CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ8026817
Regular
Apr 22, 2013

MARIA OCHOA vs. RANGERS DIE CASTING COMPANY, COMPWEST INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration of a decision finding the applicant sustained injury to her respiratory system and psyche AOE/COE. The WCAB rescinded the decision and returned the case to the trial level, finding the medical opinions of Dr. Lipper and Dr. Curtis lacked substantiality. Specifically, the physicians failed to provide clear diagnoses, quantify exposures, or adequately explain causation. The Board noted contradictory testimony from the applicant's supervisor and insufficient evidence to support the initial findings.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardMaria OchoaRangers Die Casting CompanyCOMPWEST INSURANCE COMPANYADJ8026817Los Angeles District OfficeOpinion and Order Granting ReconsiderationDecision After ReconsiderationFindings of FactWorkers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge (WCJ)
References
Case No. ADJ7673518, ADJ7647749
Regular
Jan 23, 2015

ANA DE AYALA vs. AO-THE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION / CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and reversed a prior ruling, finding the applicant sustained industrial injury to her neck. While the applicant testified to injuring her neck in a workplace incident and this was partially corroborated, the Board found insufficient evidence for other claimed injuries. The Board specifically disagreed with the administrative law judge's credibility assessment concerning the neck injury itself, relying on medical reports and testimony supporting the neck injury claim. The Board affirmed the denial of claims for all other alleged injuries, finding insufficient medical evidence to link them to the incident.

Petition for ReconsiderationFindings and OrderIndustrial InjuryNeck InjuryBack InjurySpine InjuryUpper ExtremitiesPsycheGastroesophageal SystemInternal System
References
Case No. ADJ3133261 (VNO 0400017)
Regular
Aug 17, 2010

FELIPE TOLENTINO vs. CONCO CEMENT, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, XCHANGING INC., FREMONT COMPENSATION

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the lien claimant's petition for reconsideration as premature. The WCAB granted the defendant's petition for reconsideration regarding the temporary disability overpayment issue, deferring it for further proceedings. The Board affirmed the WCJ's findings on injury causation and permanent disability but amended the decision to clarify the overpayment issue. Finally, the WCAB issued a notice of intention to sanction defendant's counsel for attaching and citing unadmitted evidence.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardFELIPE TOLENTINOCONCO CEMENTCALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATIONXCHANGING INC.FREMONT COMPENSATIONliquidationADJ3133261VNO 0400017OPINION AND ORDERS DISMISSING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND GRANTING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION
References
Case No. ADJ7073544
Regular
Sep 06, 2016

OMAR NUNEZ vs. PETROCHEM INSULATION, INC., AIG CLAIMS

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration and rescinded the prior dismissal of Omar Nunez's case. The WCAB found that the dismissal for failure to appear at trial violated Nunez's due process rights because no specific Notice of Intention to Dismiss (NIT) was issued for his non-appearance. The prior NIT addressed failure to prosecute, not failure to appear, thus depriving Nunez of an opportunity to object. The case was returned to the trial level for further proceedings.

Petition for ReconsiderationNotice of Intention to DismissFailure to AppearDue ProcessWCAB RulesDismissal Without PrejudiceFailure to ProsecuteViolation of RulesRescind OrderReturn to Trial Level
References
Case No. ADJ10982659
Regular
Oct 29, 2013

JESSICA WATKINS vs. COUNTY OF ALEMEDA, YORK RISK SERVICES GROUP

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted the applicant's petition for reconsideration and rescinded the dismissal of her case. The dismissal occurred because the applicant failed to appear at trial, but the WCAB found the administrative law judge (WCJ) improperly dismissed the case without issuing the required ten-day notice of intention to dismiss. This failure to provide notice violated the applicant's due process rights. While acknowledging the applicant's out-of-state residency and ongoing medical treatment negotiations, the WCAB cautioned that a lack of legal representation does not excuse failure to attend properly noticed proceedings.

WCABPetition for ReconsiderationOrder of DismissalFailure to AppearTrialOut of State ApplicantDue ProcessFair HearingWCAB Rule 10562Notice of Intention to Dismiss
References
Case No. ADJ880264 (AHM 0133336)
Regular
Apr 19, 2017

DANIEL MEDINA vs. CONTROL AIR CONDITIONING, ZURICH NORTH AMERICA

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration and rescinded the dismissal of his case. The dismissal was deemed a violation of due process because the applicant did not receive adequate notice that his case would be dismissed based on his personal appearance at the June 26, 2017 trial or his alleged lack of participation. The WCAB found that the original Notice of Intention to Dismiss was solely based on failure to appear at the May 15, 2017 trial, and the applicant's request for an opportunity to be heard on these issues was improperly denied. Consequently, the matter was returned to the trial level for further proceedings, ensuring the applicant's right to a fair hearing.

Petition for ReconsiderationDismissal of CaseNotice of Intention to DismissDue ProcessFailure to AppearAttorney Calendaring ErrorReport and RecommendationWorkers' Compensation JudgeWCABFindings of Fact
References
Case No. ADJ782721 (SBR 0340531)
Regular
Feb 14, 2011

ROSALIND GRANT vs. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration of an order dismissing Rosalind Grant's claim due to her failure to appear at trial. The WCAB found the dismissal improper because Grant's attorney was present at trial, and the rules permit dismissal only if a party and their representative fail to appear. Furthermore, the applicant has no obligation to testify, and defendants must formally subpoena an absent applicant or provide a notice to appear to their attorney. The case was returned to the trial level for further proceedings, including potential action on a previously negotiated compromise and release.

ReconsiderationDismissal OrderFailure to AppearCompromise and ReleaseAttorney RepresentationMandatory Settlement ConferenceNotice of Intention to DismissRescinded OrderReturn to Trial LevelHearsay Evidence
References
Case No. ADJ6733950
Regular
Jul 25, 2012

ANTHONY AVILA vs. MARK EVERETTE DRYWALL CO., EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE CO., AMERICAN CLAIMS MANAGEMENT

This case concerns an applicant's Petition for Reconsideration of a dismissal order. The applicant argues his due process rights were violated because the dismissal for failure to appear was improper since his counsel was present at trial dates. The Appeals Board found that as the applicant was represented by counsel at trial, dismissal was erroneous. The Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the dismissal, and returned the matter to the trial level, also noting the unresolved request for counsel to withdraw.

Petition for ReconsiderationOrder Dismissing CaseWCJdue processMandatory Settlement ConferencetrialMinutes of Hearingrelieved as counselNotice of Intention to Dismiss Casefailure to appear
References
Case No. ADJ10243783
Regular
Jan 27, 2017

PEDRO GALARZA SALAZAR vs. HOMEY PET STATION, MID-CENTURY INSURANCE CO., FARMERS INSURANCE CO.

The applicant sought reconsideration of a case dismissed for the applicant's attorney's failure to appear at a priority conference and respond to a Notice of Intent to Dismiss. Although the attorney did not appear at the scheduled time, he did appear later that morning and addressed the WCJ. The Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the dismissal, and returned the case for further proceedings. The Board found that the WCJ should have treated the applicant's subsequent appearance as an objection and scheduled a hearing, rather than dismissing the case.

WCABPetition for ReconsiderationOrder Dismissing CasePriority ConferenceNotice of Intent to DismissFailure to AppearWCJApplicant's AttorneyMinutes of HearingObjection
References
Case No. ADJ9431614
Regular
Jan 31, 2019

RAYMUNDO ESTRADA vs. GREEN GARDEN SERVICE

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration and rescinded the WCJ's dismissal order due to improper notice. The dismissal was based on the applicant's failure to appear at conferences and suspected death, but the Notice of Intent to Dismiss did not adequately reflect these grounds. The Board found good cause to grant the applicant's attorney's petition to withdraw. The case is returned to the WCJ for further proceedings and issuance of a new Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

Petition for ReconsiderationNotice of Intent to DismissMandatory Settlement ConferenceStatus ConferencePetition to be Relieved as Attorney of RecordDeceased ApplicantOrder Dismissing CaseWithdrawal PetitionReinstatementFailure to Appear
References
Showing 1-10 of 13,123 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational