CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Claim of Green v. Kamalian

A decedent, hired by an employer to cut firewood, was killed by a falling tree. His widow, as administratrix of his estate, filed a wrongful death action against the employer, which resulted in a $65,000 settlement. Subsequently, the claimant sought death benefits, but the Workers’ Compensation Board denied the claim, citing a precedent that bars benefits after a successful negligence action settlement against the employer. The claimant appealed, arguing that prior cases negated this precedent by vesting primary jurisdiction in the Board, thereby rendering the Supreme Court settlement a nullity. The Appellate Division affirmed the Board’s decision, holding that the rule of primary jurisdiction does not divest the Supreme Court of all jurisdiction in such matters and that the precedent remained binding. The court also rejected the claimant’s argument regarding a lack of identity of parties.

Workers' CompensationWrongful DeathExclusive RemedyPrimary JurisdictionRes JudicataEstate LawAppellate ReviewNew York LawBoard DecisionSettlement Bar
References
7
Case No. ADJ89 12546
Regular
Apr 18, 2016

CARLOS CASTRO, CARLOS CASTRO VICENTE vs. MURANAKA FARMS, ZENITH INSURANCE COMPANY

This case concerns a defendant's petition for reconsideration regarding a lien claimant's copy service fees. The Appeals Board previously granted the lien claimant's petition, finding they were exempt from photocopier registration requirements. This exemption was based on precedent holding that such registration is not required when the lien claimant is an independent contractor of an attorney providing services related to medical-legal expenses. The defendant's petition was denied as the prior en banc decision remains binding precedent.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardLien ClaimantProfessional Photocopier RegistrationBusiness and Professions Code Section 22450Business and Professions Code Section 22451Medical-Legal ExpensesLabor Code Section 4620State Bar MemberIndependent ContractorCornejo v. Younique Café
References
2
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

PMC, Inc. v. Atomergic Chemetals Corp.

This case involves a dispute between PMC, Inc. and Atomergic Chemetals Corporation regarding the arbitrability of an aborted 1989 chemicals sale. PMC, the plaintiff, sought a permanent stay of arbitration and a declaratory judgment that no arbitration agreement exists, arguing that signed documents (a blanket purchase order and a confirmation of sale) were not intended to be binding and that their representative lacked authority. Atomergic moved to dismiss the complaint, compel arbitration, and for summary judgment, contending that the question of contract existence should be decided by an arbitrator. The court, applying Second Circuit precedent, determined that the threshold question of whether a binding contract containing an arbitration agreement was formed must be decided by the court. Consequently, the court denied Atomergic's motion to dismiss or stay, ruling that PMC raised sufficient factual issues regarding contractual intent and agent authority, thus requiring the case to proceed to trial on the issue of arbitrability.

ArbitrationContract LawCommercial DisputeFederal Arbitration ActContract FormationAgent AuthoritySummary JudgmentStay of ArbitrationSecond Circuit PrecedentDispute Resolution
References
16
Case No. OAK 324458
Regular
Nov 16, 2007

CECILIA CASTRO vs. BUILDING SERVICE MAINTENANCE, CRUM & FOSTER

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to address the defendant's contention that temporary disability benefits should be limited. The Board rescinded the original award because the WCJ did not apply the binding precedent of *Hawkins v. Amberwood Products* regarding the commencement date of temporary disability payments. The case is returned to the WCJ for a new decision applying *Hawkins*.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationFindings and AwardTemporary Disability BenefitsLabor Code section 4656(c)(2)Hawkins v. Amberwood ProductsPrecedentWCJRescindedReturned to Trial Level
References
3
Case No. WCK 0071679
Regular
Jan 31, 2008

MARIA GARCIA vs. BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES

This case concerns the application of the 1997 or 2005 Schedule for Permanent Disability ratings. The Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the WCJ's prior findings, and returned the matter to the trial level. This is due to a change in binding legal precedent regarding when a pre-2005 medical report triggers the 1997 Schedule, specifically requiring the report to indicate the existence of permanent disability.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPermanent Disability1997 Schedule2005 ScheduleLabor Code Section 4660(d)Comprehensive Medical-Legal ReportBaglione v. Hertz Car SalesCostco Wholesale v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.ReconsiderationFindings of Fact
References
3
Case No. SAC 0346582
Regular
Aug 07, 2007

JOSE LUIS LOPEZ vs. B & R CONCRETE, INC., ZENITH INSURANCE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) rescinded a prior award finding that the employer's temporary disability payments were limited by Labor Code section 4656(c)(1). The WCAB remanded the case to determine the exact date temporary disability indemnity was first paid. This date is crucial for applying the 104-week limitation within a two-year period as established in the binding *Hawkins* precedent.

Labor Code section 4656(c)(1)temporary disability indemnity104 compensable weekstwo yearsdate of commencement of temporary disability paymentreconsiderationFindings and Awardworkers' compensation administrative law judgeen banc opinionHawkins v. Amberwood Products
References
3
Case No. GOL 0092961; GOL 0092962 GOL 0092963; GOL 0092964 GOL 0092965; GOL 0092966 GOL 0095993; GOL 0096184
Regular
Jun 24, 2008

ANTHONY DERAS vs. JOHN CRAVENS PLASTERING, NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration regarding an insurer's challenge to injury dates and a judge's attempt to retain jurisdiction. The Board affirmed the injury dates, finding the insurer lacked standing on several claims but upheld the specific date range for the primary claim. However, the Board rescinded the judge's reservation of jurisdiction to re-rate permanent disability, emphasizing that binding en banc precedent like the *Benson* decision must be applied.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationFindings and AwardsCumulative TraumaWilkinson DoctrineBenson v. The Permanente Medical GroupEn Banc DecisionPrecedentReservation of JurisdictionPermanent Disability
References
5
Case No. ADJ8772675
Regular
Oct 17, 2017

LUIS MASAYA vs. BRAVO JANITORIAL SERVICES, NORGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY, GUARD INSURANCE WILKES BARRE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinding a prior award of attorney's fees and sanctions against lien claimant Mednet, Inc. While Mednet's lien was indeed untimely under Labor Code section 4903.5, the Board found their pursuit of the lien was not frivolous or in bad faith. This decision was based on the lack of binding precedent regarding the statute of limitations at the time of trial and a good-faith belief in their claim's validity. Consequently, the defendant is not entitled to attorney's fees and sanctions.

Labor Code § 4903.5Lien claimantSanctionsAttorney feesFrivolous pursuitBad faithStatute of limitationsPetition for reconsiderationWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardLabor Code § 5813
References
2
Case No. GRO 0023551, GRO 0025948
Regular
Jun 03, 2008

DOUGLAS FORZETTING vs. OCEANO ICE COMPANY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, By Its Servicing Facility CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED, For FREMONT INSURANCE, In Liquidation

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the applicant's petition for reconsideration to correct clerical errors in the dates of injury for two separate back injuries sustained by the applicant while working for the same employer. The Board affirmed the administrative law judge's decision regarding permanent disability ratings and apportionment, adhering to the binding precedent established in *Benson v. The Permanente Medical Group*. The lien claimant's petition for reconsideration was dismissed as interlocutory orders deferring liens are not final decisions subject to review.

Workers' Compensation Appeals Boardindustrial injurypermanent disabilityapportionmentlien claimantpetition for reconsiderationen banc decisioninterlocutory ordersubstantive rightliability
References
7
Case No. ADJ187153 (AHM 0108802), ADJ2066706 (AHM 0108887)
Regular
May 18, 2009

BEVERLY PHILLIPS vs. WESTERN DIGITAL, SPECIALTY RISK SERVICES

This case involves an appeal regarding vocational rehabilitation maintenance allowance (VRMA) benefits awarded after Labor Code Section 139.5 was repealed. The defendant argued the WCJ lacked jurisdiction due to the repeal, and the applicant was not a qualified injured worker. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration to await a binding en banc decision in *Weiner v. Ralphs Company* on the jurisdictional impact of the repeal. The current award was rescinded and returned to the trial level pending that precedent-setting decision.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardVocational Rehabilitation Maintenance AllowanceLabor Code Section 139.5RepealJurisdictionQualified Injured WorkerReconsiderationEn Banc DecisionWeiner v. Ralphs CompanyAmicus Briefs
References
1
Showing 1-10 of 1,267 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational