CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ7673518, ADJ7647749
Regular
Jan 23, 2015

ANA DE AYALA vs. AO-THE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION / CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and reversed a prior ruling, finding the applicant sustained industrial injury to her neck. While the applicant testified to injuring her neck in a workplace incident and this was partially corroborated, the Board found insufficient evidence for other claimed injuries. The Board specifically disagreed with the administrative law judge's credibility assessment concerning the neck injury itself, relying on medical reports and testimony supporting the neck injury claim. The Board affirmed the denial of claims for all other alleged injuries, finding insufficient medical evidence to link them to the incident.

Petition for ReconsiderationFindings and OrderIndustrial InjuryNeck InjuryBack InjurySpine InjuryUpper ExtremitiesPsycheGastroesophageal SystemInternal System
References
Case No. ADJ8026817
Regular
Apr 22, 2013

MARIA OCHOA vs. RANGERS DIE CASTING COMPANY, COMPWEST INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration of a decision finding the applicant sustained injury to her respiratory system and psyche AOE/COE. The WCAB rescinded the decision and returned the case to the trial level, finding the medical opinions of Dr. Lipper and Dr. Curtis lacked substantiality. Specifically, the physicians failed to provide clear diagnoses, quantify exposures, or adequately explain causation. The Board noted contradictory testimony from the applicant's supervisor and insufficient evidence to support the initial findings.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardMaria OchoaRangers Die Casting CompanyCOMPWEST INSURANCE COMPANYADJ8026817Los Angeles District OfficeOpinion and Order Granting ReconsiderationDecision After ReconsiderationFindings of FactWorkers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge (WCJ)
References
Case No. RIV 054592
Regular
Nov 16, 2007

LOURDES CERVANTES vs. CARL'S JR. ENTERPRISES, ST. PAUL'S TRAVELERS INSURANCE

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a prior award, amending it to defer the issue of applicant's attorney's fees from EDD's lien recovery. This was due to the WCJ failing to issue a Notice of Intention to award such fees, violating EDD's due process rights. The Board also deferred the issue of whether EDD is entitled to interest on its lien.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardLien claimantReconsiderationFindings Award and OrderTemporary disability indemnityAttorney's feesLabor Code section 4903.2Notice of Intention (NIT)Unemployment Insurance Code section 2629.1(e)Industrial injury
References
Case No. ADJ16334598
Regular
Oct 13, 2025

ANTHONY REYES vs. XPO LOGISTICS SUPPLY CHAIN, INC.; EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE

Applicant Anthony Reyes filed a petition for removal challenging an order by the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) that took the matter off calendar. The WCAB granted removal, determining that the WCJ's order violated the parties' right to due process by failing to create a record or explain the deferral of the additional panels issue, thus constituting irreparable harm. As a Decision After Removal, the Appeals Board rescinded the April 24, 2025, order taking the matter off calendar and returned the case to the trial level to establish a proper record. The Board explicitly stated it made no judgment on the merits of additional panels at this stage due to the lack of a formal record.

Petition for RemovalOrder Taking Matter Off CalendarAdditional PanelsDue Process ViolationIrreparable HarmSubstantial PrejudiceRecord CreationTrial LevelWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardRescind Order
References
Case No. ADJ11008178
Regular
Oct 09, 2020

JAMIE BODINE vs. EMPLOYER SOLUTIONS STAFFING GROUP II, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, INC.

This case involves a defendant's petition for reconsideration of a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) decision awarding continuing temporary disability benefits to the applicant. The defendant argued that proceeding to trial on the issue of temporary disability violated its due process rights due to insufficient notice. The WCAB granted reconsideration, rescinded the original award, and returned the matter to the trial level for further proceedings. The Board found that the defendant was not provided with proper notice regarding the temporary disability issue, thus violating its due process rights.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationFindings and AwardTemporary DisabilityDue ProcessExpedited HearingDeclaration of Readiness to ProceedMedical TreatmentWork RestrictionsAccommodation
References
Case No. ADJ8039195
Regular
Jan 15, 2015

TOMAS JAIME vs. BM LANDSCAPE, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Lien claimants' petitions for reconsideration are granted, rescinding the WCJ's prior orders disallowing liens and imposing sanctions. The WCJ improperly disallowed the liens and imposed sanctions without proper notice and opportunity to be heard, violating due process and procedural rules. Lien claimants' failure to appear does not excuse the WCJ from following established procedures for dismissing liens or imposing sanctions. The case is returned to the trial level for further proceedings.

Lien claimantsreconsiderationdisallowancesanctionsbad faithdilatorynoticeopportunity to be hearddue processadministrative law judge
References
Case No. ADJ383777
Regular
Apr 04, 2011

Roxanna Ortiz vs. ONE SOURCE, ESIS

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Roxanna Ortiz's petition for reconsideration of a prior findings and order. The initial ruling determined she sustained industrial injury only to her cervical spine as a janitor, not to other body parts or any resulting temporary/permanent disability or need for further medical treatment. Ortiz argued the judge erred by favoring defense medical reports and discrediting her testimony due to minor inconsistencies in her injury description. The Board adopted the WCJ's report, emphasizing deference to credibility determinations and that admissibility of medical reports should have been challenged at trial, not on reconsideration. A dissenting opinion argued the judge overemphasized minor variations in Ortiz's account and that medical evidence did not sufficiently support denial of other injuries or further treatment.

OrtizOne SourceESISWCABFindings and OrderPetition for ReconsiderationWorkers' Compensation Administrative Law Judgeindustrial injurycervical spineright arm
References
Case No. ADJ8613826
Regular
May 02, 2016

WALTER D. VILLATORO vs. POTENTIAL INDUSTRIES, ZURICH

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) rescinded an order dismissing lien claimant Innovative Orthopedic Services' lien. The lien claimant argued it was denied due process because it never received notice of a lien conference or a Notice of Intention to Dismiss (NIT). The WCAB found that the lien claimant's due process rights were violated due to a lack of record of proper service of the NIT and any further lien conference notice. Therefore, the case is returned to the trial level for further proceedings and a new decision.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardLien claimantPetition for ReconsiderationNotice of Intention to DismissCompromise and ReleaseDue processNotice of Lien ConferenceAdministrative law judgeRescindVoid ab initio
References
Case No. ADJ3213893 (AHM 0133460)
Regular
Sep 30, 2013

JOHN WIRTZ vs. MCKINLEY CHILDREN'S CENTER, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

This case involves an appeal by the State Compensation Insurance Fund (SCIF) challenging a WCJ's order to pay $424.40 for a deposition. SCIF argued their due process rights were violated as their objection to the costs was seemingly not considered before the order was issued. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the WCJ's order, and returned the matter for further proceedings. This decision was based on the finding that SCIF was denied its due process right to be heard regarding the costs.

Labor Code Section 5811Petition for ReconsiderationWCJ OrderDue Process DenialDeposition CostsDholakia & AssociatesIke Kerhulas Ph.D.Interim OrderFinal OrderRight to be Heard
References
Case No. ADJ6588168
Regular
Aug 23, 2010

CHUCK ALLESSI vs. CITY OF RIVERSIDE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the lien claimant's Petition for Reconsideration, rescinding an earlier order that dismissed their lien. The claimant argued that defense counsel misled them about a hearing, violating their due process rights. The WCJ itself requested the dismissal order be rescinded and the matter reassigned to a different judge. Consequently, the case is returned to the trial level for further proceedings regarding the lien claim.

Lien ClaimantPetition for ReconsiderationOrder Dismissing LienWCJDue ProcessBreach of Due ProcessRescindedHearing MisrepresentationReset HearingWorkers' Compensation Appeals Board
References
Showing 1-10 of 7,064 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational