular
Jan 24, 2012

CARLOS GASCA vs. HOWARD MARTIN FARMS, CIGA through its servicing facility INTERCARE INSURANCE for PAULA INSURANCE, in liquidation, CALIFORNIA INDEMNITY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board rescinded the prior award and remanded the case for further proceedings. The Board found that Dr. Abelow's medical opinion lacked substantial evidence due to factual inaccuracies and assumptions, particularly regarding the applicant's injury causation and apportionment. Additionally, Dr. Kimmel's psychiatric opinion failed to meet legal causation standards, deferring to orthopedic findings. The lien claimant's contentions will be reviewed anew by the WCJ upon remand.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCarlos GascaHoward Martin FarmsCIGAIntercare InsurancePaula InsuranceCalifornia IndemnityJoint Findings and AwardAdministrative Law JudgeReconsideration
References
Case No. ADJ6655702
Regular
Mar 18, 2010

GERICK CATUGDA vs. WINKLEBLACK CONSTRUCTION, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE COMPANY c/o APPLIED RISK SERVICES

This case concerns whether the "going and coming rule" bars applicant's workers' compensation claim for injuries sustained during his commute. The defendant argued the rule applied, but the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied their petition for reconsideration. The Board adopted the WCJ's finding that the applicant's employment required him to have transportation for multiple job sites, creating an exception to the rule. This decision aligns with established precedent, where transportation necessity for the employer's benefit removes the commute from the rule's exclusion.

Going and coming ruleindustrial injuryconstruction laborerhead injurybrain injurypsyche injuryspine injuryribs injurypelvis injuryarms injury
References
Case No. LAO 0866278 LAO 0866280
Regular
Feb 19, 2008

DORA BENAVIDES vs. MAINSTAY BUSINESS SOLUTIONS

The applicant sought reconsideration to set aside a Compromise and Release (C&R) agreement, claiming she changed her mind about waiving future medical treatment. The Appeals Board denied the petition, agreeing with the WCJ that the applicant provided no grounds like fraud or duress to void the settlement. Despite noting the WCJ's incorrect standard for setting aside a C&R on reconsideration, the Board found the $20,000 settlement adequate given the medical evidence supporting minimal permanent disability.

Compromise and ReleasePetition for ReconsiderationWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardIndustrial InjurySpine InjuryNeck InjuryUpper Extremities InjuryWrist InjuryHand InjuryShoulder Injury
References
Case No. LAO 823855, LAO 823856
Regular
Oct 03, 2007

PEDRO M. RODRIGUEZ vs. RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY

The applicant sought reconsideration of a denial of workers' compensation benefits, which was based on the finding that his claims were filed after notice of termination. The Board affirmed the denial, concluding that the applicant's job abandonment led to a termination prior to the filing of his claims. The Board also determined that the employer properly denied both the specific and cumulative trauma claims, thus negating a presumption of compensability.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationFindings and OrderFindings of FactAdministrative Law JudgeApplicantDefendantRalphs Grocery CompanySecurity GuardIndustrial Injury
References
Showing 1-10 of 8,524 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational