CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ1961643
Regular
Sep 22, 2009

STEPHEN PERRYMAN vs. CITY OF SALINAS, JT2 INTEGRATED RESOURCES

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration because it was untimely filed. The defendant's claim of not being served with the award was refuted by proof of service and case law. Even if timely, the petition would have been denied because the defendant failed to meet its burden of proof to establish overlap with a prior award for a cardiac condition. Medical evidence indicated the current cardiac impairment was due to objective findings not present in the prior award.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationAdministrative Law JudgeCity of SalinasJT2 Integrated ResourcesADJ1961643SAL 0116326Untimely FilingAward ServiceCardiac Disability
References
Case No. ADJ4142754 (AHM 0142785) ADJ6726440
Regular
Sep 05, 2013

Joshua Hubbard vs. United Parcel Service, Liberty Mutual Insurance

This case concerns Joshua Hubbard's workers' compensation claims for a cardiac arrest and alleged cumulative trauma. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of the decision to deny Hubbard's claims. The WCJ's report, adopted by the Board, found no medical evidence supported either a cumulative trauma injury or that the specific cardiac arrest arose out of employment. The medical opinions cited by the applicant were found insufficient to establish causation, lacking definitive information regarding work hours and applicable medical theories.

WCABPetition for ReconsiderationDeniedCardiac ArrestCourse of EmploymentArising Out Of EmploymentCumulative TraumaSpecific InjuryMedical EvidenceDr. Dimmick
References
Case No. ADJ2894818 (SRO 0132752)
Regular
Mar 02, 2009

DAVID L. BROWN vs. COUNTY OF MENDOCINO, Permissibly Self-Insured, by CLAIMS MANAGEMENT, INC.

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board rescinded a prior award and returned the case for further proceedings, finding that the administrative law judge erred in issuing an unapportioned permanent disability award. The Board determined that the doctor's report clearly indicated overlap between the applicant's two cardiac impairments, requiring apportionment. While there was no clear evidence for apportionment to the applicant's prior spinal disability, the Board directed the trial level to obtain a new rating that accounts for the duplication in the cardiac conditions. This decision ensures a more accurate and equitable permanent disability assessment by considering the overlap in impairments.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardADJ2894818SRO 0132752David L. BrownCounty of MendocinoClaims Management Inc.ReconsiderationSupplemental Findings Award OrderPermanent DisabilityApportionment
References
Case No. ADJ7555409
Regular
Mar 04, 2014

JESUS ESCANUELA vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, legally uninsured, adjusted by STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration and dismissed the applicant's untimely petition. The WCAB found that the Agreed Medical Examiner's (AME) opinion regarding psychiatric permanent disability was not supported by substantial evidence, as it did not properly address causation under the current PDRS. Consequently, the case is remanded to the trial level for further development of the record concerning psychiatric permanent disability. The WCAB deferred the issue of permanent disability and attorney's fees pending this further development.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardJesus EscanuelaCalifornia Department of Correctionslegally uninsuredState Compensation Insurance FundADJ7555409Fresno District OfficeOpinion and OrderPetition for ReconsiderationFindings and Award
References
Case No. ADJ2140761 (VNO 0544583) ADJ638834 (VNO 0544768)
Regular
May 08, 2018

DENNIS BAJGROWICZ vs. PARAMOUNT PICTURES (psi) administered by MURPHY & BEANE, INC.(tpa)

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the defendant's petition for reconsideration, amending the initial award. The Board found the applicant did not sustain a cardiac injury and reduced the permanent disability rating from 76% to 33%. Consequently, the attorney's fee was also reduced from $30,000.00 to $5,244.00, with the decision largely based on substantial medical evidence from Dr. Hirsch, who reviewed extensive records, over conflicting opinions.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardParamount PicturesMurphy & BeanePetition for ReconsiderationFindings and Awardcervical spinelumbar spineleft shoulderleft hiplower gastrointestinal system
References
Case No. ADJ9771839
Regular
Jan 27, 2020

MICHAEL KARLIS vs. CITY OF GLENDALE

This case involves a firefighter's workers' compensation claim for injuries including to his spine, skin, and cardiovascular system. The defendant appealed the initial award, arguing for a cardiac MRI, disputing the cause of GERD, and questioning the disability rating for the skin condition. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration to address these issues. Ultimately, the Board affirmed the award, reducing the permanent disability rating slightly to 87% due to a re-evaluation of the skin condition impairment rating.

GERDNSAIDLVHechocardiogramcardiac MRIactinic keratosisprecancerous lesionsdisfigurementAMA Guidespermanent disability rating
References
Case No. ADJ7730915
Regular
Sep 18, 2015

TODD PALOMBO vs. CITY OF COSTA MESA

This case involves a firefighter claiming industrial heart injury under Labor Code § 3212, which presumes such injuries are work-related unless rebutted. The defense argued pre-existing conditions and lifestyle choices caused the applicant's cardiac arrhythmia. However, the medical expert did not definitively state non-work-related factors were the *sole* cause of the heart trouble, failing to overcome the statutory presumption. Therefore, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed the finding of industrial injury.

Labor Code section 3212firefighterheart troublepresumptionindustrial injurycirculatory systemcumulative periodPetition for ReconsiderationWCJagreed medical evaluator
References
Case No. ADJ9506185
Regular
Jul 13, 2016

JIM NEWELL vs. COUNTY OF KERN

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the County of Kern's petition for reconsideration of an award to Jim Newell. The award was based on industrial cumulative trauma to the lumbar spine and hypertensive cardiovascular disease, including left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). The County argued there was insufficient evidence of LVH and sought further medical development, specifically a cardiac MRI. The Board found that the existing medical evidence, including echocardiograms and expert testimony, constituted substantial evidence to support the LVH diagnosis, making further testing unnecessary.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCounty of KernJim NewellSheriff's Sergeantcumulative traumalumbar spinecirculatory systemhypertensionhypertensive cardiovascular diseaseleft ventricular hypertrophy
References
Case No. ADJ7894308; ADJ7661229; ADJ9465603
Regular
Aug 20, 2025

Assadour Assadourian vs. Ari G. Minassian School, State Compensation Insurance Fund, Church Mutual Insurance Company

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board reviewed the Findings of Fact, Award and Order concerning Assadour Assadourian's industrial injury claims against Ari G. Minassian School and its insurers. The Board affirmed that contract non-renewal constituted an actual event of employment for psychiatric injury claims. However, it rejected the "pass-through" apportionment from cardiac conditions to psychiatric and sleep-related disabilities, deeming the medical opinions legally unsustainable. Consequently, the Board amended the permanent disability award to 78 percent, reserving jurisdiction to the WCJ for attorney's fees adjustments.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationFindings of FactAward and OrderIndustrial InjuryCardiovascular SystemPsycheSleep DisorderUrologic SystemSexual Dysfunction
References
Case No. ADJ9179881
Regular
Dec 19, 2014

CURTIS MAUCH vs. CITY OF LODI, YORK RISK SERVICES GROUP, INC.

Here's a summary of the case for a lawyer in four sentences: The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration, upholding the prior decision that required liability for necessary medical treatment. This liability is specifically limited to treatment enabling knee replacement surgery, not for subsequent conditions. The Board adopted the WCJ's reasoning, citing *Braewood Convalescent Hospital v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.* to support the decision. The case involved an applicant needing knee replacement surgery, and the defendant argued that a separate cardiac defibrillator issue was unrelated to the industrial injury.

Petition for ReconsiderationWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardCity of LodiYork Risk Services GroupAdministrative Law JudgeKnee replacement surgeryCardiac defibrillatorBraewood Convalescent HospitalLabor Code Section 5903Myers
References
Showing 1-10 of 55 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational