CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ3133261 (VNO 0400017)
Regular
Aug 17, 2010

FELIPE TOLENTINO vs. CONCO CEMENT, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, XCHANGING INC., FREMONT COMPENSATION

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the lien claimant's petition for reconsideration as premature. The WCAB granted the defendant's petition for reconsideration regarding the temporary disability overpayment issue, deferring it for further proceedings. The Board affirmed the WCJ's findings on injury causation and permanent disability but amended the decision to clarify the overpayment issue. Finally, the WCAB issued a notice of intention to sanction defendant's counsel for attaching and citing unadmitted evidence.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardFELIPE TOLENTINOCONCO CEMENTCALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATIONXCHANGING INC.FREMONT COMPENSATIONliquidationADJ3133261VNO 0400017OPINION AND ORDERS DISMISSING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND GRANTING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION
References
Case No. ADJ14244909
Regular
Apr 25, 2025

YONGQUAN HU vs. AMERICAN ALLIANCE LOGISTICS, INC., LIANG YE, UNINSURED EMPLOYERS BENEFITS TRUST FUND

Applicant Yongquan Hu and defendant Uninsured Employers Benefits Trust Fund (UEBTF) both petitioned for reconsideration of an Amended Findings and Award. The WCJ's initial decision found an industrial injury resulting in permanent total disability and calculated average weekly earnings based on multiple employers. Applicant disputed the wage calculation method, while UEBTF identified an inadvertently omitted week of wages. The Appeals Board granted both petitions, adopting the WCJ's report and amending the decision to reflect corrected average weekly earnings of $1,462.15, leading to a temporary and permanent total disability rate of $974.77 per week.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardYongquan HuAmerican Alliance LogisticsInc.Uninsured Employers Benefits Trust FundAdjudication NumberVan Nuys District OfficeOpinion and OrderGranting Petitions for ReconsiderationDecision After Reconsideration
References
Case No. ADJ8128282
Regular
Jan 23, 2014

ANGELA EGBIKUADJE vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATIONS, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and rescinded a prior award, returning the case for further proceedings. The defendant, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, argued that the applicant's psychiatric injury claim was preempted by the ADA and not proven under Labor Code section 3208.3. The Board found the original decision lacked proper analysis regarding predominant industrial causation and the good faith personnel action defense. Therefore, the case was remanded for further development of the record, including expert medical opinion on these issues.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardAngela EgbikuadjeCalifornia Department of Corrections and RehabilitationLegally UninsuredState Compensation Insurance FundADJ8128282Van Nuys District OfficeReconsiderationFindings and AwardIndustrial cumulative trauma injury
References
Case No. ADJ9387304
Regular
Jan 20, 2023

Juan Guzman vs. ADP TOTAL SOURCE, INC./DURACITE, HELMSMAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES

Applicant sought reconsideration of a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decision finding a 45% permanent partial disability for a 2013 injury. Applicant contended the injury caused permanent total disability, not partial. The Board granted reconsideration and the parties subsequently reached a settlement via a Compromise and Release agreement. The Board rescinded the original decision and remanded the case to the WCJ to consider the settlement, reserving judgment on the merits of the reconsideration petition.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardJuan GuzmanADP Total SourceHelmsman Management Serviceslumbar spine injuryhead injurypsyche injurygranite edge fabricatorpermanent partial disabilitypermanent total disability
References
Case No. ADJ4462136 (MON 0357470)
Regular
Dec 14, 2015

MARTIN REYES vs. CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION/CVS PHARMACY, AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE

This Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decision reversed a prior finding of 98% permanent partial disability for Martin Reyes, awarding him 100% permanent total disability after a stroke. The Board found error in the exclusion of applicant's treating physician reports and determined that psychiatric disability, even with a 5% non-industrial apportionment, combined with other impairments, resulted in total disability. The decision also addressed the admissibility of medical reports and the mootness of vocational rehabilitation arguments given the ultimate finding of permanent total disability.

Permanent Total DisabilityPsychiatric InjuryApportionmentSubstantial EvidenceMedical OpinionQualified Medical ExaminerVocational RehabilitationSelf-Procured TreatmentStrokeVascular Dementia
References
Case No. ADJ10544667
Regular
Nov 15, 2019

NEREYDA VARGAS vs. WELLS FARGO BANK NORTH AMERICA, OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a decision finding no industrial psychiatric injury. The Board found the original decision failed to conduct the multi-level analysis required by *Rolda v. Pitney Bowes, Inc.* concerning actual employment events and lawful, good faith personnel actions. The case is returned to the trial level for further development and analysis to determine if actual employment events predominated the injury and if any lawful personnel actions were a substantial cause. The Workers' Compensation Judge must specifically address all alleged events, medical evidence, and potential inconsistencies in the Qualified Medical Evaluator's reports.

psychiatric injurycumulative traumaRolda analysispredominant causelawful personnel actionnondiscriminatorygood faithactual events of employmentpredicate eventsmedical evidence
References
Case No. ADJ8489468
Regular
Jun 15, 2018

ROLE BRODIE vs. AEROTEK COMMERCIAL STAFFING, ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY

This case involves a workers' compensation claim by Roly Brodie against Aerotek Commercial Staffing and its insurer. The applicant was found to have sustained injuries to multiple body parts, including bilateral wrists, back, shoulders, neck, psyche, and hands, resulting in temporary total disability and a need for further medical treatment. The defendant petitioned for reconsideration, challenging only the finding of permanent and total disability ($100\%$) due to alleged lack of applicant credibility. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed the original award, upholding the finding of permanent and total disability.

Findings of FactAward and OrdersPetition for ReconsiderationWCJcumulative periodtemporary total disabilitypermanent and total disabilitysubstantial evidenceapplicant's lack of credibilityReport and Recommendation on Petition for Reconsideration
References
Case No. ADJ9466180
Regular
Sep 28, 2017

Erin Inman vs. VENTURA REGIONAL SANITATION DISTRICT

The applicant, Erin Inman, seeks reconsideration of a prior award finding 73% permanent disability due to a cumulative trauma injury to her left wrist resulting in reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD). She contends she is totally disabled, citing the Agreed Medical Examiner (AME) Dr. Sohn's opinion that she cannot use either hand and is therefore conclusively presumed totally disabled under Labor Code section 4662(a). The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to further develop the medical record. The Board found Dr. Sohn's opinion on total disability was not yet definitive as he repeatedly recommended a pain management evaluation and reserved judgment pending its outcome. Therefore, the determination of permanent disability and attorney fees is deferred pending a pain management evaluation and subsequent opinion from the AME.

Reflex Sympathetic DystrophyCumulative TraumaPermanent Total DisabilityAgreed Medical ExaminerPain Management PhysicianBody Parts AffectedLabor Code Section 4662Permanent Disability RatingMedical Record DevelopmentPetition for Reconsideration
References
Case No. ADJ2308109 (OAK 0275439) ADJ01058712 (OAK 0275438)
Regular
Apr 29, 2011

LINDA BURT-FOSS vs. CHILDREN'S FAIRYLAND, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

This case involves a workers' compensation claim for a zoo keeper injured in 1999. The applicant sustained a left foot and ankle injury that led to a Charcot foot condition, resulting in total permanent disability. The defendant argued for apportionment of disability, citing a medical opinion suggesting pre-existing conditions contributed to the Charcot foot. However, the Board affirmed the applicant's total permanent disability, finding the industrial injury was a contributing cause and therefore not subject to apportionment. The Board also found that the defendant waived issues regarding the overlap of disabilities from prior knee injuries by failing to raise them in their petition for reconsideration.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardJoint Findings and AwardReconsiderationPermanent Total DisabilityApportionmentAgreed Medical EvaluatorCharcot footIndustrial InjuryInciting EventCompensable Consequence
References
Case No. ADJ3167944
Regular
Mar 21, 2011

NEFTALY HEREDIA vs. UNION TRANSPORTATION, INC., SEDGWICK CIAGA GLENDALE

This case involves a claim for workers' compensation benefits for a psychiatric injury allegedly sustained on June 18, 2001. The primary issue is whether the applicant's injury meets the "sudden and extraordinary employment condition" exception to the six-month employment requirement for psychiatric claims under Labor Code section 3208.3(d). The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the previous award, and returned the matter for further proceedings. The Board found the Workers' Compensation Judge applied an incorrect "taint of fraud" standard and needs to re-evaluate whether the incident was truly uncommon, unusual, and unexpected. Furthermore, the Board directed the Judge to address issues of symptom magnification and malingering raised by the psychiatric reports.

Sudden and extraordinary employment conditionLabor Code section 3208.3(d)psychiatric injuryQualified Medical Evaluator (QME)symptom magnificationmalingeringpreponderance of the evidenceindustrial injuryamended findings and awardreconsideration
References
Showing 1-10 of 1,522 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational