CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ2860436
Regular
Dec 02, 2011

HAROLD DAVID WATSON vs. VANCE INTERNATIONAL, NATIONAL FIRE CO. OF PITTSBURGH PENNSYLVANIA

The applicant seeks reconsideration of a prior decision finding the employer's appeal of a vocational rehabilitation benefits determination was timely filed. The Appeals Board upheld its prior finding, determining that the employer filed its appeal on December 11, 2008, which was before the January 1, 2009 repeal of the vocational rehabilitation statute. Because the appeal was timely and the right to benefits was not vested prior to the repeal, the applicant is not entitled to vocational rehabilitation benefits.

Rehabilitation UnitVocational rehabilitation benefitsLabor Code section 139.5Appeal PetitionDeclaration of Readiness to ProceedPersonal serviceService by mailDocument Cover SheetWCAB District OfficeProof of service
References
Case No. POM 248928
Regular
May 12, 2006

MARK MICELI vs. JACUZZI, INC., REMEDYTEMP, INC., AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE CO., CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for RELIANCE NATIONAL INDEMNITY CO., In Liquidation

The Court of Appeal reversed the Appeals Board's prior decision, finding that the special employer's insurance (American Home Assurance Co.) was not "other insurance" available to the applicant. This ruling invalidated the previous dismissal of CIGA and dictated that the case be returned for further proceedings. The Appeals Board, following this remittitur, rescinded the prior consolidation and stay order, denying RemedyTemp's request for dismissal and CIGA/RemedyTemp's request for a new consolidation. Assurance's petition for appeal costs was also dismissed as it was filed with the wrong entity.

CIGARemedyTempJacuzziAmerican Home Assurance Co.Reliance National Indemnity Co.special employergeneral employerother insuranceInsurance Code section 1063.1(c)(9)remittitur
References
Case No. ADJ3860512 (OAK 0238823)
Regular
Feb 18, 2010

, Applicant vs. COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the applicant's petition for reconsideration of a prior findings and order. The dismissal was based on the applicant's submission of a petition that grossly exceeded the 25-page limit set by WCAB rules. Additionally, the petition improperly attempted to appeal existing exhibits already in the record. The WCAB warned the applicant of potential sanctions for future non-compliance with filing rules.

WCABPetition for ReconsiderationDismissalWCJ ReportPage LimitationRule 10845(a)Rule 10232(a)(10)SanctionsLabor Code Section 5813Rule 10561
References
Case No. ADJ14930871
Regular
Nov 03, 2025

Brenda De Leon vs. Robinson Pharma, Inc.; Great American Insurance Company; Cypress Insurance Company

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the petition for reconsideration filed by Great American Insurance Company, a defendant in Brenda De Leon's claim. Great American challenged a July 21, 2025, Amended Findings and Order by a workers' compensation arbitrator regarding the date of injury and liability for contribution from Cypress Insurance Company. The Board found the record incomplete, lacking crucial arbitration proceedings documents and a proper summary of evidence, thus violating due process. The Appeals Board issued a notice of intention to rescind the arbitrator's decision and return the matter if a complete record is not filed within 30 days.

WCABPetition for ReconsiderationArbitrator's DecisionDue ProcessEAMSWCAB Rule 10995WCAB Rule 10914Record of ProceedingsSubstantial EvidencePetition for Contribution
References
Case No. ADJ11110973
Regular
May 23, 2025

Jorge Aragon vs. El Super, Safety National Casualty Corporation, Tristar Risk Management

The applicant, Jorge Aragon, sought reconsideration of a decision denying him a second payment from the Return-to-Work Supplement Program (RTWSP). The Workers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge (WCJ) initially found him ineligible based on Rule 17302(b), which prohibits a second RTWSP payment if the subsequent injury occurs before receiving the previous supplement. The Appeals Board affirmed the WCJ's decision, concluding that the applicant's remedy to challenge the validity of Rule 17302(b) lies with the Superior Court, not the Appeals Board, as the rule is governed by the Administrative Procedures Act. The Board also clarified its jurisdiction to review the WCJ's denial despite RTWSP's contention.

Return-to-Work Supplement ProgramRTWSPSupplemental Job Displacement BenefitSJDBRule 17302(b)Labor Code section 139.48invalid regulationarbitrary and capriciousArticle XIV section 4Administrative Procedures Act
References
Case No. ADJ17569878
Regular
Apr 28, 2025

Marvin Pineda Contreras vs. Southwest Plastering, Inc.; Zenith Insurance Company

Lien Claimant Oracle Imaging Riverside sought reconsideration of an Order Dismissing Lien issued on December 23, 2024, by the WCJ, following its alleged failure to object to a notice of intention to dismiss. Oracle contended it had not received proper notice of the hearing date, attributing this to the Appeals Board not sending notifications to its P.O. Box. The Appeals Board dismissed the Petition for Reconsideration as premature, returning the matter to the trial level for the WCJ to consider the Petition as one seeking to set aside the Order Dismissing Lien. The Board noted that any aggrieved party may seek reconsideration after the WCJ issues a subsequent decision.

Petition for ReconsiderationOrder Dismissing LienLien ClaimantNotice of IntentionFailure to AttendProper NoticeBad AddressReport and RecommendationCompromise and Release AgreementOrder Approving Compromise and Release
References
Case No. ADJ20015360; ADJ20015361
Regular
Feb 27, 2025

PAUL ALVARADO vs. CITY OF LOS ANGELES

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a Findings and Award issued by an arbitrator on June 4, 2024, concerning applicant Paul Alvarado and defendant City of Los Angeles. The Board previously issued a Notice of Intention to rescind due to an incomplete record. Despite subsequent filings, multiple evidentiary documents remain missing, preventing a proper review of the petition. Citing due process requirements and the need for a complete record for meaningful review, the Appeals Board rescinded the original Findings and Award and returned the matter to the arbitrator for further proceedings.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationFindings and AwardArbitrator's DecisionRescindedIncomplete RecordDue ProcessSubstantial EvidenceEvidentiary RecordElectronic Adjudication Management System
References
Case No. ADJ12768897
Regular
Jun 16, 2025

LUCIANO GONZALEZ MENDOZA vs. CARROL AND STRONG BUILDERS, PEDRO PILLAR LOPEZ, SOUTHEAST PESONNEL LEASING COMPANY, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Defendant PL Construction/Pedro Lopez sought reconsideration of a March 24, 2025 Findings and Order by a workers' compensation arbitrator that found them uninsured for an injury to Luciano Gonzalez Mendoza. The Appeals Board granted the petition for reconsideration, citing insufficient notice of case transmission to the parties and an incomplete arbitration record. The Board issued a Notice of Intention to rescind the arbitrator's decision and return the matter for further proceedings if a complete record is not filed within thirty days.

Petition for ReconsiderationRescind Arbitrator's DecisionInsufficient EvidenceUninsured StatusAmbiguity in CoverageImplied-in-Fact ContractEstoppelPublic PolicyLabor Code § 5909Electronic Adjudication Management System
References
Case No. ADJ2592313
Regular
Mar 03, 2011

EUSTORGIO PEREZ vs. WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC., LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE

This case involves a lien claimant, Medishock, Inc., whose lien was denied by the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB). Medishock sought reconsideration, arguing the decision was procedurally improper as they did not receive proper notice of a hearing where their lien was adjudicated. The WCAB granted reconsideration, finding Medishock lacked adequate notice and a full opportunity to present its case. Consequently, the WCAB rescinded the original decision and returned the matter for further proceedings to allow Medishock to present its evidence.

Lien claimantMedical Provider NetworkMPNFindings and OrdersF&OAppeals Board Rule 10562Notice of IntentNITMinutes of HearingMOH
References
Case No. ADJ2419683
Regular
Dec 03, 2012

HECTOR VICHEZ vs. AARON BROTHERS ART MARTS, BROADSPIRE FOR AMERICAN MOTORIST INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the lien claimant's petition for reconsideration and issued a notice of intention to impose sanctions. This action stems from the lien claimant and their representatives' failure to appear at a properly noticed trial and subsequent filing of a petition for reconsideration without acknowledging this critical omission. The Board found their actions to be frivolous, intended to cause delay, and constituted misrepresentations to the Board. Sanctions of up to $2,500, plus attorney fees and costs, may be imposed jointly and severally against the lien claimant and his representatives if they fail to demonstrate good cause to the contrary.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardLien ClaimantPetition for ReconsiderationFindings and OrderDue ProcessSanctionsBad Faith ActionsFrivolous TacticsUnnecessary DelayLabor Code
References
Showing 1-10 of 2,377 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational