CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Jan 03, 2001

Aussie Construction Corp. v. Empire Insurance

This case involves an appeal regarding a plaintiff's claim of overpayment for a general liability insurance policy provided by the defendant. The Supreme Court, New York County, initially granted partial summary judgment to the plaintiff, awarding $37,341, allowed amendment of the complaint, but also granted the defendant's cross-motion to dismiss. On appeal, the court unanimously modified the decision, increasing the plaintiff's award to $39,341 due to an acknowledged inadvertent error in the initial motion papers. The appellate court further denied the defendant's cross-motion to dismiss the complaint, citing inconsistency with other rulings. The court also addressed the defendant's claim for a setoff concerning a separate workers' compensation policy, finding insufficient evidence to link the policy to the plaintiff due to distinct entities. The action's transfer to Civil Court for resolution of workers' compensation coverage issues was affirmed.

OverpaymentGeneral Liability InsuranceSummary JudgmentWorkers' Compensation PolicySetoffAppellate ReviewCivil Court TransferInadvertent ErrorEntity IdentificationInsurance Dispute
References
1
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Dovi v. Grand Union Co.

The appeal concerns whether the Workers' Compensation Board erred in limiting a carrier's credit for overpayment to a claimant to one half the value of the continuing award. The carrier argued for full reimbursement or the right to pursue a common-law action for unjust enrichment due to a $14,000 overpayment made between 1966 and 1974. The court noted that the Workers' Compensation Law supersedes common-law rights and, citing section 22, affirmed that the Board has discretion in determining the manner of rectifying overpayments. The Board's decision to apply one half of continuing payments against the overpayments was thus sustained, despite the carrier's contention that it knew about the claimant's employment but failed to realize the overpayments.

OverpaymentCarrier CreditWorkers Compensation LawSection 22Board DiscretionUnjust EnrichmentCommon-law RightsReimbursementReduced EarningsAffirmed Decision
References
0
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

KST Realty LLC v. Olatoye

KST Realty LLC, a landlord, filed an Article 78 petition against the New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) challenging NYCHA's decision to deduct Section 8 subsidy payments intended for other tenants to recoup overpayments made for a former tenant, E.M. NYCHA had terminated E.M.'s subsidy effective August 31, 2011, after she was institutionalized, and subsequently recouped $11,630.05 from KST Realty LLC for alleged overpayments totaling $31,907.03. KST Realty LLC sought to vacate NYCHA's determination, recover reclaimed payments, and enjoin future deductions. NYCHA counterclaimed for the remaining overpayments. The court found that NYCHA had a rational basis for terminating E.M.'s subsidy and recouping overpayments according to federal regulations and their HAP contract. Consequently, the court denied KST Realty LLC's petition and ordered a framed issue hearing to determine the exact date E.M. vacated the apartment and the precise amount of overpayments owed by the petitioner to the respondents.

Article 78 PetitionLandlord-Tenant DisputeSection 8 Housing ProgramHousing SubsidyOverpayment RecoupmentAdministrative DiscretionRational Basis ReviewFederal Housing RegulationsHousing Assistance Payment ContractInstitutionalization
References
7
Case No. ADJ7062947
Regular
Jul 11, 2014

ELIZABETH VALADEZ vs. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES/OLIVE VIEW MEDICAL CENTER, TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMENT

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's petition for reconsideration. The Board found the defendant failed to specifically prove the dates and amounts of any temporary disability overpayment, nor provide an explanation for it. Allowing credit for overpayment would have unfairly diminished the applicant's permanent disability award. The unexplained overpayment also deprived the applicant of opportunities to utilize alternative benefits.

Petition for ReconsiderationOverpaymentTemporary DisabilityCreditDiscretionWCABWCJBurden of ProofEquitiesPermanent Disability
References
1
Case No. MON 0328875
Regular
Apr 29, 2008

LUIS I. MORA vs. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CAMBRIDGE INTEGRATED SERVICES (Adjusting Agent)

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to allow the defendant credit for temporary disability overpayments against permanent disability indemnity. The Board found that the overpayment resulted from a delayed medical report, not employer fault, and the credit was not significantly detrimental to the applicant. Consequently, the defendant is now entitled to offset the temporary disability overpayment from the permanent disability award.

Temporary disability overpaymentPermanent disability indemnityCredit for overpaymentLabor Code Section 4909Substantial evidenceMaximum recoveryResidual impairmentWage replacementEquitable estoppelAgreed Medical Evaluator
References
13
Case No. ADJ1315206 (SDO 0327261)
Regular
Jun 25, 2010

Marvin Nelson vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES

This case concerns Marvin Nelson's workers' compensation claim for an industrial injury to his back. The WCAB granted reconsideration to amend the findings regarding temporary disability overpayment. While upholding the denial of a neck injury claim due to insufficient medical evidence contemporaneous with the injury, the Board found no overpayment of temporary disability between August 16-24, 2004. The determination of permanent disability, apportionment, and further overpayments remains deferred pending further medical development.

Workers Compensation Appeals BoardMarvin NelsonState of California Department of Social ServicesIndustrial InjuryBack InjuryNeck InjuryTemporary DisabilityPermanent DisabilityOverpaymentDr. Carl Maguire
References
4
Case No. AHM 0093986 AHM 0116200
Regular
Jan 15, 2008

Dawn Keep vs. CHINO VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER, BROADSPIRE INSURANCE COMPANIES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The applicant sought reconsideration of a workers' compensation award, primarily challenging the permanent disability rating and the employer's credit for temporary disability overpayments. The Board affirmed the permanent disability findings but rescinded the overpayment credit, deferring that issue to allow for determination of the applicant's permanent and stationary date and clarification of overlapping cumulative trauma and temporary disability periods. This action requires the WCJ to first establish these dates before ruling on any potential overpayment credit.

Cumulative traumaPermanent disability ratingApportionmentAgreed Medical Examiner (AME)Escobedo v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.Temporary disability overpaymentPermanent and stationary dateZurich AmericaState Compensation Insurance Fund (SCIF)WCJ Report and Recommendation
References
1
Case No. ADJ12340832
Regular
Sep 14, 2022

JOSE PEREZ vs. VILLA PARK LANDSCAPE, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE COMPANY, APPLIED RISK SERVICES

The applicant sought reconsideration of an award that found industrial injury to his back and entitled him to disability benefits, but also granted the defendant a credit for temporary disability overpayment. The Appeals Board affirmed the award of disability benefits but deferred the issue of the credit for temporary disability overpayment. This deferral is due to the defendant failing to present evidence or provide a clear explanation for the alleged overpayment, and the potential conflict between temporary and permanent disability indemnity purposes. Further proceedings are recommended to determine if the credit should be awarded.

WCABReconsiderationFindings of Fact and AwardIndustrial InjuryTree TrimmerTemporary DisabilityPermanent DisabilityCredit for OverpaymentAgreed Medical Examination (AME)Primary Treating Physician (PTP)
References
12
Case No. ADJ4222945
Regular
Mar 26, 2015

MOLLY EVANS vs. RES CARE OF CALIFORNIA, ACE USA

This case involves a dispute over an overpayment of $734.33 in workers' compensation benefits. The applicant contested the defendant's right to credit for this overpayment, arguing it was a result of paying the attorney fee. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration, rescinded the administrative law judge's (ALJ) prior decision, and remanded the matter for further proceedings. The WCAB found that the issue of the $64.00 discrepancy requires further assessment and that the prior award of credit for the $734.33 overpayment should be reviewed for penalties and interest.

WCABPetition for ReconsiderationFindings and AwardCredit for overpaymentAttorney feeStipulations with Request for AwardPermanent disabilityLabor Code § 4909Discretionary authorityUnjust enrichment
References
6
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Harzewski v. Chater

This is a decision and order from a District Judge reviewing a Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation in a Social Security benefits overpayment case. The plaintiff, as former representative payee for his deceased disabled brother, challenged the Commissioner of Social Security's determination that he was at fault for an SSI overpayment. The Magistrate Judge recommended denying the defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings and reversing the Commissioner's determination. The District Court adopted the Magistrate Judge's findings, concluding that the plaintiff was not at fault and that recovering the overpayment from him would be against equity and good conscience.

Social Security BenefitsSSI OverpaymentWaiver of RecoveryRepresentative PayeeFault DeterminationEquity and Good ConscienceAdministrative Law Judge (ALJ)Magistrate Judge ReportDistrict Court ReviewDe Novo Review
References
25
Showing 1-10 of 239 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational