Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ7197213

Regular

Oct 03, 2011

Robert Goslin vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS/REHABILITATION; Legally Uninsured, adjusted by STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/ STATE CONTRACT SERVICES

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and reversed a prior award, finding that the applicant, a correctional officer, was not entitled to the industrial cancer presumption under Labor Code section 3212.1. The Board determined that correctional officers are not among the specifically enumerated "peace officers" eligible for this presumption. Furthermore, the applicant failed to meet the burden of proving his cancer was industrially caused, as the medical expert found insufficient occupational exposure to link it to his employment. Consequently, the applicant's claim for injury arising out of and in the course of employment was denied.

Labor Code section 3212.1Penal Code section 830.2(d)(1)correctional officerpeace officerindustrial cancer presumptionAOE/COEPanel Qualified Medical Evaluator (PQME)nexusdisputable presumptionexpressio unius exclusio alterius

References

Case No. ADJ9097334

Regular

Apr 25, 2016

CHARLES GELETKO vs. CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, SUBSEQUENT INJURIES BENEFITS TRUST FUND

The Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust Fund (SIBTF) sought reconsideration of an award granting applicant benefits, arguing the administrative law judge (WCJ) improperly calculated the applicant's permanent disability. The SIBTF contended the WCJ erred by applying a 1.4 adjustment factor and by adding individual impairments rather than combining them. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, agreeing with the WCJ's report to affirm the award while correcting a mathematical error, ultimately awarding applicant 82% permanent disability. The Board found the 1.4 modifier applicable under the relevant statute, but upheld the prohibition against using the Combined Values Chart when assessing SIBTF eligibility due to statutory exclusions for age and occupation adjustments.

Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust FundLabor Code section 4751permanent disability thresholdwhole-person impairmentsection 4660.11.4 modifierCombined Values ChartCalifornia Highway Patrolcumulative trauma injurycardiovascular system

References

Showing 1-2 of 2 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

Robert Goslin vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS/REHABILITATION; Legally Uninsured, adjusted by STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND/ STATE CONTRACT SERVICES

CHARLES GELETKO vs. CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, SUBSEQUENT INJURIES BENEFITS TRUST FUND