CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

League of Voluntary Hospitals & Homes v. Local 1199, Drug, Hospital & Health Care Workers Union

The court addresses an application for a preliminary injunction against Local 1199, a union planning a three-day strike. The League of Voluntary Hospitals and Homes of N. Y. sought the injunction following a previous temporary restraining order concerning a one-day strike. The union argued that each planned strike required a new legal proceeding, but the court deemed the strikes "episodic and organically connected." Citing concerns about blocked ingress/egress to hospitals and the union president's threats to "shut down" facilities, the judge found a preliminary injunction necessary under Labor Law § 807 to protect public health and safety. The injunction restrains the union from unlawfully interfering with hospital operations, blocking access, and picketing within certain distances of hospital entrances and emergency rooms.

Labor DisputePreliminary InjunctionStrike ActionUnion ActivityHospital AccessPicketing RegulationsCollective BargainingCivil Disobedience ThreatPublic Health and SafetyIngress Egress Interference
References
1
Case No. ADJ8691809
Regular
Apr 14, 2017

NICOLE BORAGNO vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CDCR - CENTRAL CALIFORNIA WOMEN'S FACILITY CHOWCHILLA, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/STATE CONTRACT SERVICES

This case involves Nicole Boragno's workers' compensation claim against the State of California, CDCR. The applicant sought reconsideration of a decision denying the admission of a supplemental medical report. The WCAB denied reconsideration, adopting the WCJ's report which found the supplemental report inadmissible. This was because discovery had closed at the mandatory settlement conference, and the defendant failed to establish good cause for introducing evidence not previously disclosed. The WCJ noted there was no change in circumstances to warrant the late-filed report, distinguishing it from precedent that allows such reports.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDPetition for Reconsiderationmandatory settlement conferencediscovery closureLabor Code section 5502(d)(3)good causesupplemental reportPQMEapportionmenttimeliness
References
2
Case No. ADJ8616799
Regular
Aug 16, 2013

STEPHANIE LLAMAS vs. SAM'S CLUB, ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE, Administered By YORK INSURANCE SERVICES GROUP, INC.

This case involves a Petition for Reconsideration filed by a party in the matter of Stephanie Llamas vs. Sam's Club. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board has issued an order dismissing this petition. The dismissal is due to the petitioner's voluntary withdrawal of the petition. Therefore, the Board has formally closed the reconsideration process for the June 14, 2013 decision.

Petition for ReconsiderationDismissalWithdrawnStephanie LlamasSam's ClubAce American InsuranceYork Insurance Services GroupWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardADJ8616799Oxnard District Office
References
0
Case No. LAO 825981, LAO 825983
Regular
Sep 14, 2007

LUCRETIA SHERMAINE vs. LIFECARE ASSURANCE COMPANY, EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, ACCA, FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted Everest's petition for reconsideration, finding that Everest properly filed a timely petition for contribution on August 11, 2006. The Board rescinded the lower orders, determining that not all contribution issues were subject to mandatory arbitration, and returned the matter for further proceedings. The Board encouraged voluntary arbitration of all contribution issues to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ContributionLabor Code § 5500.5Labor Code § 5275Mandatory ArbitrationCumulative InjurySpecific InjuryCompromise and ReleaseApportionment of LiabilityDeclaration of Readiness to Proceed
References
6
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Claim of Ickes v. Sayville Animal Hospital

Claimant, a veterinary technician, suffered a work-related injury and received workers' compensation benefits. The carrier sought to suspend payments due to the claimant's failure to provide a work status affidavit. At a hearing, the carrier introduced the issue of voluntary withdrawal from the labor market without prior notice to the claimant, which the WCLJ promptly dismissed. Despite the WCLJ's ruling, the Workers' Compensation Board later modified the decision, finding voluntary withdrawal and rescinding benefits. On appeal, the court reversed the Board's rescission of benefits, ruling that the claimant was denied due process as she had no notice or opportunity to address the voluntary withdrawal issue. The case was remitted to the Board for further proceedings consistent with the court's decision.

Workers' CompensationLabor Market WithdrawalDue ProcessNotice of IssueAppellate ReviewRemandBenefit SuspensionAdministrative LawWorkers' Compensation BoardJudicial Modification
References
4
Case No. LAO 810766
Regular
Mar 07, 2008

ALISON FAIRCHILD vs. DENNY'S RESTAURANT

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the defendant's Petition for Removal because defense counsel claims they did not receive notice of the mandatory settlement conference and trial. The Board found that defense counsel likely did not receive proper service at their correct address and was thus deprived of notice and an opportunity to appear. Consequently, the scheduled March 13, 2008 trial has been redesignated as a mandatory settlement conference.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for RemovalMandatory Settlement ConferenceNotice of HearingService of ProcessDeclaration of Readiness to ProceedOfficial Address RecordIndustrial InjuryWaitressMultiple Sclerosis
References
0
Case No. ADJ7300791
Regular
Jun 06, 2011

James Larsh vs. CITY OF MONROVIA

The City of Monrovia petitioned for removal, arguing the Appeals Board lacked jurisdiction as it was never formally joined as a defendant. While the applicant alleged an injury against the County of Riverside, a claim form also indicated a cumulative trauma injury against Monrovia, which Monrovia had participated in proceedings for, including a Mandatory Settlement Conference. The Appeals Board granted the removal petition, finding insufficient procedural formality, and ordered the case redesignated as a Mandatory Settlement Conference for Monrovia to be formally joined and the application amended.

Petition for RemovalWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardCity of MonroviaPermissibly Self-InsuredOpinion and Order Granting Petition for RemovalDecision After RemovalApplicantIndustrial InjuryRespiratory SystemCumulative Trauma
References
1
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

United States v. Greater Blouse, Skirt & Neck-Wear Contractors Ass'n

The defendant, Slate Belt, moved to vacate a notice of voluntary dismissal filed by the plaintiff, the Government, under Rule 41(a)(1)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Slate Belt argued the dismissal was not at an 'early stage' and would cause prejudice, despite never having filed an answer. The court found that no joinder of issue occurred, and the merits of the controversy were never presented or passed upon by the court. Extended private negotiations between the parties regarding a proposed decree were not considered the equivalent of an answer or court action on the merits, nor did incurred legal fees constitute sufficient prejudice. Consequently, the court held that the plaintiff was within its rights to file the voluntary dismissal, and the defendant's motion to vacate was denied.

Voluntary dismissalRule 41(a)(1)(i)Federal Rules of Civil ProcedureSherman ActJoinder of issuePrejudiceMeritsNegotiationsDistrict CourtMotion practice
References
2
Case No. ADJ1243572 (OAK 0342959)
Regular
Oct 30, 2013

MARIA ESTEBAN vs. WELLS FARGO BANK

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted Wells Fargo's Petition for Removal, rescinding the WCJ's order to take the case off calendar. The Board found that the applicant's stated strategic decision to pursue further discovery after the mandatory settlement conference violated Labor Code section 5502(d)(3), which closes discovery at that point. Therefore, the case was returned to the trial level for a new mandatory settlement conference, with discovery to close as of February 4, 2013. Commissioner Brass dissented, arguing removal was an extraordinary remedy not warranted here.

Petition for RemovalDeclaration of Readiness to ProceedMandatory Settlement ConferenceDiscovery ClosureVocational EvidenceDue DiligenceRescinded OrderPanel Qualified Medical EvaluatorsTotal DisabilityIndustrial Injury
References
2
Case No. ADJ10477247
Regular
Oct 31, 2017

ESTELA WALLE vs. THE PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP

Here's a summary of the two cases for a lawyer, in max four sentences each: **Case 1: Estela Walle vs. The Permanente Medical Group (ADJ10477247)** The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration, affirming the WCJ's finding that the applicant did not sustain a back injury arising out of and in the course of employment. The Board gave significant weight to the WCJ's credibility determination, finding no substantial evidence to warrant overturning it. Therefore, the applicant was awarded nothing on her claim. **Case 2: Estela Walle vs. The Permanente Medical Group (ADJ8620015, ADJ9183471)** The Appeals Board rescinded the WCJ's award for psychiatric injury and returned the case to the trial level for further proceedings. The Board found the analysis of whether the injury was predominantly caused by employment events, and specifically by lawful, good faith personnel actions, to be inadequate under *Rolda*. Further development of the record is required to clarify the events of May 21, 2012, and to determine the precise causal contribution of employment-related factors versus good faith personnel actions.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationFindings and OrderApplicantInjury Arising Out of and In the Course of EmploymentAOE/COEBack InjuryWCJCredibility DeterminationGarza v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd.
References
1
Showing 1-10 of 17,764 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational