CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. SAC 316687
Regular
Feb 28, 2008

STEVE OLSON vs. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

This case involves a correctional lieutenant claiming cumulative industrial injury to his heart, hypertension, diabetes, and GERD. The original decision apportioned 80% of his permanent disability to non-industrial causes, but the Appeals Board rescinded this. The Board determined that Labor Code section 4663(e) exempts safety officers like the applicant from apportionment for presumed injuries, and the calculation of permanent disability indemnity must now follow the *Brodie/Welcher* standard.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardSAC 316687Steve OlsonDepartment of CorrectionsState Compensation Insurance FundOpinion and Decision After Reconsiderationcorrectional lieutenantcumulative industrial injuryhearthypertension
References
Case No. ADJ9172692
Regular
Feb 25, 2016

TIMOTHY FRYE vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, Legally Uninsured; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

This case involves a correctional lieutenant who claimed a cumulative industrial injury to his heart, knees, hip, cardiovascular system, and hypertension. The defendant sought reconsideration, arguing for separate injury periods for orthopedic and internal conditions. The Board denied the petition, upholding the finding of a single cumulative trauma period ending on the applicant's last day of employment. The Board found no evidence that the applicant knew his disability was work-related prior to consulting an attorney, thus establishing the date of injury as post-employment.

Cumulative traumaDate of injuryIndustrial injuryCardiovascular systemHypertensionOrthopedic claimInternal claimPetition for reconsiderationFindings of Fact and AwardsWCJ
References
Case No. ADJ10256108, ADJ10255968, ADJ10256212, ADJ10256223, ADJ10489875
Regular
Sep 23, 2022

JOSEPH RYAN vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Appeals Board affirmed the finding of permanent and total disability for the applicant, Joseph Ryan, stemming from industrial injuries sustained while employed as a correctional captain. However, the Board remanded the matter for further proceedings to specifically address apportionment of the permanent disability under Labor Code section 4663, considering the Agreed Medical Evaluator's opinion on pre-existing spinal disease. The Board found that the applicant's specific and cumulative trauma injuries to his spine resulted in intertwined disabilities, justifying a combined award, but that Dr. Hasday's apportionment findings require further development and determination at the trial level.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardJoseph RyanCalifornia Department of CorrectionsLegally UninsuredState Compensation Insurance FundADJ10256108ADJ10255968ADJ10256212ADJ10256223ADJ10489875
References
Case No. ADJ847031
Regular
Dec 10, 2010

CARLOS REYES vs. EL POLLO LOCO, PACIFIC COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the Petition for Reconsideration in the case of Carlos Reyes v. El Pollo Loco and Pacific Compensation Insurance Company. The Board adopted the WCJ's report as the basis for the denial. Additionally, the Board corrected a clerical error in the caption of the September 20, 2010 Findings and Order to accurately reflect the defendant's name as "Pacific Compensation Insurance Company." Therefore, the reconsideration is denied, and the caption is corrected.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationAdministrative Law JudgeFindings and OrderClerical ErrorEAMSCaption CorrectionDefendant Name CorrectionIN-HOUSE LITIGATION DEPARTMENTUNIVERSAL ASSIGNED NAME
References
Case No. ADJ4653074 (BAK 0152415)
Regular
Oct 11, 2013

ROBERT HUFF vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to review the administrative law judge's decision regarding applicant Robert Huff's workers' compensation claim against the California Department of Corrections. The Board amended the findings to deny temporary total disability benefits for the period December 9, 2009, to March 7, 2011, as the applicant had exhausted his 104-week limit. The Board also deferred the issues of permanent disability and attorney's fees, remanding the matter for a new rating based on the orthopedic Agreed Medical Evaluator's March 5, 2012 report, while affirming the rejection of the psychiatric AME's apportionment. Finally, the Board corrected a clerical error regarding the weekly rate for permanent disability benefits.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDROBERT HUFFCALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONSPermissibly UninsuredSTATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUNDOpinion and Decision After ReconsiderationFindings of Fact Award and OpinionWCJAgreed Medical EvaluatorsAME
References
Case No. ADJ6921831, ADJ9093989
Regular
May 02, 2016

KISCHA LOVING vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION VENTURA YOUTH CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

This order denies Kischa Loving's petition for reconsideration in two workers' compensation cases against the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board adopted the reasoning of the administrative law judge's report. No new evidence or arguments were presented to warrant overturning the original decision. Therefore, the petition for reconsideration was denied.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationWCJ reportCalifornia Department of Corrections and RehabilitationVentura Youth Correctional FacilityState Compensation Insurance Fundadministrative law judgedenial of reconsiderationADJ6921831ADJ9093989
References
Case No. ADJ9217154
Regular
May 25, 2016

Dave Tamplen vs. State of California Department of Corrections

This case involves a State Corrections Officer who claimed psychological and cardiac injury due to cumulative work stress. The defendant employer argued for dismissal due to the applicant's failure to appear at trial, claiming a due process violation and lack of necessary foundational evidence for medical reports. However, the Appeals Board affirmed the original findings, holding that the employer's failure to comply with discovery rules and subpoena the applicant precluded their due process argument. The Board also found substantial medical evidence, including Agreed Medical Evaluator reports and the applicant's deposition, supported the injury findings, the cumulative injury period, and rejected the employer's defense that the injury was substantially caused by a good faith personnel action.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationFindings and OrderCorrections OfficerCorrections CounselorPsycheHeart InjuryCirculatory SystemCumulative InjuryStatute of Limitations
References
Case No. ADJ1774552 (OXN 0142840) ADJ3077412 (OXN 0142839)
Regular
Oct 28, 2008

ROGENE GIANGROSSI vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS - CHINO, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The applicant's petition for removal was denied because the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board found no abuse of discretion by the administrative law judge (WCJ). The WCJ correctly took the case off calendar when the applicant was absent for trial due to relocating out of state, as permitted by board rules. The board also found that the WCJ's order did not prejudice the applicant's right to future discovery or due process.

Petition for RemovalOff CalendarAbuse of DiscretionDue ProcessMandatory Settlement ConferenceDeferred RulingDevelopment of RecordSubstantial PrejudiceIrreparable HarmWorkers' Compensation Appeals Board
References
Case No. ADJ2967056 (LBO 0395577)
Regular
Nov 18, 2011

, Applicant, JAMES WHITCOMB (DECEASED), vs. , STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND,

This case concerns the dependents of a deceased correctional officer who sustained an industrial lung injury leading to his death. The applicant dependents seek reconsideration of an award, arguing penalties for delayed benefit payments were erroneously denied and that benefits should be calculated at the current maximum rate. The defendant employer argues death benefits should not be awarded under workers' compensation due to a potential CalPERS special death benefit, thus impacting attorney fees. The Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the original award, and remanded the case to the trial level for further proceedings on benefit rates, penalties, and attorney fees.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardJames WhitcombState of CaliforniaDepartment of CorrectionsState Compensation Insurance FundADJ2967056Opinion and OrderReconsiderationFindings and AwardIndustrial Injury
References
Case No. ADJ7816135
Regular
May 07, 2012

BRYAN FLICKER vs. COUNTY OF BUTTE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to review the administrative law judge's (WCJ) finding of industrial injury for a correctional lieutenant. The WCJ had applied Labor Code section 3213.3, which presumes lower back impairments in peace officers required to wear duty belts. The Board found insufficient evidence that the applicant was required to wear a duty belt as a condition of employment as a peace officer, which is a prerequisite for the presumption's application. Therefore, the Board rescinded the award and returned the case for a determination of industrial injury without reference to the duty belt presumption, allowing for further record development.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardBryan FlickerCounty of ButteADJ7816135Labor Code section 3213.3correctional lieutenantcumulative injurylow back impairmentpeace officerduty belt presumption
References
Showing 1-10 of 1,305 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational