CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Yeshiva University v. New England Educational Institute, Inc.

In a Lanham Act action, defendants, who prevailed after a jury trial against plaintiff Yeshiva, sought approximately $50,000 in attorney's fees. The application presented a novel question: whether a prevailing defendant is entitled to fees when the plaintiff's liability claims were asserted in good faith but the damage claims were grossly exaggerated. The court first affirmed the applicability of the Lanham Act's attorney fee provision, § 35(a), to actions involving unregistered marks, citing precedent. Despite acknowledging the plaintiff's highly exaggerated damage claims, the court determined that the case, which was close on the merits regarding the initial copying allegations, did not meet the 'exceptional cases' standard required for awarding attorney's fees to a prevailing defendant. Consequently, the defendants' application for attorney's fees was denied.

Lanham ActAttorney's FeesPrevailing DefendantExceptional CasesUnregistered MarkDamage ClaimsExaggerated DamagesGood Faith LitigationJury VerdictNon-profit Dispute
References
7
Case No. ADJ174481 (SAL 0095964)
Regular
Nov 19, 2008

LAURA WILLIAMS-WELTY vs. TILE WEST, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration regarding the 27% permanent disability finding, upholding the WCJ's reliance on the Agreed Medical Evaluator's report. However, the Board granted the applicant's attorney's petition to correct a clerical error regarding his fee. The WCJ's award of $2,750 was amended to reflect a 15% attorney's fee, acknowledging the attorney's extensive work and successful outcomes for the applicant over several years.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationFindings and AwardIndustrial InjuryPermanent DisabilityApportionmentAgreed Medical EvaluatorSubstantial EvidenceAttorney's FeePetition to Correct Clerical Error
References
2
Case No. ADJ5690219
Regular
Jul 31, 2015

TOM PALLADINO vs. ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, INTERCARE INSURANCE SERVICES

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a prior award and issued a notice of intention to impose sanctions on applicant's attorney. This action stems from alleged false, misleading, and unsubstantiated allegations made by the attorney in the applicant's Answer to the Petition for Reconsideration. The Board found no evidence to support the claims of intentional delay by the defendant and determined the attorney's statements to be without merit and potentially prejudicial. The attorney and his firm face a $750 sanction unless good cause is shown why it should not be imposed.

WCABPetition for ReconsiderationFindings and AwardQualified Medical EvaluatorPermanent DisabilityApportionmentSanctionsLabor Code Section 5813WCAB Rule 10561Attorney Misconduct
References
0
Case No. ADJ2567272 (AHM 0105012)
Regular
Oct 15, 2012

, Applicant, FELIX NINO MOTA vs. ALLGREEN LANDSCAPE; NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Administered by FARA Adjusting Services

Applicant's attorneys requested $51,900 in attorney's fees under Labor Code Section 5801 for work related to a writ of review. The Appeals Board found the declarations supporting the request inadequate due to lack of itemization and justification for the hours and rates. Consequently, the Board may award a fee of up to $16,000, but reserves the right to award substantially less or nothing at all due to the potentially inflated nature of the initial request. Applicant's attorneys must provide detailed itemizations and show good cause to receive any fee.

Labor Code section 5801attorney's feespetition for writ of reviewAppeals Boarddeclarationsitemized billingshourly ratecertified workers' compensation specialistclerical tasksunreasonably inflated
References
9
Case No. ADJ6822451
Regular
Feb 26, 2014

JIMMAR WEBB vs. RALPHS GROCERY CO., SEDGWICK CMS INC.

In *Jimmar Webb v. Ralphs Grocery Co.*, the Appeals Board affirmed a WCJ's award of temporary and permanent disability benefits for a lumbar spine injury resulting in psychiatric and sleep disorders. The applicant's attorney sought reconsideration based on alleged apportionment errors, but the Board found no apportionment was applied in the original award. Consequently, the Appeals Board, on its own motion, granted removal and issued a notice of intent to impose sanctions on the applicant's attorneys for filing a frivolous petition intended to reopen the record.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationFindings and AwardIndustrial InjuryLumbar SpinePsychiatric DisorderSleep DisorderCompensable ConsequenceTemporary DisabilityPermanent Disability
References
1
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Castleberry v. Hudson Valley Asphalt Corp.

This case concerns an application by a plaintiff, injured in 1973, for the apportionment of attorney's fees incurred in a third-party action. The plaintiff, who receives weekly workers' compensation benefits from Utica Mutual Insurance Co., secured a $75,000 settlement after an initial judgment was set aside on appeal. The central issue was whether the compensation carrier, Utica Mutual, should bear the full amount of the attorney's fees for the $75,000 settlement, thereby vacating its $20,402 lien. The court, exercising its discretion under Workers’ Compensation Law § 29, determined that since the entire settlement benefited the carrier by reducing its future obligations, the carrier should be responsible for all attorney's fees, and its lien was consequently vacated.

Attorney's Fees ApportionmentLien VacationThird-Party SettlementInsurance Carrier LiabilityWorkers' Compensation Law § 29Subrogation RightsEquitable ApportionmentJudicial DiscretionStatutory BenefitWorkers' Compensation Benefits
References
0
Case No. ADJ10483516, ADJ6690853, ADJ886741 (POM 0300434)
Regular
May 02, 2018

CAROLINE JOHNSON vs. CAREMARK RX, INC.; TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA

The Court of Appeal remanded this case to the Appeals Board to award additional attorney's fees to the applicant's attorney for services rendered in opposing the defendant's Petition for Writ of Review. The applicant's attorney sought $9,200.00 for 23 hours of work at $400.00 per hour. After reviewing the petition and considering factors like time, effort, skill, and complexity, the Appeals Board awarded the full requested amount of $9,200.00 in attorney's fees. This award is in addition to any other compensation due to the applicant.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for Writ of ReviewSupplemental attorney's feesLabor Code § 5801Court of Appealappellate attorney's feesapplicant's attorneyhourly ratereasonable feesremand
References
2
Case No. ADJ237189 (RIV 0058701)
Regular
May 22, 2009

DONALD K. SMITH vs. CITY OF SANTA ANA

This case concerns an applicant's attorney's petition for reconsideration regarding appellate costs and attorney's fees. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed its prior decision, which had affirmed the finding of industrial injury to the heart and prostate but barred the skin cancer claim due to the statute of limitations. The Board ordered the applicant's attorney to reimburse the applicant $390 improperly solicited and received, while ordering the defendant to pay appellate costs of $382.79 upon confirmation of the reimbursement. The Board declined to increase the attorney's fee, finding it already exceeded typical ranges and that the attorney had not demonstrated entitlement to more.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationRemittiturStatute of LimitationsSkin CancerHeart InjuryProstate CancerPermanent DisabilityAttorney's FeeAppellate Costs
References
2
Case No. ADJ3670273 (STK 0188965)
Regular
Dec 27, 2013

ROBERT CRANE vs. SMT RESOURCE/GRANITE STATE INSURANCE COMPANY, as administered by CHARTIS CLAIMS, INC.

This case involves a request for supplemental attorney's fees for services rendered in appealing a workers' compensation decision. The Court of Appeal previously remanded the case to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) to determine reasonable fees for the applicant's attorney. The applicant's attorney requested $7,652.00 for 19.13 hours of work at $400 per hour. The WCAB found this amount reasonable and awarded it to the applicant's attorneys, Rockwell, Kelly & Duarte, LLP.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for Writ of ReviewCourt of AppealSupplemental Attorney's FeeLabor Code § 5801Appellate ServicesReasonable Attorney FeesPetition for Writ of ReviewTime SpentHourly Rate
References
0
Case No. ADJ2478986 (SAC 0326370)
Regular
Oct 07, 2014

LINDA FUNK vs. DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIFORNIA, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

This case involves an award of additional attorney's fees to the applicant's attorneys following a successful defense of a Petition for Writ of Review. The Court of Appeal remanded the case for the Board to determine reasonable fees for appellate services. The applicant's attorneys requested $4,160.00, and the Board awarded $3,840.00, disallowing time spent on fee preparation. This award is made in addition to any other compensation owed to the applicant.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardAttorney's FeePetition for Writ of ReviewCourt of AppealLabor Code § 5801Supplemental AwardCertified Workers' Compensation SpecialistAppellate Attorney's FeesLiberty Mutual Insurance CompanyDelta Dental Plan
References
2
Showing 1-10 of 14,402 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational