CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Claim of Pinto v. Southport Correctional Facility

Claimant, a teacher at a maximum-security correctional facility, experienced severe head pains and disorientation, leading to a claim for workers' compensation benefits for work-related stress, depression, headaches, and memory loss. The Workers’ Compensation Board disallowed the claim, finding the presumption of work-related injury rebutted and concluding that the stress experienced was not greater than that usually encountered in his work environment. On appeal, the court affirmed the Board’s decision to deny the claim on the merits. While the court disagreed with the Board's finding that the claim was barred by Workers’ Compensation Law § 2 (7) due to personnel decisions, it upheld the Board's alternate basis for denial, stating that the claimant failed to show the stress was beyond what similarly situated workers experienced.

Workers' CompensationStress-related injuryMental injuryCausationPresumption of injuryRebuttal of presumptionPersonnel decisionWork environmentCorrectional facilityTeacher
References
14
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Feb 06, 2004

Claim of Mason v. Reunion Industries, Inc.

The case involves an appeal from a Workers’ Compensation Board decision denying benefits to a claimant for work-induced stress exacerbating a preexisting panic disorder and depression. The Board had ruled that the stress was typical to the work environment and not causally related, also citing Workers’ Compensation Law § 2 (7). The appellate court disagreed with the Board's interpretation of § 2 (7) as a bar. However, the court affirmed the denial of benefits, finding substantial evidence supported the Board's conclusions that the stress was not unusual for the work environment and that there was no causal connection between the work stressors and the claimant's condition, crediting the employer's expert medical opinion.

Workers' CompensationMental HealthStressPanic DisorderDepressionCausationExpert TestimonySubstantial EvidenceAppellate ReviewMedical Opinion
References
8
Case No. 535536
Regular Panel Decision
Jul 20, 2023

In the Matter of the Claim of Sheldon Matthews

Sheldon Matthews, a train conductor, appealed a decision by the Workers' Compensation Board, which disallowed his claim for benefits. Matthews alleged that his high-risk exposure to coronavirus and an unsafe work environment exacerbated his pre-existing psychiatric conditions, causing anxiety. His treating psychologist, Michelle Dziedzic, and a long-term psychiatrist opined that his conditions were exacerbated by work-related COVID-19 fears and lack of safety measures. However, a Workers' Compensation Law Judge (WCLJ) and subsequently the Board found that the stress experienced by Matthews was not greater than that of similarly situated workers during the pandemic, which is a requirement for compensability of mental injuries arising from work-related stress. The Appellate Division affirmed the Board's decision, concluding that substantial evidence supported the finding that his fear of contracting COVID-19 and his work environment did not result in stress greater than that experienced by other train operators during the pandemic, especially since he did not contract the virus.

AnxietyDepressionPTSDCOVID-19Work-Related StressMental Health InjuryCompensabilityTrain ConductorPersonal Protective EquipmentExacerbated Preexisting Condition
References
20
Case No. 525286
Regular Panel Decision
Dec 06, 2018

Matter of Karam v. Rensselaer County Sheriff's Dept.

James J. Karam, a former Lieutenant with the Rensselaer County Sheriff's Department, appealed decisions by the Workers' Compensation Board that denied his claim for benefits, ruling he did not suffer a causally-related mental injury. Karam alleged work-related posttraumatic stress disorder and major depressive disorder stemming from a stressful and discriminatory work environment. The Board affirmed the disallowance, concluding Karam did not experience stress beyond that of a normal work environment and finding his testimony incredible. The Appellate Division affirmed the Board's decisions, upholding its factual findings and credibility assessments, and finding no error in the denial of reconsideration.

Mental InjuryPosttraumatic Stress DisorderMajor Depressive DisorderWorkplace StressCredibility AssessmentAppellate ReviewWorkers' Compensation Board DecisionAdministrative LawEmployment DiscriminationHarassment Claims
References
14
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Yarde v. Good Samaritan Hospital

This decision addresses motions for summary judgment in a case involving claims of racially-motivated discharge, hostile work environment, and unfair representation. Plaintiff, a black nurse named Yarde, was terminated from Good Samaritan Hospital (GSH) for breaching patient confidentiality and failing to attend investigatory meetings. The court dismissed her claims of discriminatory and retaliatory discharge against GSH, as well as all claims against her union (1199 SEIU) and its representative Lorraine Freiberg, finding no sufficient evidence of discrimination, retaliation, or unfair representation. However, the court denied GSH's motion for summary judgment regarding Yarde's hostile work environment claim against GSH and its employees Elizabeth Burton and Linda Bassi, allowing that specific claim to proceed to trial due to unresolved factual disputes concerning racial remarks and differential treatment.

Summary JudgmentRacial DiscriminationHostile Work EnvironmentUnfair RepresentationPatient Confidentiality BreachWorkplace RetaliationEmployment LawUnion GrievanceNurse TerminationChemical Dependency Unit
References
36
Case No. 698 F.Supp. 452
Regular Panel Decision
Jan 01, 1988

Tunis v. Corning Glass Works

Catherine Tunis, a process engineer at Corning Glass, filed a lawsuit alleging sex discrimination and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. She claimed a hostile work environment due to pinup photographs, gender-based language, and catcalls, and that her termination was in retaliation for her complaints and an EEOC filing. The court found that the employer took prompt and reasonable remedial action regarding the hostile environment claims. Additionally, the court determined that Tunis failed to demonstrate that the legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons provided by Corning Glass for her termination were merely a pretext for discrimination. Consequently, all of Tunis's claims were dismissed, and judgment was entered in favor of the defendant.

Sex DiscriminationHostile Work EnvironmentRetaliationTitle VIICivil Rights ActEmployment DiscriminationWorkplace HarassmentGender BiasWrongful TerminationFederal Lawsuit
References
12
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Nov 05, 2002

Claim of Potter v. Curtis Lumber Co.

The claimant's decedent, a former marketing design manager for Curtis Lumber, committed suicide after experiencing work-related stress. The Workers’ Compensation Board awarded the claimant death benefits, finding the suicide was precipitated by a depressive illness causally linked to severe workplace stress. Curtis Lumber and its workers' compensation carrier appealed, arguing the stress was not greater than that usually found in a normal work environment and that lawful personnel decisions caused the suicide. The Appellate Division affirmed the Board's decision, concluding that the testimony of a board-certified psychiatrist provided substantial evidence that the decedent's suicide was causally related to abnormal work-related stress and implicitly rejecting the carrier's defense under Workers’ Compensation Law § 2 (7).

SuicideWork-Related StressDepressive IllnessWorkers' Compensation Death BenefitsCausal RelationshipSubstantial EvidenceMedical Expert TestimonyPersonnel DecisionsAppellate ReviewAffirmed Decision
References
11
Case No. 535458
Regular Panel Decision
Jul 20, 2023

In the Matter of the Claim of Bolot Djanuzakov

Claimant, a bus driver, sought workers' compensation benefits for work-related stress and mental health injuries due to exposure to COVID-19, coworker illness/death, employment conditions, and treatment by others. His treating clinical psychologist diagnosed major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder, finding him temporarily totally disabled. However, the Workers' Compensation Law Judge disallowed the claim, finding his work-related stress was not greater than that experienced by similarly situated workers during the pandemic. The Workers' Compensation Board affirmed this decision, which was further affirmed by the Appellate Division. The court upheld that claimant failed to demonstrate exceptional stress beyond normal workplace encounters for bus operators and rejected that an abnormal work environment alone satisfies the compensability test.

Mental Health InjuryWork-Related StressCOVID-19 ImpactBus Operator ClaimWorkers' Compensation BenefitsStress ThresholdSimilarly Situated WorkersAppellate DivisionPsychological InjuryCausation
References
12
Case No. ADJ10452924
Regular
Sep 05, 2018

ANN MALESZA vs. MARIN WALDORF SCHOOL, CHURCH MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

This case involves a dispute over temporary disability indemnity for Ann Malesza, who claimed injury to her heart and psyche. The defendant sought to limit temporary disability to 4-6 weeks, challenging the reliance on Dr. Taylor's psychiatric evaluation. The Appeals Board affirmed the WCJ's award of up to 104 weeks of temporary disability. This decision was based on Dr. Taylor's finding that the applicant was unable to work due to severe anxiety and phobia of returning to a stressful environment, which the Board deemed substantial evidence. The defendant's inability to provide a stress-free work environment does not relieve their liability for temporary disability.

WCABAnn MaleszaMarin Waldorf SchoolChurch Mutual Insurance CompanyADJ10452924Opinion and Decision After ReconsiderationFindings and AwardWCJAOE/COEheart injury
References
0
Case No. CV-23-0854
Regular Panel Decision
Jan 16, 2025

In the Matter of the Claim of Jenise Waddy

Claimant Jenise M. Waddy, a transit bus operator, appealed a Workers' Compensation Board decision that disallowed her claim for posttraumatic stress disorder benefits. Waddy alleged PTSD after an incident where an unidentified man vandalized her bus and verbally threatened her. A Workers' Compensation Law Judge initially awarded benefits, but the Board reversed, finding Waddy failed to prove her stress was greater than that experienced by similarly situated bus operators. The Appellate Division affirmed the Board's decision, concluding that the incident, while disturbing, could reasonably and ordinarily be expected in a bus operator's normal work environment, and therefore was not a compensable accident under workers' compensation law. A dissenting opinion argued that such dangerous conduct should not be considered part of a normal work environment.

Workers' CompensationPosttraumatic Stress DisorderBus OperatorWorkplace AccidentPsychological InjuryStressorNormal Work EnvironmentSubstantial EvidenceAppellate ReviewThird Judicial Department
References
11
Showing 1-10 of 6,995 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational