CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Millson v. Manfredo

This paternity proceeding challenges the constitutionality of Family Court Act § 517(a), which sets a five-year Statute of Limitations for mothers to commence such proceedings, arguing it violates equal protection. The respondent moved to dismiss because the petition was filed over five years after the child's birth. The court examined whether the statute impermissibly differentiates between male and female petitioners and between legitimate and illegitimate children. It concluded that the differing limitation periods for mothers and fathers are unjustified, as their rights are now identical. Furthermore, the court found that the five-year statute is not substantially related to preventing stale or fraudulent claims, especially when considering the longer periods for public welfare officials and advancements in blood testing. Consequently, the court determined the petitioner's claim, filed approximately 6.5 years post-birth, to be timely, and denied the respondent's motion to dismiss.

Paternity ProceedingsStatute of LimitationsEqual Protection ClauseConstitutional LawFamily LawGender DiscriminationIllegitimate Children RightsChild SupportJudicial ReviewFamily Court Act
References
12
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

MacTaggart v. Gibbs & Cox. Inc.

This appeal concerns the dismissal of an action for failure to prosecute for over five years. The plaintiffs' primary excuse for the delay was their involvement in another litigation concerning similar issues. However, the court found that the issues in the two cases were not identical, and a significant period of a year and a half elapsed after the conclusion of the prior litigation without any further action on the present case. The court also considered the prejudice to the defendant, noting the difficulty and impracticability of recouping extra costs from clients related to contracts completed between February 1944 and December 1945. Consequently, the court affirmed the dismissal of the action.

failure to prosecutedismissal of actionappellate reviewdiscretionary powerprejudice to defendantdelay in litigationstipulationsamended complaintnote of issueextra compensation
References
1
Case No. ADJ3138312 (WCK 0059967)
Regular
Jul 05, 2011

GREGORY McBEE vs. AMERICAN DESIGN ROOFING, CIGA, LEGION INSURANCE COMPANY

The Appeals Board rescinded a prior award of temporary disability benefits because the applicant's period of temporary disability commenced more than five years after his date of injury. The Board found that Labor Code section 5410, which allows for claims of new and further disability within five years of injury, did not apply here. Jurisdiction to award temporary disability beyond five years is limited to continuous disability that began within that timeframe, which was not established. The case was returned for further proceedings on the issue of permanent disability.

Petition to reopennew and further disabilitytemporary disability indemnityjurisdictionfive-year limitationdate of injurystipulated awardAgreed Medical Evaluatorwrit deniedsubstantial medical evidence
References
4
Case No. ADJ4398201 (SAC 0290129)
Regular
Oct 29, 2008

OCTAVIO BAEZ vs. BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES

This case concerns an employer's appeal of a temporary total disability award beyond the five-year statute of limitations for an industrial injury. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the prior award, and returned the case for further proceedings, finding that case law requires temporary disability to straddle the five-year anniversary of the injury. Specifically, a medical opinion is needed to determine if the applicant was temporarily disabled due to the industrial injury in January and February 2004, just before the five-year mark.

Temporary total disabilityStatute of LimitationsFive-year anniversaryNew and further disabilityTollingReconsiderationLabor Code section 5410Labor Code section 5803Labor Code section 5804Nickelsberg
References
6
Case No. ADJ9758295
Regular
Dec 10, 2018

JOHN BAILEY vs. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 3

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration of a finding that the applicant's claim was not barred by the statute of limitations. The Board affirmed that the employer's voluntary provision of medical treatment and indemnity benefits tolled the one-year statute of limitations under Labor Code § 5405 to the five-year period under § 5410. The defendant's notice disputing permanent disability benefits did not clearly deny all liability for the claim, thus failing to restart the one-year limitations period. The issue of new and further disability was premature and not addressed by the Board in this decision.

Statute of LimitationsPetition for ReconsiderationFindings and OrderLabor Code § 5405Labor Code § 5410TollingNew and Further DisabilityWaiverEstoppelIndustrial Disability Leave (IDL)
References
13
Case No. ADJ10177344
Regular
May 16, 2016

DARRELL WOODS vs. NORTH COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT

Applicant Darrell Woods sought reconsideration of a WCJ's decision denying additional temporary disability indemnity beyond five years from his January 4, 2011 industrial injury. The WCJ correctly found that Labor Code section 4656(c)(2) limits temporary disability payments to 104 weeks within a five-year period from the date of injury. Unlike precedent cited by the applicant, no stipulation was made within the five-year window to continue discovery on temporary disability entitlement. Therefore, the Appeals Board denied the petition for reconsideration, affirming the WCJ's decision.

Labor Code section 4656(c)(2)temporary disability indemnitydate of injuryfive year limitationpetition for reconsiderationindustrial injuryheart injuryhypertensionparamedic/engineersalary continuation
References
4
Case No. ADJ4637128 (GOL 0093729)
Regular
Jun 03, 2016

Vincent Ward vs. Morley Construction, National Union Fire Insurance Company

In this workers' compensation case, the defendant sought reconsideration of a prior award granting temporary disability indemnity. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the award, and ruled that the applicant was barred from claiming new and further temporary disability. This decision was based on Labor Code section 5410, which limits claims for "new and further" disability to five years from the date of injury. The Board clarified that a new award of temporary disability, especially after a prior award was terminated, constitutes a "further" award subject to this five-year limitation.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardMorley ConstructionNational Union Fire Insurance CompanyTemporary Disability IndemnityLabor Code section 5410New and Further DisabilityReconsiderationFindings of Fact and AwardDate of InjuryStipulated Award
References
8
Case No. SBA 0083894; SBA 0099253
Regular
Jul 29, 2008

RAFAEL LOPEZ vs. SAN YSIDRO RANCH, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION For HIH AMERICA, In Liquidation

This case concerns an applicant's petition to amend a prior workers' compensation award to include the right shoulder as an injured body part. The Appeals Board denied reconsideration, holding that the omission of the right shoulder was not a clerical error and that Labor Code section 5804, which limits amendments to awards after five years from the date of injury, barred the requested modification. Since the applicant sought to add a new injury rather than enforce an existing award and the five-year jurisdictional limit had passed, the Board lacked the authority to grant the relief sought.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationStipulated Awardclerical errorLabor Code § 5804continuing jurisdictiondate of injuryAgreed Medical Examiner (AME)permanent disabilitymedical treatment
References
4
Case No. ADJ9 088743
Regular
Jan 26, 2016

LEO ESTRELLA vs. MILWAUKEE BREWERS, SAN FRANCISCO GIANTS, ACE USA

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Leo Estrella's petition for reconsideration, upholding the administrative law judge's finding that his cumulative injury claim against the Milwaukee Brewers and San Francisco Giants was time-barred by the one-year statute of limitations. The Board found that applicant knew or should have known of his right to file a claim more than one year prior to filing, precluding application of the five-year "new and further disability" statute. Applicant's contention that the statute of limitations was tolled due to lack of knowledge was rejected, as the evidence indicated he was aware of the industrial causation of his injuries by 2009. One commissioner dissented, arguing the date of injury should be 2013 and that defendants failed to prove applicant's knowledge of his rights or the statute of limitations.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCumulative InjuryStatute of LimitationsLabor Code Section 5405Labor Code Section 5410New and Further DisabilityTollingDate of InjuryIndustrial CausationProfessional Baseball Player
References
14
Case No. ADJ7811907
Regular
Jul 10, 2017

KYLE PIKE vs. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the County of San Diego's petition for reconsideration, affirming an award of temporary disability and salary continuation benefits to Kyle Pike. Despite the benefits extending beyond five years from the injury date, the Board found applicant's temporary disability commenced within that period and was limited to 104 weeks. This decision aligns with a judicial interpretation that allows such awards when a timely petition to reopen is filed and benefits begin within the statutory five-year window. The dissenting opinion argued that Labor Code section 4656(c)(2) strictly prohibits temporary disability payments beyond five years from the injury date for injuries after January 1, 2008.

Labor Code section 4850temporary disability benefitsPetition to ReopenLabor Code section 4656(c)(2)five-year limitation104 weeksDeputy Sheriff Detentiondate of injurycontinuing jurisdictionnew and further disability
References
10
Showing 1-10 of 4,524 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational