CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ10763960
Regular
May 20, 2019

DENNIS ROMERO vs. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

This case involves a workers' compensation appeal where the defendant, County of San Diego, sought reconsideration of an award granting the applicant, Dennis Romero, permanent disability. The defendant argued that the administrative law judge improperly overlapped factors of disability when assessing the applicant's $94\%$ permanent disability rating. The Appeals Board denied reconsideration, adopting the judge's report which found that the qualified medical evaluator considered factors beyond shortness of breath, such as left ventricular hypertrophy and lightheadedness, when determining impairments for hypertensive and coronary heart disease. The Board also cited legal precedent that the multiple disabilities rating schedule accounts for any overlap.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationFindings Award and OrderDeputy SheriffIndustrial InjuryHeart InjuryHypertensionPermanent DisabilityHypertensive Heart DiseaseCoronary Heart Disease
References
Case No. ADJ6456347
Regular
Jan 30, 2012

MARK WILLIAMS vs. CITY OF PASADENA

This case involves a police officer claiming industrial injury to his heart due to hypertensive heart disease, a condition he argued was distinct from previously compensated hypertension. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) rescinded the administrative law judge's decision, finding the claim was not barred by res judicata. The WCAB clarified that while hypertension alone is not considered heart trouble, left ventricular hypertrophy, as diagnosed in the current claim, constitutes a distinct condition. The case is returned to the trial level for further proceedings on other unresolved issues.

res judicatahypertensive heart diseasepolice officerLabor Code section 3212.5heart trouble presumptionleft ventricular hypertrophystipulated awardindustrial injurypermanent disabilityapportionment
References
Case No. ADJ12288761
Regular
Dec 29, 2020

MICHAEL GOMEZ vs. CALIFORNIA INSTITUTION FOR WOMEN, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, STATE CONTRACT SERVICES

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration, upholding a finding of 62% permanent disability for a correctional officer with cumulative trauma. The core issue was whether Left Ventricular Hypertrophy (LVH), found by a QME, constituted "heart trouble" under Labor Code section 3212.2, triggering a presumption of industrial injury. The Board affirmed the WCJ's decision, relying on prior case law and expert medical opinions that LVH, even if minor, qualifies as "heart trouble" for purposes of the presumption. Defendant's arguments that LVH was not "heart trouble" and that medical opinions were contradicted were rejected as insufficient to rebut the presumption.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Institution for Womencorrectional officercumulative traumainternal organshypertensionGERDheart trouble presumptionLabor Code section 3212.2Left Ventricular Hypertrophy
References
Case No. ADJ7464646
Regular
Apr 24, 2017

DONALD THOMPSON vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and increased the applicant's permanent disability award from 22% to 52%. This decision stemmed from the Board's finding that the applicant's hypertension constituted "heart trouble" under Labor Code section 3212.2, a presumption applicable to Department of Corrections employees with custodial duties. Consequently, the hypertension-related disability is not subject to apportionment, unlike the prior award which had applied apportionment. The applicant, a teacher at a correctional facility, is thus entitled to an unapportioned award for his industrial injury.

Labor Code § 3212.2presumption of injurycustodial dutiesheart troubleapportionmenthypertensioncoronary heart diseaseindustrial injurypermanent disabilityLabor Code § 4663(e)
References
Case No. ADJ2335090 (SFO 0510716)
Regular
Oct 07, 2010

YOLANDA SMITH vs. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of a decision finding a deceased deputy sheriff's death to be industrially related due to a heart presumption under Labor Code section 3212.5. Despite the deceased being involved in a non-work-related car accident, the court found the heart presumption applicable, deeming his hypertension a contributing factor to his death. The defendants' arguments regarding the "going and coming rule" and lack of substantial evidence were rejected. The Board affirmed that the presumption, along with medical evidence of hypertensive heart disease hastening death, established the injury arose out of and occurred in the course of employment.

Labor Code 3212.5Heart PresumptionGoing and Coming RuleProximate CauseHypertensionEnd Organ DamageAnatomic EvidenceEnlarged HeartLeft Ventricular HypertrophySarcoidosis
References
Case No. ADJ8240882; ADJ8240881; ADJ8615401
Regular
Apr 21, 2025

ROBERT S. HAPPENY vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE FOR WOMEN

Applicant Robert S. Happeny sustained industrial injuries during his employment as a correctional officer, leading to a finding of permanent and total disability by the WCJ due to his inability for vocational retraining. The WCJ also issued an unapportioned award, concluding that apportionment to nonindustrial factors was not proven. Defendant challenged this decision via a petition for reconsideration, disputing the method of combining disabilities and the reliability of vocational reports. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, affirming the WCJ's determination of permanent and total disability based on vocational infeasibility and the lack of established apportionment, ultimately rescinding the original decision and substituting new findings of fact.

ADJ8240882ADJ8240881ADJ8615401correctional officerindustrial injuryheartpsycheright wristrespiratory systemlumbar spine
References
Case No. ADJ10863775
Regular
Jul 25, 2505

HARBANS SINGH-KALER vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration of a January 17, 2020 Findings and Award. The Board ruled that Harbans Singh-Kaler's hypertension disability constitutes "heart trouble" under Labor Code section 3212.2, thereby exempting it from apportionment under Labor Code section 4663(e). Consequently, the WCJ's decision was amended to reflect this finding. However, the Board deferred the issues of occupational group, permanent disability, and attorneys' fees back to the trial level for further analysis.

Labor Code § 3212.2heart troublehypertensionapportionmentoccupational group 332occupational group 380chief engineercumulative injurypermanent disabilityattorney's fees
References
Case No. ADJ11428234
Regular
Oct 17, 2025

RAMON COLLADO vs. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CENTINELA STATE PRISON

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to study the factual and legal issues in Ramon Collado's case against the California Department of Corrections and Centinela State Prison. Collado sought reconsideration of a WCJ's Findings and Order from July 28, 2021, which concluded he failed to prove an industrially caused heart/hypertension injury between December 20, 2012, and August 14, 2018. The Board found the Qualified Medical Evaluator's opinion on whether Collado's condition was an aggravation or mere exacerbation of prior injuries was unclear and contradictory, failing to constitute substantial medical evidence. Consequently, the Board rescinded the WCJ's decision and returned the matter to the trial level for further proceedings, including the development of the medical record and a determination on the applicability of Labor Code section 3212 presumptions.

Workers Compensation Appeals BoardRamon ColladoCalifornia Department of CorrectionsCentinela State PrisonState Compensation Insurance FundOpinion and Decision After ReconsiderationFindings and Orderworkers' compensation administrative law judgeindustrially caused injuryexacerbation
References
Case No. ADJ8984554; ADJ8984560
Regular
Dec 30, 2020

LLOYD DEGONIA vs. CITY OF TORRANCE

This case involves a police officer's cumulative trauma claim for spinal injuries, heart condition, and skin cancer. The defendant argued the claim was barred by the statute of limitations and that apportionment of disability was not properly addressed. The Appeals Board affirmed the initial findings, holding that the statute of limitations was not a bar because the applicant did not know or reasonably should not have known his disability was work-related. Furthermore, specific statutory presumptions for police officers prevented apportionment of permanent disability to pre-existing factors in this case.

AOE/COEstatute of limitationsapportionmentagreed medical examinerqualified medical examinerpermanent disabilitycumulative injuryactinic keratosisbasal cell carcinomahypertension
References
Case No. ADJ 9123567
Regular
Mar 18, 2016

PHILLIP WARD vs. CITY OF FORT BRAGG

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the City of Fort Bragg's Petition for Reconsideration. The Board adopted the Workers' Compensation Judge's report, which found that the applicant's "left ventricular stiffness" or "diastolic dysfunction" qualified as "heart trouble" under Labor Code section 3212.5. This finding meant the applicant's injury was presumed to be industrially caused, and the defendant failed to rebut this presumption. Therefore, the original award of injury, permanent disability, and medical treatment was upheld.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationDenialPhillip WardCity of Fort BraggPolice SergeantCumulative InjuryHeart TroubleHypertensionLabor Code Section 3212.5
References
Showing 1-10 of 974 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational