CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ3872772 (VNO 0546594) ADJ310152 (MON 0351415)
Regular
Nov 05, 2015

HIRAN EDIRIWEERA (Deceased); DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, DEATH WITHOUT DEPENDENTS UNIT vs. SRR, LLC; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Petitioners, alleged partial dependents of a deceased worker, sought to overturn a 2007 Compromise and Release agreement where the insurer paid death benefits to the State's Death Without Dependents Unit, asserting they received no notice. The Board dismissed their petition for reconsideration of the 2007 order due to untimeliness and failure to meet reopening criteria. However, the Board removed the separate, pending death benefit claim (ADJ3872772) to address the petitioners' potential claims for partial dependency, acknowledging prior notification of their existence to the insurer.

Partial dependentsDeath benefitsCompromise and Release AgreementPetition for ReconsiderationOrder Approving Compromise and ReleaseReopeningTimelinessNoticeOpportunity to objectIndustrial injury
References
0
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Hopkins v. Cornerstone America

This case involves former insurance agents, led by Joseph Hopkins, suing Cornerstone America, Mid-West National Life Insurance Company of Tennessee, and United Insurance Companies, Incorporated, for unpaid overtime wages and retaliation under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), breach of contract, and common-law fraud and conversion. The central issue is whether the plaintiffs were employees or independent contractors under the FLSA. The Court found that most plaintiffs, except Chris Fox, were employees based on an economic reality test, considering factors like degree of control, relative investment, opportunity for profit and loss, skill and initiative, and permanency of the relationship. Consequently, the court partially granted the plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment and partially granted and denied the defendants' motion to dismiss or for summary judgment. It dismissed Chris Fox's FLSA claims due to judicial estoppel and dismissed all claims against United Insurance and the plaintiffs' abandoned fraud and conversion claims.

Fair Labor Standards ActEmployee ClassificationIndependent ContractorOvertime WagesRetaliationBreach of ContractJudicial EstoppelEconomic Reality TestCorporate VeilPublic Policy Violation
References
36
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Claim of Gabisch v. J. F. C. Rental Corp.

Martin C. Gabisch died from injuries sustained in a work-related accident on March 28, 1985. His parents, Martin J. Gabisch and his wife (referred to as Claimant Mother), filed a claim for compensation asserting dependency. Initially, a finding of dependence was made, but the Workers’ Compensation Board reversed this, concluding that the claimants were not wholly or partially dependent on the decedent. The claimants subsequently appealed this Board decision. The court reviewed the evidence, noting that the deceased contributed approximately $550 per month to the family income, while the claimant father earned about $3,000 per month. The court determined that the evidence presented did not establish that the claimants were dependent upon the decedent, as they needed to prove they were not independently self-supporting. Consequently, the Board’s decision was affirmed.

Parental DependencyWorkers' CompensationAppellate ReviewFinancial SupportWork-Related AccidentDependency ClaimBoard DecisionAffirmation
References
1
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Wamser, Stewart & Vaughn, Inc. v. Teasley

This Workmen's Compensation case concerns the partial dependency of Mrs. Marie E. Teasley on her deceased son, Thomas Teasley. The son died in an employment-related accident, and the mother, as petitioner, sought benefits based on her dependency. The trial judge found that the son regularly contributed $10 per week to his mother's support, establishing a 15% partial dependency. The defense argued that the mother, employed by the Veterans Administration and earning an adequate wage, was not dependent, asserting the son's contributions were voluntary. The Tennessee Supreme Court affirmed the trial judge's finding, clarifying that actual dependency under the Workmen's Compensation Act does not necessitate proof of lacking basic necessities without the contributions, but rather reliance on contributions to maintain one's accustomed standard of living. The Court concluded that there was material evidence to support the trial judge's factual determination of partial dependency.

partial dependencyparent-child relationshipdeceased employeeincome contributionstandard of livingstatutory interpretationappellate reviewtrial court affirmationemployer liabilitydependency test
References
7
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Fusner v. Coop Construction Co.

This workers' compensation case addresses whether non-resident foreign nationals can qualify as 'dependents' under Tennessee law. The Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's judgment that the decedent employee's parents were 'dependents' but reversed the finding that they were 'actual dependents.' The Court held that the parents were 'partial dependents' because the father, Mr. Diaz, earned some income at the time of the employee's death. The case was remanded for further proceedings to determine the appropriate benefit for the parents as partial dependents.

Workers' Compensation LawAlien DependentsNon-resident NationalsActual DependentsPartial DependentsStatutory InterpretationHearsay ExceptionBusiness RecordsAppellate ReviewRemand Order
References
11
Case No. ADJ6751913
Regular
Apr 23, 2013

EDWIN MORENO (DEC.), ADRIAN AND NELLY MORENO, DEATH WITHOUT DEPENDENTS UNIT vs. CERADYNE INC, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

This case involves the denial of reconsideration for a petition filed by the parents of a deceased worker, Edwin Moreno. The parents claimed partial dependency on their son's income, but the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) upheld the Administrative Law Judge's (ALJ) decision that they failed to prove the required legal standard for dependency. Specifically, the parents could not quantify any monetary contributions their son made to their business or their support. The WCAB also noted a procedural issue with service of the petition but denied reconsideration on the merits.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardDeath Without Dependents UnitPetition for ReconsiderationPartial DependentsDeath BenefitsIndustrial AccidentDependency ClaimSupportChevron USAInc. v. WCAB (Stecle)
References
1
Case No. ADJ7472371
Regular
Oct 19, 2016

GOLDEN DAVE DUBOISE (Deceased); DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS DEATH WITHOUT DEPENDENTS UNIT; PAMELA MEGAN DUBOISE, vs. BLACK ROAD AUTO & TOW; STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND,

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the Department of Industrial Relations' petition for reconsideration. The Board affirmed the finding that Pamela Duboise was a partial dependent of the deceased employee, Golden Dave Duboise. This determination was based on evidence of past child support payments and cash gifts, establishing reliance for her maintenance. The Board distinguished this case from precedents where dependency was based solely on legal obligation without actual contributions.

Death Without Dependents UnitPamela Megan Duboisepartial dependentdeath benefitschild supportarrearageDivorce DecreeArkansas state courtWCJPetition for Reconsideration
References
4
Case No. ADJ9803664
Regular
Dec 04, 2015

JUAN GONZALEZ (Deceased), DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, DEATH WITHOUT DEPENDENTS UNIT vs. CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL DISABILITY & RETIREMENT, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted removal and rescinded a judge's order that stayed proceedings pending the outcome of a probate case. The WCAB determined that probate court findings have limited relevance to determining workers' compensation death benefits and that the WCAB has sole jurisdiction over dependency issues. By staying the proceedings, the judge's order caused significant prejudice to the defendant, SCIF, by hindering discovery and resolution of a potential partial dependency claim. The matter was reset for further proceedings, with parties urged to attempt informal settlement.

Death benefitsDependencyWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for RemovalMandatory Settlement ConferenceProbate proceedingsLabor CodeCalifornia Highway PatrolState Compensation Insurance FundDeath Without Dependents Unit
References
1
Case No. ADJ12616197
Regular
Jan 12, 2022

VANESSA FATZER (Deceased) KATRINA S. HAGEN, Director of Department of Industrial Relations, administrator for Death Without Dependents Unit JOEL STAPLETON III vs. KELLY-MOORE PAINT COMPANY INC., ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, administered by ESIS, INC.

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the prior finding, and returned the case to the WCJ for further proceedings. The Board found that the original decision, which determined Mr. Stapleton was a partial dependent of the deceased, was not supported by substantial evidence. Specifically, the WCJ's credibility assessment of Mr. Stapleton and his father was insufficient as their testimony was solely from deposition transcripts and they were not called as witnesses at trial. The Board emphasized that deposition testimony alone is insufficient to establish credibility for a dependency determination.

Death Without Dependents UnitPartial DependentLabor Code Section 4706.5Dependency DeterminationCredibility of WitnessesDeposition TestimonySubstantial EvidenceFurther ProceedingsReconsiderationRescission
References
17
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Volz v. Southerland

Albert S. Southerland died in an accident while working for a construction company on December 13, 1951. His mother, Hannah Southerland, sought workmen's compensation as a partial dependent. The construction company appealed the Circuit Judge's ruling in favor of Hannah, arguing the accident was not compensable and she was not a compensable dependent. The appellate court affirmed the judgment, concluding there was material evidence to support the trial judge's findings that the accident arose out of and in the course of employment, and that Hannah was a partial dependent of her son.

Workmen's CompensationDeath BenefitsCourse of EmploymentScope of EmploymentAccidentDependency ClaimPartial DependencyEmployer LiabilityCustomary Work PracticeHazardous Work Conditions
References
0
Showing 1-10 of 3,647 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational