CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. GOL 96757
Regular
Jun 10, 2008

SA YANG LO vs. CUSTOM SENSORS & TECHNOLOGIES, INC., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of a prior award, upholding the application of the 2005 Permanent Disability Rating Schedule. The Board found that exceptions allowing for the 1997 Schedule did not apply, as the applicant's temporary disability indemnity extended beyond January 1, 2005, and no qualifying pre-2005 reports indicated permanent disability. Furthermore, the Board found the applicant's vocational expert's opinion regarding diminished future earning capacity unpersuasive, thus affirming the initial 9% permanent disability rating.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardSA Yang LoCustom Sensors & TechnologiesInc.State Compensation Insurance FundGOL 96757Opinion and Order Denying ReconsiderationFindings and AwardWorkers' Compensation Administrative Law JudgeWCJ
References
Case No. ADJ8558358
Regular
Sep 22, 2025

JOSE MEJIA vs. JB CRITCHLEY, INC., AMERICAN CLAIMS MANAGEMENT

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to clarify that the defendant's prior appeals regarding the applicant's stipulated average weekly wage and permanent disability rate were exhausted and that the award was final as of October 2, 2024. The Board affirmed the imposition of penalties under Labor Code section 5814 and attorney fees under section 5814.5 due to the defendant's unreasonable delay in paying the final award. The defendant's arguments regarding seasonal employment and extrinsic mistake were rejected as the stipulated wages and findings were final and not adequately supported for setting aside. The original Findings and Award were rescinded and substituted to reflect the finality of the prior decision and the confirmed penalties and fees.

Labor Code section 5904Petition for ReconsiderationFindings and Awardsemi-truck drivercervical spinethoracic spinelumbar spinehearing losspsychehypertension
References
Case No. ADJ2965812 (SAC 0308365)
Regular
Apr 23, 2012

CHRISTINE KRAUSE vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SECRETARY FOR RESOURCES AGENCY, Legally Uninsured, Adjusted By STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) rescinded an order compelling the defendant to provide cervical spine surgery, deferring the issue pending a final report from a Spinal Surgery Second Opinion Physician (SSSOP). The SSSOP's report was delayed beyond the statutory 45-day timeframe, but the WCAB found neither party was at fault for this delay, and obtaining the SSSOP's opinion was crucial for a proper decision. The WCAB dismissed the defendant's petition for removal. A dissenting commissioner argued the defendant should be liable for the surgery due to the delayed process, citing precedent that placed the burden on the employer to ensure timely adherence to statutory procedures.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationSpinal Surgery Second Opinion PhysicianUtilization ReviewLabor Code Section 4062(b)Industrial InjuryCervical Spine SurgeryTreating PhysicianIndustrial InjuryDeclaration of Readiness to Proceed
References
Case No. ADJ9546300 ADJ9103215
Regular
Apr 21, 2015

JAMES TUBBS vs. FRESNO CHAFFEE ZOO, NATIONWIDE AGRIBUSINESS INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration and reversed a prior decision, finding the applicant is not entitled to a second lumbar surgery. The WCAB concluded that the applicant failed to meet the burden of proof by providing substantial medical evidence demonstrating the surgery's reasonableness and necessity, as required by Labor Code sections 5705 and 4600. While acknowledging the prior successful surgery, the WCAB found Dr. Aryan's request lacked sufficient support based on established medical treatment guidelines. The dissenting opinion argued that substantial medical evidence supported the surgery and that the defendant's delays unfairly prejudiced the applicant.

ADJ9546300ADJ9103215lumbar spine injuryDr. Francisco UnguezDr. Henry AryanRequest for Authorization (RFA)surgery authorizationL4-S1 surgeryDubon IIsubstantial medical evidence
References
Case No. ADJ1785503
Regular
Nov 19, 2012

EDWARD FELIX vs. WARNER BROS. STUDIO FACILITIES, INC.

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration. The defendant sought to challenge findings of a work-related lumbar spine injury with 21% permanent disability, and the applicant's entitlement to medical treatment and temporary disability. The Board found the defendant failed to follow the proper procedure for obtaining a spinal surgery second opinion under Labor Code section 4062(b), thus denying their argument to limit medical treatment liability. Consequently, the original Findings and Award were affirmed.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationIndustrial InjuryLumbar SpinePermanent DisabilityApportionmentLabor Code Section 4062(b)Medical TreatmentTemporary Disability IndemnitySelf-Procured Surgery
References
Case No. ADJ10256108, ADJ10255968, ADJ10256212, ADJ10256223, ADJ10489875
Regular
Sep 23, 2022

JOSEPH RYAN vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Appeals Board affirmed the finding of permanent and total disability for the applicant, Joseph Ryan, stemming from industrial injuries sustained while employed as a correctional captain. However, the Board remanded the matter for further proceedings to specifically address apportionment of the permanent disability under Labor Code section 4663, considering the Agreed Medical Evaluator's opinion on pre-existing spinal disease. The Board found that the applicant's specific and cumulative trauma injuries to his spine resulted in intertwined disabilities, justifying a combined award, but that Dr. Hasday's apportionment findings require further development and determination at the trial level.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardJoseph RyanCalifornia Department of CorrectionsLegally UninsuredState Compensation Insurance FundADJ10256108ADJ10255968ADJ10256212ADJ10256223ADJ10489875
References
Case No. ADJ383777
Regular
Apr 04, 2011

Roxanna Ortiz vs. ONE SOURCE, ESIS

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Roxanna Ortiz's petition for reconsideration of a prior findings and order. The initial ruling determined she sustained industrial injury only to her cervical spine as a janitor, not to other body parts or any resulting temporary/permanent disability or need for further medical treatment. Ortiz argued the judge erred by favoring defense medical reports and discrediting her testimony due to minor inconsistencies in her injury description. The Board adopted the WCJ's report, emphasizing deference to credibility determinations and that admissibility of medical reports should have been challenged at trial, not on reconsideration. A dissenting opinion argued the judge overemphasized minor variations in Ortiz's account and that medical evidence did not sufficiently support denial of other injuries or further treatment.

OrtizOne SourceESISWCABFindings and OrderPetition for ReconsiderationWorkers' Compensation Administrative Law Judgeindustrial injurycervical spineright arm
References
Case No. ADJ10679103
Regular
Dec 14, 2017

LARRY SYKES vs. THE ANSCHUTZ CORPORATION, STARR INDEMNITY & LIABILITY COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a prior finding of industrial injury to the applicant's lumbar spine. The Board found that the existing medical reporting from Dr. Hong, Dr. Jamasbi, and the PQME Dr. Schofferman did not constitute substantial evidence to support this lumbar spine injury finding. Therefore, the case is returned to the trial level to develop the record further on the lumbar spine injury issue.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationIndustrial InjuryCervical SpineThoracic SpineLumbar SpineStagehandSecurity OfficerMedical Treatment RecordsSubstantial Evidence
References
Case No. ADJ3699477 (OAK 0345390)
Regular
Jul 05, 2011

GARY TOMEI vs. BAY ALARM COMPANY, TRAVELERS PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

This case involves an applicant seeking authorization for cervical surgery, which was denied based on the treating physician's request not being properly formatted per AD Rule 9792.6(o). The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, finding the initial denial was due to the applicant's attorney adding a notation to the physician's report instead of the physician clearly marking it as a spinal surgery authorization request. The Board rescinded the original award, deferring the cervical surgery issue and ordering an expedited second opinion from a designated orthopedic surgeon or neurosurgeon.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardGary TomeiBay Alarm CompanyTravelers Property and Casualty Insurance CompanyADJ3699477Opinion and Order Granting Reconsiderationcervical surgerylumbar spineAdministrative Director Rule 9792.6(o)treating physician
References
Case No. ADJ790852
Regular
Apr 05, 2016

LAURA BREITIGAN vs. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the applicant's petition for reconsideration, amending the award to include attorney fees on accrued unpaid permanent disability benefits and correcting clerical errors. The Board denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration, upholding the finding of 100% permanent disability and injury to the lumbar spine. The defendant was also admonished for filing a document exceeding the page limit without prior permission. The applicant, a nurse, sustained industrial injuries to her thoracic spine, lumbar spine, and psyche.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardLaura BreitiganCounty of RiversideFindings and Awardindustrial injurythoracic spinelumbar spinepsychepermanent disabilityapportionment
References
Showing 1-10 of 4,854 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational