CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Cooper v. Williamson County Board of Education

This case concerns the dismissal of Freeman M. Cooper, a principal, by the Williamson County Board of Education under the Teacher Tenure Act. The Chancery Court's review of the dismissal was found to be procedurally flawed by the Supreme Court, as it improperly limited the scope of review. The Supreme Court clarified that a de novo hearing, as mandated by the Act, requires a complete redetermination of facts and law without deference to the administrative board's decision. Consequently, the Supreme Court partially vacated the lower court's judgment regarding Cooper's dismissal and remanded the case for a new de novo hearing, while affirming other aspects of the judgment concerning the Open Meetings Act and board bias allegations.

Teacher Tenure ActAdministrative ReviewJudicial ReviewDe Novo HearingSchool Board DismissalProcedural DefectsTennessee LawAppellate ProcedureBurden of ProofOpen Meetings Act
References
21
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Stalter v. Board of Cooperative Educational Services

Plaintiff James D. Stalter, Jr. sued the Board of Cooperative Educational Services of Rockland County (BOCES) under the Americans with Disabilities Act and New York Executive Law, alleging discrimination due to his cerebral palsy and speech impediment. BOCES moved for summary judgment, arguing Stalter was not disabled, did not suffer an adverse employment decision, and his claims were untimely filed with the EEOC. The District Court, presided over by Judge McMahon, denied BOCES's motion, finding genuine issues of material fact on all key arguments. The court determined that Stalter's inability to speak constituted a substantial limitation of a major life activity, and there was sufficient evidence that BOCES regarded him as disabled. Furthermore, the court found factual disputes regarding whether Stalter was denied overtime and a shift change, and if the continuing violation doctrine or equitable tolling applied to his EEOC complaint's timeliness.

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)Disability DiscriminationSummary JudgmentCerebral PalsySpeech ImpairmentEmployment DiscriminationAdverse Employment ActionEEOCStatute of LimitationsContinuing Violation
References
32
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Ficken v. Vocational Education & Extension Board of Suffolk

The petitioner sought review of her employment termination as a secretary by the Vocational Education and Extension Board of the County of Suffolk (VEEB) and requested reinstatement with back pay. She argued that she was discharged without the procedural protections afforded to civil servants under Civil Service Law § 75. VEEB contended that the petitioner was not covered by these protections. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing her reinstatement and back pay. The appellate court affirmed this decision, holding that the petitioner's position, though designated 'unclassified' by Suffolk County, did not fit any category under Civil Service Law § 35, thus classifying it as 'classified' and entitling her to § 75 protections. The court emphasized that the petitioner could not be denied these rights until a proper classification was established.

Civil Service LawEmployment TerminationReinstatementBack PayUnclassified ServiceClassified ServiceCivil Servant RightsDue ProcessArticle 78 ProceedingSuffolk County
References
5
Case No. 03-01-00491-CV
Regular Panel Decision
Apr 11, 2002

West Orange-Cove Consolidated Independent School District Coppell Independent School District La Porte Independent School District And Port Neches-Groves Independent School District v. Felipe Alanis, Texas Commissioner of Education The Texas Education Agency Carol Keeton Rylander, Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts And the Texas State Board of Education Alvarado I.S.D. Anthony I.S.D. Aubrey I.S.D. Bangs I.S.D.

Four Texas school districts, led by West Orange-Cove Consolidated Independent School District, appealed the dismissal of their action seeking a declaratory judgment that the state's school finance system is unconstitutional. The districts contended that the $1.50 tax cap had become a de facto floor, forcing them to tax at the maximum allowable rate to provide education, thereby constituting an unconstitutional state ad valorem tax. The appellate court affirmed the dismissal, ruling that the districts failed to state a viable cause of action because they did not allege they were forced to tax at the cap specifically to provide the constitutionally-mandated 'accredited education.' The court also found the claim unripe, emphasizing that the focus should be on whether the state's requirements forced a lack of meaningful discretion in setting tax rates for an accredited education, not on a desired level of education or the number of districts taxing at the cap.

School Finance ReformConstitutional ChallengeAd Valorem TaxationEducation FundingDeclaratory JudgmentAppellate JurisdictionRipeness DoctrineTexas Constitution Article VII, Section 1Texas Constitution Article VIII, Section 1-eProperty Tax Cap
References
30
Case No. 2023-03-3926
Regular Panel Decision
Jul 25, 2024

Williams, Judy v. Tennessee Farmers Cooperative Risk Management d/b/a Smoky Mountain Farmers Cooperative

This interlocutory appeal addresses a legal question concerning the application of the Social Security offset in Tennessee workers' compensation cases. Judy Williams, an employee, suffered a work-related arm injury while already receiving Social Security retirement benefits. The employer, Tennessee Farmers Cooperative Risk Management, sought to apply a statutory offset which would reduce Williams' weekly workers' compensation rate below the mandated minimum. The trial court determined that despite the offset provision, the employer must still pay the minimum weekly benefit. The Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board affirmed the trial court's decision, modifying only the finding regarding vocational disability stipulation, concluding that permanent disability benefits cannot be reduced below the statutory minimum weekly benefit by the Social Security offset, and remanded the case.

Workers' Compensation LawSocial Security OffsetMinimum Weekly BenefitPermanent Total DisabilityStatutory ConstructionInterlocutory AppealSummary JudgmentAppellate ReviewEmployer ContributionsHumerus Fracture
References
13
Case No. M2005-02719-COA-R3-CV
Regular Panel Decision
Jun 30, 2010

Wilson County Board of Education v. Wilson County Education Association and Steve Johnson

An assistant principal, Steve Johnson, was transferred to a teaching position by the Wilson County Board of Education. He, along with the Wilson County Education Association, grieved the transfer under a locally negotiated agreement. After the grievance was denied through internal steps, they sought to compel arbitration in the Chancery Court for Wilson County. The trial court granted summary judgment to the Board, concluding that assistant principals are statutorily similar to principals, giving the director of schools unrestrained authority to transfer them. On appeal, the Court of Appeals of Tennessee at Nashville affirmed the trial court's judgment, but on different grounds. The appellate court held that despite the agreement mentioning "binding arbitration," it also stated that the arbitrator "may recommend" remedies, creating an inconsistency that prevented a "meeting of the minds" on the final resolution procedure, thus rendering the arbitration agreement unenforceable.

Education Professional Negotiations ActGrievance ProcedureArbitration AgreementMeeting of the MindsContract InterpretationTeacher TransferAssistant PrincipalStatutory AuthoritySchool Board PowersBinding vs. Advisory Arbitration
References
29
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Aug 31, 1981

Greenspan v. Dutchess County Board of Cooperative Educational Services

The case concerns a CPLR article 78 proceeding initiated by a petitioner against the Dutchess County Board of Cooperative Educational Services. The petitioner, whose position as co-ordinator of pupil services was abolished, sought reassignment to existing or newly created positions based on seniority and similarity of duties under Education Law § 2510. Special Term dismissed the petition, ruling the positions were not in the same tenure area nor involved similar duties. On appeal, the court rejected the petitioner's constitutional argument and her reliance on 8 NYCRR 30.8(a)(7) for administrative tenure areas. However, the appellate court determined that triable issues of fact existed regarding the similarity of duties between the petitioner's abolished role and the sought-after positions under both subdivisions of Education Law § 2510. Consequently, the judgment was reversed, the petition reinstated, and the matter was remitted to the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, for a hearing on these factual issues.

CPLR Article 78Reassignment RightsAbolished PositionTenure AreaEducation Law Section 2510Similarity of DutiesAdministrative TenureSupervisory AppointmentsDutchess County BOCESJudicial Review
References
11
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Madison-Oneida Board of Cooperative Educational Services v. Mills

This case is an appeal reversing a Supreme Court judgment that had annulled a determination by the Commissioner of Education. The Commissioner had previously ruled that tenured teaching assistants (TAs) are entitled to lay-off seniority protection under Education Law § 3013 (2), classifying them as "teachers." The Supreme Court sided with the petitioner, asserting that TAs are not teachers and therefore lack such seniority rights. However, the appellate court disagreed, finding the Commissioner's interpretation to be reasonable and consistent with legislative intent and other similar statutes. The court concluded that denying TAs lay-off seniority while granting them recall seniority would create an illogical outcome.

Education LawSeniority RightsTeaching AssistantsLay-off ProtectionTeacher DefinitionCPLR Article 78Commissioner of EducationAppellate DivisionStatutory InterpretationTenure
References
11
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Cayuga-Onondaga Counties Board of Cooperative Educational Services v. Sweeney

The Cayuga-Onondaga Counties Board of Cooperative Educational Services (BOCES) contracted with the Auburn City School District for a lighting project, employing school district staff as temporary laborers without prevailing wages or overtime. The Commissioner of Labor found BOCES violated Labor Law § 220, mandating prevailing wages for public work. BOCES appealed, asserting the Commissioner lacked jurisdiction due to unfulfilled notice of claim and statute of limitations requirements under Education Law § 3813, and claiming an exemption based on civil service classification. The court affirmed, ruling that prevailing wage enforcement serves a public interest, thereby exempting it from Education Law's procedural bars. Furthermore, the court determined the civil service exemption did not apply to ungraded employees.

Public Work ProjectsPrevailing WageLabor Law § 220Education Law § 3813Notice of ClaimStatute of LimitationsCivil Service ClassificationJurisdictionPublic Interest DoctrineOvertime Wages
References
65
Case No. 89 N.Y.2d 395
Regular Panel Decision
Dec 20, 1996

CAYUGA-ONONDAGA BD v. Sweeney

In a case brought by the Commissioner of Labor, the Cayuga-Onondaga Counties Board of Cooperative Educational Services (BOCES) was found to have violated Labor Law § 220 by failing to pay prevailing wages to employees on a lighting improvement project for the Auburn City School District. BOCES appealed, arguing that the Commissioner lacked jurisdiction due to the failure to file a timely notice of claim and adhere to the statute of limitations under Education Law § 3813. The Court of Appeals affirmed the Appellate Division's decision, holding that prevailing wage enforcement proceedings under Labor Law § 220 vindicate a public interest, making the notice of claim and statute of limitations requirements of Education Law § 3813 inapplicable. The Court also rejected BOCES' argument that the employees' civil service classification exempted them from prevailing wage requirements.

Prevailing wagePublic worksLabor LawEducation LawNotice of claimStatute of limitationsPublic interest doctrineCivil serviceMunicipal contractsSchool district liability
References
44
Showing 1-10 of 1,713 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational