CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ8026817
Regular
Apr 22, 2013

MARIA OCHOA vs. RANGERS DIE CASTING COMPANY, COMPWEST INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration of a decision finding the applicant sustained injury to her respiratory system and psyche AOE/COE. The WCAB rescinded the decision and returned the case to the trial level, finding the medical opinions of Dr. Lipper and Dr. Curtis lacked substantiality. Specifically, the physicians failed to provide clear diagnoses, quantify exposures, or adequately explain causation. The Board noted contradictory testimony from the applicant's supervisor and insufficient evidence to support the initial findings.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardMaria OchoaRangers Die Casting CompanyCOMPWEST INSURANCE COMPANYADJ8026817Los Angeles District OfficeOpinion and Order Granting ReconsiderationDecision After ReconsiderationFindings of FactWorkers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge (WCJ)
References
Case No. ADJ3133261 (VNO 0400017)
Regular
Aug 17, 2010

FELIPE TOLENTINO vs. CONCO CEMENT, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, XCHANGING INC., FREMONT COMPENSATION

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the lien claimant's petition for reconsideration as premature. The WCAB granted the defendant's petition for reconsideration regarding the temporary disability overpayment issue, deferring it for further proceedings. The Board affirmed the WCJ's findings on injury causation and permanent disability but amended the decision to clarify the overpayment issue. Finally, the WCAB issued a notice of intention to sanction defendant's counsel for attaching and citing unadmitted evidence.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardFELIPE TOLENTINOCONCO CEMENTCALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATIONXCHANGING INC.FREMONT COMPENSATIONliquidationADJ3133261VNO 0400017OPINION AND ORDERS DISMISSING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND GRANTING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION
References
Case No. ADJ8423237
Regular
Nov 09, 2016

RUBEN SALINAS vs. MAGALY CORPORATION, AMTRUST NORTH AMERICA

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration, affirming that the lien claimant received due process despite the absence of a formal Notice of Intention to Impose Sanctions. The Board found that the lien claimant had multiple opportunities to respond to the defendant's detailed petitions for sanctions and costs, including a hearing and subsequent amended filings. Therefore, the lien claimant had adequate notice and the opportunity to be heard, satisfying due process requirements.

WCABPetition for Reconsideration DeniedLien ClaimantDue ProcessNotice and Opportunity to be HeardPetition for SanctionsLabor Code § 5813WCJ Report AdoptedSanctions IssueAmended Petition for Sanctions
References
Case No. ADJ332528 (AHM 0104042)
Regular
Mar 22, 2011

ERNEST DANIELS vs. PIEDMONT ENGINEERS, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board imposed a $250.00 sanction against the State Compensation Insurance Fund and its attorney, Maria Frias Callejas. This sanction was issued due to their failure to respond to a Notice of Intention to Impose Sanctions and their violation of the Board's Rules of Practice and Procedure. No timely objection demonstrating good cause was filed. Consequently, they are jointly and severally liable for the payment of the sanction to the Appeals Board.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardSanctionsState Compensation Insurance FundMaria Frias CallejasRules of Practice and ProcedureNotice of IntentionGood CauseTimely ResponseJoint and Several LiabilityAttorney for Defendant
References
Case No. ADJ1884241
Regular
Jun 25, 2013

ANTONIA CERVANTES vs. PRIDE INDUSTRIES, LWP CLAIMS SOLUTIONS, BROADSPIRE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied reconsideration of an order imposing sanctions on lien claimant, Word of Mouth Interpreters, and its attorneys, Gonzales Law Firm. The board adopted the WCJ's report, finding that the lien claimant improperly filed a petition for reconsideration without statutory grounds and attached unnecessary exhibits. The WCJ noted the lien claimant's pattern of conduct, including failure to appear at hearings and improper attempts to withdraw filings, which led to unnecessary litigation expenses. Sanctions were deemed appropriate due to the lien claimant's lack of due care and respect for the venue.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationWCJ ReportEAMSAmended Notice of IntentionRules of Practice and ProcedureDeficient PetitionStatutory GroundsLien ClaimantDeclaration of Readiness to Proceed
References
Case No. ADJ3942275 (LAO 0879499) ADJ4411298 (LAO 0879500)
Regular
Jul 12, 2012

JESUS RODRIGO GUZMAN vs. CHAMPION ARROWHEAD BRASS PRODUCTS, ZENITH INSURANCE COMPANY

This case involves sanctions imposed against Erika Campos and Fred F. Hafezi, M.D., for bad faith actions and tactics. They are jointly and severally sanctioned $1,000.00 payable to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board. Sanctionable conduct included a misdated proof of service and misstatements of fact in a petition, as detailed in the WCJ's report. Neither Campos nor Hafezi responded to the Board's notice of intent to sanction.

SanctionsLabor Code section 5813Opinion and Decision After RemovalMisstatements of factBad faith actionsWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardWCJProof of servicePetition for ReconsiderationNotice of Intention to Issue Sanctions
References
Case No. ADJ6537779
Regular
Nov 29, 2010

FLORENCIO CASTANEDA vs. PICO RIVERA PALLET, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration, upholding the original finding that the applicant was entitled to temporary disability benefits. The Board found the applicant's treating doctor's reports were substantial evidence and that the defendant failed to provide proper notice of the Medical Provider Network (MPN). Furthermore, the Board granted removal on its own motion and issued a notice of intention to sanction the defendant and its counsel for multiple violations of Board rules in their petition.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationMedical Provider Network (MPN)Qualified Medical Examiner (QME)Temporary DisabilitySubstantial EvidenceNotice of IntentionSanctionsLabor Code section 5813Primary Treating Physician
References
Case No. ADJ7138854; ADJ7138875
Regular
Aug 15, 2012

EVA PATRICIA MARTINEZ vs. HEALTHCARE SERVICES GROUP, ZURICH NORTH AMERICAN

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for removal. The defendant sought to strike an order compelling a claims examiner to appear at trial and a notice of intent to sanction. The Board found the defendant failed to demonstrate significant prejudice or irreparable harm from attending the trial. Furthermore, the notice of intent to sanction provided the defendant with due process notice and an opportunity to be heard.

Petition for RemovalAppeals BoardWorkers' Compensation JudgeClaims ExaminerSanctionLien ConferenceCompromise and ReleaseDeclaration of Readiness to ProceedIndustrial InjuryPsyche
References
Case No. ADJ7149085
Regular
Sep 16, 2010

MARTINE MARTE vs. SENECA RESIDENTIAL & DAY TREATMENT CENTER, AIG INSURANCE CO., GALLAGHER-BASSETT SERVICES, INC.

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration of an administrative law judge's (WCJ) order imposing sanctions against the defendant. The defendant was sanctioned for failing to comply with a court order requiring specific responses regarding a Compromise and Release agreement. While the Board acknowledged the defendant's flawed attempt to withdraw the agreement and insufficient initial response, it found the defendant's actions did not rise to the level of bad faith or frivolous conduct warranting sanctions. Ultimately, the Board rescinded the sanctions order, finding the defendant had acted with the intent to remedy deficiencies in the settlement.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardSanctionsReconsiderationCompromise and ReleaseWCJPetition for ReconsiderationOrder Imposing SanctionsReport and RecommendationNotice of Intention to Impose SanctionsFailure to Comply
References
Case No. ADJ6957540
Regular
Aug 19, 2013

GUSTAVO MOTA ARCOS vs. BBQ CHICKEN, THE HARTFORD

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration and rescinded a $1,500 sanction order against Industrial Lien Management, Inc. (ILM) and Trinity Interpreters, Inc. The WCAB found the original sanctions order unclear, lacking sufficient explanation of the grounds for sanctions and proper notice. The case is returned to the trial level, allowing the Workers' Compensation Judge (WCJ) to recommence sanctions proceedings with proper notice and explanation if warranted. The dismissal of Trinity's lien claim remains unaffected by this decision.

Workers Compensation Appeals BoardIndustrial Lien ManagementTrinity InterpretersSanctions for Failure to AppearPetition for ReconsiderationOrder Imposing SanctionsWCJ ReportNotice of IntentionShow CauseLien Claim
References
Showing 1-10 of 8,907 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational