CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. VNO 447332, VNO 447334, VNO 467294
Regular
Dec 03, 2007

WILLIAM ROCCO vs. LANCASTER SCHOOL DISTRICT, AMERICAN CASUALTY INSURANCE CO., TIG INSURANCE COMPANY

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration and rescinded the prior decision, finding that the WCJ's handling of the Statute of Limitations defense in Case No. VNO 447334 requires further development of the record regarding potential tolling or estoppel. The Board returned Cases No. VNO 447332 and VNO 447334 to the trial level for further proceedings and a new decision, while affirming the WCJ's finding of no industrial injury in Case No. VNO 467294. The Board clarified that estoppel was timely raised in post-trial briefs and that the employer's knowledge of the applicant's compensation rights is crucial to the Statute of Limitations defense.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardIndustrial InjuryStatute of LimitationsEstoppelTollingQualified Medical EvaluatorCumulative TraumaSpecific InjuryAffirmative DefenseDWC-1 Claim Form
References
5
Case No. ADJ3283274 (VNO 0386537) ADJ4545965 (VNO 0386536) ADJ3421140 (VNO 0347301)
Regular
Jan 25, 2010

BARBARA STRAUSS vs. WEST MARINE, INC., CIGA for RELIANCE in liquidation, TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY, FIREMAN'S FUND

This case involves a clerical error in the caption of a prior Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) order denying reconsideration. The error involved the incorrect assignment of ADJ and VNO numbers to the relevant case numbers. The WCAB is correcting this error to accurately reflect the case numbers as ADJ3283274 and VNO 0386537. This correction ensures proper record-keeping for applicant Barbara Strauss and defendants West Marine, Inc., et al.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardOrder Denying ReconsiderationFindings and AwardAdministrative Law JudgeClerical ErrorCorrected Case NumberADJ NumberVNO NumberReversal of NumbersLiquidation
References
0
Case No. ADJ1028082; (VNO 418963) ADJ1374423; (VNO 340657)
Regular
Sep 26, 2008

MICHAEL PERRY vs. STUDENT WORKS PAINTING, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION, BROADSPIRE SERVICES, INC., PACIFIC THERMOGRAPHERS / TAYLOR CORPORATION, SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY

Reconsideration granted. Findings and Award in VNO 418963 amended to correct errors; VNO 340657 amended to reflect apportionment, award rescinded for further proceedings on future medical treatment liability.

CIGACalCompBroadspireSafecoApportionmentReconsiderationFindings and AwardAgreed Medical ExaminersCumulative TraumaSpecific Injury
References
14
Case No. VNO 0470470
Regular
May 12, 2008

GERARDO RAMIREZ vs. WILLIAM ALONSO, UNINSURED EMPLOYERS FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to further develop the record concerning applicant Gerardo Ramirez's employment status at the time of his injury. The Board rescinded the previous findings, finding the evidence insufficient to support dual employment and needing clarification on whether applicant was a casual employee, which might affect his eligibility for benefits. The case was returned to the trial level for additional evidence gathering, including a review of the defendant's insurance policy for the property where the injury occurred.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardUninsured Employers Fundindustrial injuryright major extremitydefendant's contentiondual employmentthreshold issueemployment relationshippresumption of employmentjoint venture
References
8
Case No. VNO 475856, VNO 447039, VNO 447045, VNO 447094, VNO 447095, VNO 448064, VNO 461057
Regular
Jan 17, 2008

ORALIA MONGE vs. LATIN AMERICAN CIVIC ASSOCIATION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration of a prior decision. After review, the WCAB affirmed the original findings and orders served on September 5, 2007, in multiple cases involving applicant Oralia Monge and defendants Latin American Civic Association and State Compensation Insurance Fund. The decision was finalized and served on January 17, 2008.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationOpinion and DecisionAffirmationCase NumbersApplicantDefendantsState Compensation Insurance FundBradford & Barthel LLPFloyd Skren & Kelly LLP
References
0
Case No. VNO 479308, VNO 469079, VNO 496106, VNO 395924, VNO 395925
Regular
Sep 20, 2007

TYRONE PLAYER vs. LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, SEDGWICK CMS

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Tyrone Player's petition for reconsideration, affirming the previous award. The Board found that the applicant failed to establish a causal link between his employment and claimed injuries of vision and headaches, as the medical evidence presented was not substantial. Furthermore, the Board concluded that reopening the medical record was unwarranted given the applicant's prior opportunities to obtain adequate evidence.

Petition for ReconsiderationJoint Findings and Awardspecific industrial injuriescumulative trauma injurymaintenance workerLos Angeles Unified School Districtvision injuryheadachespermanent disabilityLabor Code section 4664(b)
References
3
Case No. VNO 0441119; VNO 0367459 VNO 0463692; VNO 0534962 VNO 0534964
Regular
Apr 07, 2008

BRADLEY PONSFORD vs. HOUSING AUTHORITY, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RISK MANAGEMENT AGENCY

The defendant sought reconsideration of a workers' compensation award based on stipulated facts concerning the applicant's injury and indemnity payments. The defendant contended there was a mutual mistake of fact regarding credit for permanent disability advances. However, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the petition as untimely, as it was filed three days after the statutory deadline for reconsideration. The Board found the defendant failed to meet the jurisdictional time limit for filing the petition.

Industrial injuryBilateral kneesBilateral shouldersPolice officerTemporary disability indemnityPermanent disabilityStipulationsMutual mistake of factPermanent disability advancesPetition for reconsideration
References
2
Case No. VNO 0446654 VNO 0446655 VNO 0446656 VNO 0447607
Regular
Aug 18, 2008

CLARA LOSURDO vs. LAS VIRGENES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, KEENAN & ASSOCIATES

Defendant Las Virgenes Unified School District successfully petitioned for removal, vacating a trial date and rescinding an order to proceed on three family-filed home health care liens totaling $299,500. The Board found the applicant's case, including the liens, was not ready for trial due to a lack of evidence and disclosed witnesses, and that the defendant was denied essential discovery rights. The Board remanded the case to allow for discovery on the necessity, reasonableness, and actual performance of the claimed home health care services. Furthermore, the liens will not be tried until the disputed body parts injured are resolved.

RemovalHome Healthcare LiensApplicant's RelativesDiscovery RightsReasonableness and NecessityBurden of ProofPretrial Conference StatementDeclaration of Readiness to ProceedMandatory Settlement ConferenceParts of Body Injured
References
0
Case No. VNO 386794, VNO 290443, VNO 401331, VNO 332982
Regular
Aug 08, 2007

ANA PALENCIA vs. SAMCO SCIENTIFIC

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of an order dismissing Albers Medical Pharmacy's lien because there was no proof of service of the dismissal order. The lien claimant did not receive actual notice until much later, making their petition for reconsideration timely. The Board rescinded the dismissal and returned the matter for further proceedings, emphasizing that failure to properly serve a party is a substantive defect.

Albers Medical PharmacyPetition for ReconsiderationOrder Dismissing LienService of ProcessProof of ServiceActual NoticeNotice of Intention to DismissLien ClaimantRescind OrderReturn to Trial Level
References
3
Case No. VNO 514162, VNO 514164, VNO 514165, VNO 542022
Regular
Mar 17, 2008

MIA DOEVE vs. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

This case involves an applicant who sustained multiple admitted industrial injuries while employed as a deputy sheriff. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration because the WCJ's finding of 0% permanent disability was not adequately supported by the evidence, particularly the DEU rater's conclusions. The Board rescinded the prior award and returned the case for further proceedings, including cross-examination of the DEU rater and reconsideration of which permanent disability rating schedule applies.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardDeputy SheriffIndustrial InjuriesPermanent DisabilityAgreed Medical Evaluator1997 Schedule2005 ScheduleLabor Code Section 4061Wilkinson doctrineDisability Evaluation Unit
References
3
Showing 1-10 of 932 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational