CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Yeshiva University v. New England Educational Institute, Inc.

In a Lanham Act action, defendants, who prevailed after a jury trial against plaintiff Yeshiva, sought approximately $50,000 in attorney's fees. The application presented a novel question: whether a prevailing defendant is entitled to fees when the plaintiff's liability claims were asserted in good faith but the damage claims were grossly exaggerated. The court first affirmed the applicability of the Lanham Act's attorney fee provision, § 35(a), to actions involving unregistered marks, citing precedent. Despite acknowledging the plaintiff's highly exaggerated damage claims, the court determined that the case, which was close on the merits regarding the initial copying allegations, did not meet the 'exceptional cases' standard required for awarding attorney's fees to a prevailing defendant. Consequently, the defendants' application for attorney's fees was denied.

Lanham ActAttorney's FeesPrevailing DefendantExceptional CasesUnregistered MarkDamage ClaimsExaggerated DamagesGood Faith LitigationJury VerdictNon-profit Dispute
References
7
Case No. ADJ2567272 (AHM 0105012)
Regular
Oct 15, 2012

, Applicant, FELIX NINO MOTA vs. ALLGREEN LANDSCAPE; NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Administered by FARA Adjusting Services

Applicant's attorneys requested $51,900 in attorney's fees under Labor Code Section 5801 for work related to a writ of review. The Appeals Board found the declarations supporting the request inadequate due to lack of itemization and justification for the hours and rates. Consequently, the Board may award a fee of up to $16,000, but reserves the right to award substantially less or nothing at all due to the potentially inflated nature of the initial request. Applicant's attorneys must provide detailed itemizations and show good cause to receive any fee.

Labor Code section 5801attorney's feespetition for writ of reviewAppeals Boarddeclarationsitemized billingshourly ratecertified workers' compensation specialistclerical tasksunreasonably inflated
References
9
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Castleberry v. Hudson Valley Asphalt Corp.

This case concerns an application by a plaintiff, injured in 1973, for the apportionment of attorney's fees incurred in a third-party action. The plaintiff, who receives weekly workers' compensation benefits from Utica Mutual Insurance Co., secured a $75,000 settlement after an initial judgment was set aside on appeal. The central issue was whether the compensation carrier, Utica Mutual, should bear the full amount of the attorney's fees for the $75,000 settlement, thereby vacating its $20,402 lien. The court, exercising its discretion under Workers’ Compensation Law § 29, determined that since the entire settlement benefited the carrier by reducing its future obligations, the carrier should be responsible for all attorney's fees, and its lien was consequently vacated.

Attorney's Fees ApportionmentLien VacationThird-Party SettlementInsurance Carrier LiabilityWorkers' Compensation Law § 29Subrogation RightsEquitable ApportionmentJudicial DiscretionStatutory BenefitWorkers' Compensation Benefits
References
0
Case No. ADJ2478986 (SAC 0326370)
Regular
Oct 07, 2014

LINDA FUNK vs. DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIFORNIA, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

This case involves an award of additional attorney's fees to the applicant's attorneys following a successful defense of a Petition for Writ of Review. The Court of Appeal remanded the case for the Board to determine reasonable fees for appellate services. The applicant's attorneys requested $4,160.00, and the Board awarded $3,840.00, disallowing time spent on fee preparation. This award is made in addition to any other compensation owed to the applicant.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardAttorney's FeePetition for Writ of ReviewCourt of AppealLabor Code § 5801Supplemental AwardCertified Workers' Compensation SpecialistAppellate Attorney's FeesLiberty Mutual Insurance CompanyDelta Dental Plan
References
2
Case No. ADJ10307427
Regular
Mar 21, 2017

CHRISTOPHER DEVEREUX vs. STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, Permissibly Self-Insured; administered by THE HARTFORD

This case concerns an award of additional attorney's fees for applicant's counsel, pursuant to Labor Code § 5801. The Third District Court of Appeal remanded the matter for this purpose after denying the defendant's Petition for Writ of Review. The parties stipulated to reasonable attorney's fees of $2,500.00. The Board has issued an award of these appellate attorney's fees in favor of the applicant's counsel, payable in addition to any compensation awarded to the applicant.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardLabor Code § 5801attorney's feesPetition for Writ of Reviewappellate attorney's feesstipulationawardState Compensation Insurance FundThe Hartfordremanded
References
1
Case No. ADJ10483516, ADJ6690853, ADJ886741 (POM 0300434)
Regular
May 02, 2018

CAROLINE JOHNSON vs. CAREMARK RX, INC.; TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA

The Court of Appeal remanded this case to the Appeals Board to award additional attorney's fees to the applicant's attorney for services rendered in opposing the defendant's Petition for Writ of Review. The applicant's attorney sought $9,200.00 for 23 hours of work at $400.00 per hour. After reviewing the petition and considering factors like time, effort, skill, and complexity, the Appeals Board awarded the full requested amount of $9,200.00 in attorney's fees. This award is in addition to any other compensation due to the applicant.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for Writ of ReviewSupplemental attorney's feesLabor Code § 5801Court of Appealappellate attorney's feesapplicant's attorneyhourly ratereasonable feesremand
References
2
Case No. AHM 108812 AHM 108813 AHM 108814
Regular
Nov 06, 2007

OLIVIA ZAVALA vs. METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT

This case involves an award of attorney's fees under Labor Code § 5801 following a successful defense against the defendant's Petition for Writ of Review. The Court of Appeal remanded the matter for the Board to determine reasonable attorney's fees for the applicant's counsel's services. The applicant's attorney requested $5,171.89, but both parties ultimately stipulated to a total of $5,000.00 for attorney's fees and appellate costs.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardAttorney's FeeLabor Code § 5801Petition for Writ of ReviewCourt of AppealStipulationAppellate CostsMetropolitan Water DistrictReasonable Attorney's Fees
References
1
Case No. ADJ1978559
Regular
Feb 03, 2017

JACKIE ABRAMIAN vs. GLENDALE ADVENTIST MEDICAL CENTER

The Court of Appeal ordered the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) to award attorney's fees to applicant's counsel for successfully defending against the defendant's petition for writ of review. The applicant's counsel sought $4,850.00 in fees and $141.87 in costs. Both parties stipulated to these amounts as reasonable. The WCAB has now issued an award for these additional attorney's fees and costs, payable to applicant's counsel, Scott B. Solis.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDGlendale Adventist Medical CenterOpinion and AwardAttorney's FeesPetition for Writ of ReviewLabor Code section 5801Labor Code section 5811RemandStipulationAppellate Attorney's Fees
References
1
Case No. ADJ3670273 (STK 0188965)
Regular
Dec 27, 2013

ROBERT CRANE vs. SMT RESOURCE/GRANITE STATE INSURANCE COMPANY, as administered by CHARTIS CLAIMS, INC.

This case involves a request for supplemental attorney's fees for services rendered in appealing a workers' compensation decision. The Court of Appeal previously remanded the case to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) to determine reasonable fees for the applicant's attorney. The applicant's attorney requested $7,652.00 for 19.13 hours of work at $400 per hour. The WCAB found this amount reasonable and awarded it to the applicant's attorneys, Rockwell, Kelly & Duarte, LLP.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for Writ of ReviewCourt of AppealSupplemental Attorney's FeeLabor Code § 5801Appellate ServicesReasonable Attorney FeesPetition for Writ of ReviewTime SpentHourly Rate
References
0
Case No. ADJ10065068
Regular
May 02, 2018

JOHN LAMBERT vs. COUNTY OF KERN

This case concerns a supplemental award of attorney's fees to the applicant's attorney. Following the denial of the defendant's Petition for Writ of Review by the Court of Appeal, the matter was remanded for this specific purpose. The applicant's attorney submitted a petition requesting \$9,765.00 for 27.9 hours of work at \$350 per hour in opposing the writ. Without objection from the defendant and after considering the reasonableness of the requested fees, the Appeals Board awarded the full \$9,765.00 in appellate attorney's fees.

Labor Code § 5801additional attorney's feessupplemental awardPetition for Writ of ReviewCourt of Appealappellate attorney's feestime loghourly ratecase-by-case basismerits of appellate work
References
1
Showing 1-10 of 15,109 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational