CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Helton v. State

Herbert Joe Helton appealed a Tennessee Claims Commission decision that denied him medical benefits for heart disease. Helton, a former state employee, first experienced coronary issues in 1977, necessitating a double coronary bypass, with subsequent medical expenses paid by the State of Tennessee under workers' compensation. In 1988, while employed by the City of Lakeside, he required additional heart surgery. His cardiologist, Dr. Noel Hunt, testified that the 1988 condition was a progression of the original 1977 heart disease, not a new injury. The Claims Commission initially applied the "last injurious exposure" rule, holding the City of Lakeside liable. However, the appellate court reversed, clarifying that where a prior compensable injury contributes to a later disability without new work conditions causing it, the first employer is liable, and for occupational diseases, the date of incapacity determines the applicable law.

Workers' CompensationOccupational DiseaseHeart DiseaseBypass SurgeryLast Injurious Exposure RuleCausationMedical BenefitsClaims CommissionSuccessive InjuryEmployer Liability
References
3
Case No. 13-ev-3288; 13-cv-4244
Regular Panel Decision

Alzheimer's Disease Resource Center, Inc. v. Alzheimer's Disease & Related Disorders Ass'n

This case involves two related lawsuits stemming from the disaffiliation of the Alzheimer’s Disease Resource Center, Inc. (ADRC) from the Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders Association (the Association). In case 13-ev-3288, ADRC alleged unfair competition, false advertising, and other claims. The Court denied dismissal for false advertising under the Lanham Act, New York General Business Law § 349, and unjust enrichment, but granted dismissal for trademark infringement, common law unfair competition, UCC violations, conversion, tortious interference, and fraud. In case 13-cv-4244, ADRC alleged breach of contract and misappropriation of trade secrets related to donor lists. The Court granted the Association's motion to dismiss this complaint in its entirety. Punitive damages were stricken for Lanham Act and unjust enrichment claims.

Unfair CompetitionLanham ActFalse AdvertisingTrademark InfringementNew York General Business Law § 349Unjust EnrichmentMotion to DismissBreach of ContractTrade Secret MisappropriationConversion
References
55
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Jan 11, 2005

Claim of MacDonald v. Penske Logistics

The claimant appealed a Workers' Compensation Board decision from January 11, 2005, which ruled that her husband's death was not causally related to his employment as a truck driver for Penske Logistics. The decedent was found dead in his truck in May 2000 due to severe coronary heart disease. Initially, a Workers' Compensation Law Judge found the death to be work-related, awarding benefits to the claimant. However, the Board reversed this determination, concluding that the carrier had presented sufficient evidence to rebut the presumption that the death arose out of employment. Medical reports and expert testimony indicated the death was natural due to severe coronary heart disease and unrelated to his job. The claimant failed to provide medical proof to contradict these findings or show a work-related activity that caused the condition. The court affirmed the Board's decision, deferring to its resolution of medical evidence.

Causation of DeathPresumption of CompensabilityCoronary Heart DiseaseMedical Expert TestimonySufficiency of EvidenceAppellate ReviewEmployment-related DeathTrucking IndustryRebuttal of PresumptionWorkers' Compensation Law § 21
References
8
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Krick v. City of Lawrenceburg

Larry Krick, a police officer for the City of Lawrenceburg, experienced chest pain and shortness of breath after a stressful incident in 1993 and was subsequently diagnosed with coronary artery disease. Krick sought workers' compensation benefits, claiming the disease arose from his employment. The trial court initially found in his favor, but the Special Workers' Compensation Panel reversed, a decision affirmed by the higher court. The court found that while a statutory presumption of causation for law enforcement officers applied, it was rebutted by competent medical evidence. Expert testimony indicated Krick's heart disease was primarily caused by non-work-related factors like smoking, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia, and the work incident only aggravated symptoms, not the underlying disease. Consequently, the court concluded that Krick failed to establish a causal connection between his employment and his coronary artery disease, thereby reversing the trial court's judgment and dismissing the case.

Coronary Artery DiseasePolice OfficerWorkers' CompensationOccupational DiseaseCausation RebuttalStatutory PresumptionHypertensionHyperlipidemiaSmoking as Risk FactorExpert Medical Testimony
References
8
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Mason v. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n

Charlie Mason, a 53-year-old truck driver, died of a heart attack while working a night shift in freezing weather. His widow filed a worker's compensation claim, asserting the heart attack was an occupational disease or an accidental injury resulting from his strenuous work conditions and long hours. The jury determined Mason had a heart attack but found it did not occur in the course of his employment. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's 'take nothing' judgment, finding no error in the jury instructions regarding the definition of 'occupational disease' or the refusal to include a specific definition of 'accidental injury'.

Worker's CompensationHeart AttackOccupational DiseaseCourse of EmploymentJury InstructionsAccidental InjuryAppellate ReviewCausationTexas LawTruck Driver
References
6
Case No. ADJ7941925 (VNO 0120392) ADJ2139821 (VNO 0472608)
Regular
Mar 25, 2013

KIM A. ALLEN vs. CITY OF PASADENA

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the WCJ's decision, and returned the case to the trial level. The defendant argued that the WCJ erred in finding industrial causation for the applicant's coronary artery disease, citing res judicata and the issue not being properly raised. However, the Board found no substantial medical evidence supported the finding of industrial injury for the current condition, necessitating further proceedings. The applicant had prior stipulated awards for heart conditions, but the coronary artery disease was alleged as a new problem.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCity of PasadenaPermissibly Self-InsuredFindings of FactInjury AOE/COECoronary Artery DiseaseCardiovascular SystemFirefighterCumulative PeriodRes Judicata
References
2
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

the Claim of Brigandi v. Town & Country Linoleum & Carpet

This case involves an appeal by an employer and its compensation carrier against decisions made by the Workers’ Compensation Board. The decedent, a carpet layer, died from cardiac arrest during work, with an autopsy revealing underlying coronary atherosclerotic disease. His widow was awarded death benefits. The employer’s carrier sought reimbursement from the Special Disability Fund under Workers’ Compensation Law § 15 (8), asserting a preexisting permanent physical impairment. However, the Board determined that there was no evidence that the decedent’s heart condition hindered his job potential before his death, thus releasing the Special Disability Fund from liability and holding the compensation carrier responsible. The employer's subsequent application for reconsideration was denied by the Board, leading to these appeals. The appellate court affirmed the Board's decisions, concluding that the Board rationally found no proof that the decedent's heart disease impaired his job potential, a necessary condition for reimbursement under WCL § 15 (8) (d).

Special Disability FundPreexisting Permanent ImpairmentCardiac ArrestCoronary Atherosclerotic DiseaseDeath Benefits ClaimEmployer ReimbursementCarrier LiabilityBoard Decision ReviewAppellate AffirmationMedical Evidence Interpretation
References
2
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Blair v. INA of Texas

Appellant Kenneth Blair sought worker's compensation benefits after suffering a heart attack while employed by E & P Trucking Company. The jury initially found the heart attack did not occur in the course of employment. The appellate court reviewed the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence, specifically the testimony of Dr. D.L. Woodson, Jr., a medical expert. Dr. Woodson testified that Blair's strenuous activity at work likely precipitated the heart attack given his pre-existing severe coronary artery disease. The court concluded that the jury's finding was against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence, therefore reversing the judgment and remanding the case to the trial court.

References
13
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Feb 17, 1984

Claim of Carpino v. Treasure Chest Restaurant

Claimant's husband, a chef, suffered a heart attack at work and a fatal second heart attack five days after release from the hospital. The Workers’ Compensation Board concluded that his work efforts precipitated the heart attack and his subsequent death was causally related to his employment, awarding death benefits. The employer appealed, arguing a preexisting coronary artery disease and insufficient notice, citing the need for more strenuous work than ordinary life. The court affirmed the Board's decision, finding substantial evidence that the decedent's job required long hours, a hot kitchen, and heavy lifting, which was strenuous for him. The court noted that the Board is free to choose among conflicting expert medical opinions regarding causal relationship, and their decision was supported by substantial evidence.

Workers' CompensationHeart AttackCausal RelationshipStrenuous WorkPreexisting ConditionExpert TestimonySubstantial EvidenceDeath BenefitsNoticeAppellate Review
References
2
Case No. ADJ9184413
Regular
Oct 27, 2020

JEFFREY SPRINGER vs. RJ DONOVAN CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

This case involves a workers' compensation claim by Jeffrey Springer against RJ Donovan Correctional Facility. The Applicant sustained injuries resulting in industrially caused hypertension, hypertensive kidney disease, and hypertensive heart disease. The primary dispute centered on how to combine a prior 28% permanent disability rating for kidney disease with a new 49% rating for heart disease. The defendant argued these were part of a single cardiovascular system and sought to subtract the prior award's monetary value from the new rating. The WCJ found the injuries to the kidney and heart were distinct, justifying combining them, and awarded 63% permanent disability after deducting the prior award's value. The Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration, adopting the WCJ's reasoning.

Workers Compensation Appeals BoardRJ Donovan Correctional FacilityLegally UninsuredState Compensation Insurance FundPetition for ReconsiderationPermanent DisabilityHypertensionHypertensive Kidney DiseaseHypertensive Heart DiseaseHypertensive Cardiovascular Disease
References
1
Showing 1-10 of 1,198 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational