CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ9426340 ADJ9182419
Regular
May 18, 2016

ANTHONY FISHER vs. PUTNAM LEXUS, PUBLIC SERVICE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, CORVEL CORPORATION

This case concerns applicant Anthony Fisher's claim for stem cell treatment for his knees. The primary treating physician submitted Requests for Authorization (RFAs) which the defendant argued were never received. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) rescinded the prior denial, finding the exclusion of applicant's witness testimony (Sarina Brown) was an error. The matter is returned to the trial level to admit Ms. Brown's declaration and allow both parties to present further evidence regarding RFA transmission and the medical necessity of the treatment.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationFindings and OrderRequest for Authorizationmesenchymal Adipose derived stem cellutilization reviewAgreed Medical Evaluatordeclaration of Sarina Brownhearsaydue process
References
Case No. ADJ9248422, ADJ9247183
Regular
Sep 12, 2019

VERONICA VASQUEZ vs. EAST COAST FOODS, dba ROSCOE'S HOUSE OF CHICKEN AND WAFFLES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

This case concerns the validity of liens filed by medical providers and interpreters. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and rescinded a prior order, finding that the declarations supporting the liens were invalid because the declarant, Ilona Kulikova, lacked personal knowledge. The Board dismissed one lien completely due to the lack of any other valid declaration. However, for two other liens, the Board remanded the case to allow the trial judge to reconsider additional declarations that were not initially evaluated.

Labor Code section 4903.8DeclarationPersonal knowledgeCompetent to testifyElectronic signatureLien claimantsAmended declarationsDue processJoint Findings and OrderPetition for Reconsideration
References
Case No. ADJ8182087
Regular
Jan 18, 2018

Darin Day vs. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, TRISTAR

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed a prior decision allowing a medical lien by VQ Orthocare against the City of Los Angeles. The Board found VQ's lien was valid despite late filing of a required declaration, as the lien was filed before the relevant statute's effective date. Defendant's arguments regarding the timeliness and form of the declaration were rejected, with the Board noting compliance with procedural rules for electronic filing and declarations under penalty of perjury. The lien was thus permitted to proceed on its merits.

Labor Code section 4903.8(d)Declaration requirementLien validityStatute of limitationsReconsiderationFindings and OrderMedical treatment lienSB 863SB 1160Declaration of readiness
References
Case No. ADJ3425275 (VNO0499477)
Regular
Oct 18, 2018

KAREN JACOBSEN vs. KRISTIN MULHALL, AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY, Administered by AIG

This case concerns a medical treatment lien filed before January 1, 2013, by the Long Beach Pain Center. The defendant argued the lien should be dismissed for failure to timely file a sworn declaration under Labor Code section 4903.8(d) and for alleged ownership by a "suspended provider." The Board affirmed the WCJ's decision, finding the declaration defect curable and the defendant failed to prove ownership/control under section 139.21. However, the Board noted the untimeliness of the declaration and directed the WCJ to consider sanctions.

RemittiturPetition for Writ of ReviewPetition for ReconsiderationSupplemental Findings of Fact and OrdersLien ClaimantMedical Treatment LienLabor Code Section 4903.8(d)Sworn DeclarationDismissed by Operation of LawLabor Code Section 139.21
References
Case No. ADJ8324040
Regular
Mar 15, 2019

ISAIAS GARCIA vs. CERADYNE, INC.; XL INSURANCE c/o SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to lien claimants Technical Surgical Support and Comprehensive Outpatient Surgery Center. The WCJ had disallowed their liens because their Labor Code section 4903.8(d) declarations were filed untimely and not considered part of the record. The Board found that while the declarations were indeed filed late, the liens themselves were filed before January 1, 2013, predating a stricter WCAB rule. The Board rescinded the WCJ's order, returning the case for further proceedings to allow the defendant to examine the declarant and for a merits-based consideration of the liens.

Labor Code section 4903.8(d)lien claimantsPetition for ReconsiderationFindings and OrderWCJDeclaration of Readinesslien hearinguntimely declarationWCAB Rule 10770(c)(8)Mendoza v. Oak Grove
References
Case No. ADJ7580462; ADJ7580463; ADJ8813744
Regular
Mar 11, 2025

DORINA CORNEJO vs. SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION, ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY

Lien claimant Supreme Copy Service, Inc., sought reconsideration of a workers' compensation administrative law judge's (WCJ) findings regarding its withdrawn lien and sanctionable conduct. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted the petition for reconsideration, rescinding the previous findings. The Board determined that the lien was dismissed by operation of law on July 3, 2017, due to the lien claimant's failure to file a required declaration under Labor Code section 4903.05. Consequently, the defendant's petition for sanctions was rendered moot, as the WCAB no longer had jurisdiction over the dismissed lien.

Workers Compensation Appeals BoardLien ClaimantPetition for ReconsiderationFindings of FactSanctionable ConductLabor Code Section 4903.05Dismissal by Operation of LawDeclaration Pursuant to Labor Code Section 4903.8Declaration Pursuant to Labor Code Section 4903.05(c)(3)Electronic Adjudication Management System
References
Case No. ADJ10737420, ADJ11230735
Regular
May 28, 2019

METHVEN BROWN (Deceased), JANINE BROWN (Widow) vs. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, Permissibly Self-Insured, SACRAMENTO COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of a decision finding no industrial injury to the decedent's heart or cerebrovascular system. The widow argued the administrative law judge erred by disallowing further discovery from a cardiologist. However, the Board adopted the judge's report, which noted a neurologist already testified that heart trouble and industrial stress were not medically probable causes of the decedent's stroke and death. The applicants failed to demonstrate why a cardiologist would be more competent to offer such opinions.

Methven BrownJanine BrownCounty of SacramentoSacramento County Probation DepartmentADJ10737420ADJ11230735Petition for ReconsiderationJoint Findings and Orderindustrial injuryheart injury
References
Case No. ADJ10110995 (MF)
Regular
Jun 20, 2019

Preston Lee Brown Scott vs. City of Los Angeles

Applicant Preston Lee Brown Scott, previously declared a vexatious litigant, filed multiple documents seeking relief without obtaining the required pre-filing approval. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board reviewed these filings and found no significant change in circumstances justifying reconsideration of prior rulings. Consequently, the Board issued an order stating that the submitted documents are not accepted for filing. This order reaffirms the pre-filing requirements for vexatious litigants absent representation by a licensed attorney.

Vexatious LitigantPre-Filing OrderAppeals Board Rule 10782In Pro PerApplication for AdjudicationDeclaration of ReadinessPleadingsPetitionLicensed AttorneyChange in Circumstances
References
Case No. ADJ10110995
Regular
Oct 14, 2020

PRESTON LEE BROWN SCOTT vs. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, THE HARTFORD

The applicant, Preston Lee Brown Scott, was declared a vexatious litigant in 2018 and is subject to a pre-filing order. This order requires him to obtain prior approval from a judge before filing any documents with the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB). He has filed multiple petitions for reconsideration without this approval. The WCAB has reviewed these filings and found no significant change in circumstances to warrant acceptance. Therefore, the documents submitted by Mr. Scott are not accepted for filing.

Vexatious litigantPre-filing orderWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardRule 10430Rule 10782In pro perPetition for ReconsiderationAdjudication of claimDeclaration of readinessPleading
References
Case No. ADJ8396919
Regular
Jan 26, 2016

LEONEL ENCISO SANTOS vs. RCR PLUMBING MECHANICAL, ARCH INSURANCE SERVICES, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, INC.

This case involves petitions to dismiss liens based on untimely declarations required by Labor Code section 4903.8(d). The Appeals Board affirmed the trial judge's denial of dismissal, finding the statute does not mandate dismissal for pre-2013 liens filed untimely. However, the Board amended the findings to formally admit Foundation's corrected declaration and remanded for the WCJ to consider sanctions against the lien claimants for their delays.

Labor Code section 4903.8(d)Lien claimsPetition to dismissTimeliness of declarationReconsiderationFindings and OrderAmended declarationNatural personCompetent witnessPersonal knowledge
References
Showing 1-10 of 1,251 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational