CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ3692050
Regular
Mar 11, 2011

STEVEN HAULENBECK vs. CITY OF ANAHEIM

This case concerns an applicant seeking reconsideration of a denial for lumbar spinal decompression therapy. The Appeals Board previously reversed a WCJ's award of this treatment, finding the applicant failed to follow proper utilization review (UR) and dispute resolution procedures. Although the applicant argued that the prior decision incorrectly applied a statute not applicable to pre-2005 injuries, the Board denied reconsideration. The Board determined that even under the applicable pre-2005 law, the applicant failed to timely object to the UR denial and initiate the required dispute resolution process. Therefore, the requested medical treatment was not authorized.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationLumbar spinal decompression therapyIndustrial injuryKnee injuryPolice officerPermanent disabilityCompensable consequenceUtilization reviewLabor Code section 4062.2
References
3
Case No. ADJ10679103
Regular
Dec 14, 2017

LARRY SYKES vs. THE ANSCHUTZ CORPORATION, STARR INDEMNITY & LIABILITY COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of a prior finding of industrial injury to the applicant's lumbar spine. The Board found that the existing medical reporting from Dr. Hong, Dr. Jamasbi, and the PQME Dr. Schofferman did not constitute substantial evidence to support this lumbar spine injury finding. Therefore, the case is returned to the trial level to develop the record further on the lumbar spine injury issue.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationIndustrial InjuryCervical SpineThoracic SpineLumbar SpineStagehandSecurity OfficerMedical Treatment RecordsSubstantial Evidence
References
0
Case No. ADJ10384099
Regular
Jan 29, 2018

RODOLFO RODRIGUEZ vs. ROBERT BOSCH AFTERMARKET DIVISION, ZURICH NORTH AMERICA

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration to amend the finding of fact, clarifying that the applicant sustained a compensable injury to his lumbar spine arising out of and occurring within the course of employment. While medical evidence supported the lumbar spine injury, the Board deferred the issue of lower extremities as an injured body part for further development. This decision affirmed the original finding regarding the lumbar spine, based on applicant's credible testimony and medical opinions from Drs. Hutchinson and Schaffzin.

AOE/COELumbar spineLower extremitiesPetition for ReconsiderationFinding of FactWCJMedical evidencePreexisting conditionAggravationLighting up
References
14
Case No. AD10769216
Regular
Dec 13, 2019

Richard Hovannisian vs. UCLA, Permissibly Self-Insured, Administered By SEDGWICK CMS

The WCAB granted reconsideration and deferred issues of lumbar spine injury and permanent disability from a prior award. The WCJ's decision relied on a QME report that failed to establish industrial causation for the lumbar spine injury and lacked sufficient explanation for departing from AMA Guides methodology for permanent disability ratings. The Board found these deficiencies meant the decision was not based on substantial medical evidence. Further proceedings are required for the QME to adequately address causation, rating methodology, and lumbar spine classification.

WCABPetition for ReconsiderationFindings of Fact & Awardindustrial injurylumbar spinepermanent disabilitysubstantial medical evidencedue processDisability Evaluation Unitpanel qualified medical evaluator
References
4
Case No. ADJ11027267
Regular
Feb 03, 2023

LUIS ROSALES vs. IRELAND TILE AND STONE INC., SEDGWICK 14779 SAN DIEGO

This case involves an injured tile setter, Luis Rosales, who claimed lumbar radiculopathy stemming from an admitted industrial lumbar contusion. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of a prior order, upholding a finding of 0% permanent disability. This decision was based on the Qualified Medical Examiner's (QME) reports, which the Board found to be substantial evidence. The Board specifically rejected the applicant's argument that the QME's opinions were inconsistent, clarifying that the QME found the sacral cyst unrelated to the lumbar contusion, not that the symptoms were unrelated to the cyst.

Petition for ReconsiderationQualified Medical ExaminerPQMEDr. Sonusupplemental reportsubstantial evidencelumbar contusionsacral cystradiculopathypermanent disability
References
2
Case No. ADJ8413521
Regular
Apr 13, 2020

STEVEN KING vs. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

This Workers' Compensation Appeals Board case involves applicant Steven King's claims for injury arising out of and occurring in the course of employment, including bilateral shoulders, lumbar spine, cardiac system, hernia, skin disorder, hearing loss, and hypertension. The Board affirmed the finding of injury AOE/COE and the hypertension rating but remanded the case for further development of the record regarding the applicant's lumbar spine impairment. The administrative law judge's prior rejection of the Agreed Medical Examiner's (AME) supplemental opinion on lumbar spine disability was deemed an improper disregard of substantial medical evidence.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationAmended Findings and Awardinjury arising out of and occurring in the course of employmentbilateral shoulderslumbar spinecardiac systemherniaskin disorderhearing loss
References
8
Case No. ADJ3649169
Regular
Feb 14, 2013

BRUCE LIBERTY vs. LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT; Permissibly Self-Insured

This case concerns an applicant's petition for reconsideration of a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) order denying his claim for lumbar spine injury. The applicant alleged a lumbar injury from a physical therapy incident following a compensable cervical and shoulder injury. The WCAB denied reconsideration, adopting the WCJ's report which relied on the Agreed Medical Examiner's (AME) opinion. The AME found no industrial injury to the lumbar spine, citing a lack of contemporaneous evidence and a history of degenerative disc disease. The WCAB determined the applicant's presented "new" evidence was either previously reviewed or unpersuasive, upholding the original award.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationDeniedBruce LibertyLos Angeles Unified School DistrictPermissibly Self-InsuredCase Number ADJ3649169Workers' Compensation Administrative Law JudgeAgreed Medical ExaminerLumbar Spine Injury
References
0
Case No. ADJ13002649, ADJ13002697
Regular
Oct 20, 2025

LORENZO TORRES vs. KOOS MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.; SAFETY NATIONAL CASUALTY COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied defendant's Petition for Reconsideration of a Joint Findings and Award (F&A) issued on July 21, 2025. The F&A, authored by a Workers' Compensation Judge, found that applicant Lorenzo Torres sustained injuries arising out of and in the course of employment (AOE/COE) to his lumbar spine and psyche (ADJ13002649), with the psychological injury not precluded by a good faith personnel action defense, resulting in temporary partial disability and 14% permanent disability to the lumbar spine. Additionally, applicant sustained AOE/COE injuries to his right and left shoulders (ADJ13002697), leading to 3% and 4% permanent disability respectively. Defendant challenged these findings, arguing insufficient evidence for the psyche injury, unjustified temporary partial disability, a lower lumbar spine impairment, and no industrial shoulder injury. The Appeals Board reviewed the matter, including the WCJ's Report and Recommendation, and found the WCJ's conclusions to be supported by substantial evidence. Consequently, the Board affirmed the original F&A and denied the reconsideration petition.

AOE/COEGood Faith Personnel Action DefensePsychological InjuryLumbar Spine InjuryShoulder InjuryTemporary Partial DisabilityPermanent DisabilityApportionmentQualified Medical EvaluatorSubstantial Evidence
References
11
Case No. ADJ7084863, ADJ7380456
Regular
Aug 05, 2011

JAMES LAMB vs. THE KENAN ADVANTAGE GROUP, AMERICAN ZURICH INSURANCE CO.

This case involves a truck driver, James Lamb, who sustained a lumbar spine injury with radicular pain during his employment. The defendant sought reconsideration of the prior award finding injury only to his lumbar spine. Subsequently, the applicant and defendant reached a settlement via a Compromise and Release agreement. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the prior award, and returned the matter to the trial level for review of the settlement.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardKenan Advantage GroupAmerican Zurich Insurance Co.Gallagher BassettJoint Findings Award and Ordertruck drivercumulative periodlumbar spineradicular painlower extremities
References
0
Case No. ADJ11065177
Regular
Apr 09, 2019

FRANK ROMANO vs. PROVIDENCE HEALTH AND SERVICES, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinding a prior award that found 4% permanent disability. The Board found the orthopedist's apportionment of lumbar spine impairment to nonindustrial daily activities to be unsubstantiated. Specifically, the doctor could not identify specific nonindustrial activities causing impairment or link them to the found impairment. Therefore, the Board awarded an unapportioned 7% permanent disability for the applicant's industrial lumbar spine injury.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationPermanent DisabilityApportionmentSubstantial Medical EvidenceMedical OpinionLumbar Spine DRE Category IIWhole Person ImpairmentAMA GuidesMuscle Spasm
References
9
Showing 1-10 of 231 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational