CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ7673518, ADJ7647749
Regular
Jan 23, 2015

ANA DE AYALA vs. AO-THE UNIVERSITY CORPORATION / CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and reversed a prior ruling, finding the applicant sustained industrial injury to her neck. While the applicant testified to injuring her neck in a workplace incident and this was partially corroborated, the Board found insufficient evidence for other claimed injuries. The Board specifically disagreed with the administrative law judge's credibility assessment concerning the neck injury itself, relying on medical reports and testimony supporting the neck injury claim. The Board affirmed the denial of claims for all other alleged injuries, finding insufficient medical evidence to link them to the incident.

Petition for ReconsiderationFindings and OrderIndustrial InjuryNeck InjuryBack InjurySpine InjuryUpper ExtremitiesPsycheGastroesophageal SystemInternal System
References
Case No. ADJ7500183
Regular
Oct 07, 2014

RAMON MARTIN vs. BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES, INC.

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied defendant's petition for reconsideration, finding it frivolous and filed in bad faith. The Board imposed a $750 sanction against defendant's attorneys, Tricia Pride and Hinshaw & Culbertson, LLP. This sanction was for falsely asserting judicial misconduct by the judge in the petition. The attorneys' subsequent response failed to adequately explain or apologize for their conduct.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardRemovalSanctionFrivolous PetitionBad-Faith ConductJudicial MisconductCode of Judicial EthicsLabor Code Section 123.6Industrial InjuryLeft Knee Surgery
References
Case No. ADJ3907382 (AHM 0133851)
Regular
Aug 28, 2009

Mayekal andREW WAGNER vs. WALMART, AVIZENT BENTONVILLE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the lien claimant's petition for reconsideration because it was not verified as required by law. The applicant's own petition, initially filed as a complaint against the judge, was also denied due to its lack of specificity regarding grounds and supporting evidence. The Board noted the applicant may have intended to file a judicial ethics complaint instead. Therefore, both petitions were ultimately rejected, upholding the original June 12, 2009 Findings, Award, and Orders.

Lien claimantPetition for reconsiderationVerified petitionLabor Code section 5902Judicial ethics complaintComplaint About a Workers' Compensation Administrative Law JudgeWCJFindings Award and OrdersUnlawful or unjustMaterial evidence
References
Case No. ADJ7897857
Regular
Feb 29, 2012

ALFONSO PONCE DE LEON vs. BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES, CORVEL INSURANCE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration and rescinded a trial judge's order allowing applicant treatment outside the defendant's Medical Provider Network (MPN). The WCAB found the judge improperly investigated the facts himself, violating judicial ethics. The evidence gathered by the judge did not definitively prove MPN non-compliance, and the judge failed to contact all listed physicians. Therefore, the case was returned for a new hearing where parties must present their own evidence regarding MPN physician availability.

MPNMedical Provider NetworkWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardWCJReconsiderationAccess StandardsRegular PhysicianIndustrial InjuryOrthopedic SpecialistExpedited Hearing
References
Case No. ADJ3271362 (LAO 0873186) ADJ665746 (MON 0351716) ADJ6595399
Regular
Jun 07, 2017

MARIA MONTALVO vs. FAA FIRST FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, OAK RIVER INSURANCE, BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESTATE COMPANY, EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPNAY, AMERICAN CLAIMS

A lien claimant petitioned to disqualify the Workers' Compensation Judge (WCJ) because her husband previously represented a defendant in these matters for three years. The Appeals Board granted the petition, finding that the WCJ's husband's prior involvement creates an appearance of impropriety, regardless of his actual level of participation. This appearance of bias, coupled with the possibility that the husband could be a material witness, necessitates reassignment to another WCJ to ensure impartiality. The Board cited due process requirements and judicial ethics regarding the appearance of fairness in administrative proceedings.

Petition for DisqualificationWCJ impartialityappearance of improprietyspouse attorneymaterial witnessCanon 3Code of Judicial Ethicsdue processneutral decision makerprior representation
References
Case No. ADJ1717428
Regular
Jul 10, 2017

JERZY PASZKOWSKI vs. SONY CORPORATION OF AMERICA, ATHENS ADMINISTRATORS

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied applicant Jerzy Paszkowski's Petition for Removal and Disqualification. Applicant alleged the Workers' Compensation Judge committed a grave ethical breach by allowing the defense to use a purportedly fraudulent document concerning Dr. Moon's deposition. The Board found no merit to these claims, adopting the WCJ's report which addressed and refuted each contention. Consequently, the petition was denied, affirming the WCJ's prior order regarding the deposition and medical evaluations.

Petition for RemovalDisqualificationJudicial EthicsFraudulent DocumentPetition to QuashDepositionWCJ OrderSubstantial PrejudiceIrreparable HarmWCAB
References
Case No. ADJ9709124
Regular
Jul 12, 2019

FELIPE VERDUZCO vs. JT WIMSATT CONTRACTING COMPANY, AMERICAN CLAIMS MANAGEMENT

This case involves lien claimants ResHealth and Javlin seeking reconsideration of a decision that denied ResHealth standing due to its dissolved corporate status. The Appeals Board has rescinded the prior findings and returned the case to the trial level for consolidation. This consolidation, under the master file *Patricia Valles vs. JIB Holdings I LLC*, aims to address common legal and factual issues concerning ResHealth's liens and potential stays under Labor Code section 4615. The consolidation will ensure consistent rulings, protect due process, and promote judicial economy.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardReconsiderationLien ClaimantsLabor Code 4615Corporate Status SuspensionFranchise Tax BoardConsolidationMaster FileSpecial Adjudication UnitDue Process
References
Case No. ADJ460672 (SFO 0499592), ADJ1224818 (SFO 0499593)
Regular
May 03, 2012

HAMID KHAZAELI vs. SPEDIA.COM INC. and SYSMASTER CORP., GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY

This case involves an applicant, Hamid Khazaeli, who filed a petition with the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB). The petition sought reconsideration, removal, disqualification, and to compel testimony from judicial officers. The WCAB, adopting the recommendation of the administrative law judge, has dismissed Khazaeli's petition. Therefore, the applicant's request for further review and action is denied.

ADJ460672ADJ1224818SFO 0499592SFO 0499593Spedia.com Inc.Sysmaster Corp.Great American Insurance CompanyPetition for ReconsiderationPetition for RemovalDisqualification
References
Case No. SFO 0471491
Regular
May 17, 2008

Leonard Desmuke vs. Marine Terminals Corp., Majestic Insurance Company

The Appeals Board granted removal, reversing the WCJ's denial of attorney Grimes' petition to be relieved as counsel. The Board found that Grimes had established sufficient cause due to a breakdown in the attorney-client relationship, stemming from the applicant's withdrawal from a settlement and ongoing disputes, despite the applicant's objections. The Board emphasized that the applicant's alleged unwarranted claim or discovery issues could not be substantiated without violating ethical duties of confidentiality.

Petition for RemovalPetition to Be Relieved as CounselAttorney-Client Relationship BreakdownUnwarranted ClaimEthical Duty of ConfidentialityAttorney of RecordWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardAdministrative Law JudgeMandatory Settlement ConferenceIn Camera Hearing
References
Case No. ADJ7623044
Regular
Jun 18, 2012

YOLANDA CRUZ GARDUNO vs. TIDES WHARF BODEGA BAY ROBERT BUGATTO ENTERPRISES, INC.; TRAVELERS INSURANCE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration and Petition for Disqualification. The WCAB upheld the WCJ's decision regarding the applicant's average weekly wage, finding it was based on credibility and insufficient evidence of overtime. The WCAB also found the WCJ acted appropriately in managing the trial and limiting irrelevant testimony, despite the applicant's due process claims. The applicant is pursuing separate claims with the Labor Commissioner regarding overtime earnings.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationPetition for Disqualificationindustrial injuryaverage weekly wagedue processWCJ credibility assessmentlabor commissionovertime incomeinconsistent testimony
References
Showing 1-10 of 402 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational