CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ8026817
Regular
Apr 22, 2013

MARIA OCHOA vs. RANGERS DIE CASTING COMPANY, COMPWEST INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration of a decision finding the applicant sustained injury to her respiratory system and psyche AOE/COE. The WCAB rescinded the decision and returned the case to the trial level, finding the medical opinions of Dr. Lipper and Dr. Curtis lacked substantiality. Specifically, the physicians failed to provide clear diagnoses, quantify exposures, or adequately explain causation. The Board noted contradictory testimony from the applicant's supervisor and insufficient evidence to support the initial findings.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardMaria OchoaRangers Die Casting CompanyCOMPWEST INSURANCE COMPANYADJ8026817Los Angeles District OfficeOpinion and Order Granting ReconsiderationDecision After ReconsiderationFindings of FactWorkers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge (WCJ)
References
Case No. ADJ3133261 (VNO 0400017)
Regular
Aug 17, 2010

FELIPE TOLENTINO vs. CONCO CEMENT, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, XCHANGING INC., FREMONT COMPENSATION

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the lien claimant's petition for reconsideration as premature. The WCAB granted the defendant's petition for reconsideration regarding the temporary disability overpayment issue, deferring it for further proceedings. The Board affirmed the WCJ's findings on injury causation and permanent disability but amended the decision to clarify the overpayment issue. Finally, the WCAB issued a notice of intention to sanction defendant's counsel for attaching and citing unadmitted evidence.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardFELIPE TOLENTINOCONCO CEMENTCALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATIONXCHANGING INC.FREMONT COMPENSATIONliquidationADJ3133261VNO 0400017OPINION AND ORDERS DISMISSING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND GRANTING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION
References
Case No. ADJ932256 (LBO 0396558)
Regular
Jul 14, 2010

DANIEL MASCORRO vs. PREFERRED PERSONNEL, AMERICAN INSURANCE GUARANTEE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the lien claimant's petition for reconsideration. The claimant, a former attorney, sought reconsideration of an order approving a compromise and release that set aside $1,000 for attorney fees. The Board found the claimant lacked standing as no order had yet been made regarding the division of those fees. Any party aggrieved by a future division order can then seek reconsideration.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationCompromise and ReleaseAttorney FeesLien ClaimantStandingAggrieved PartyLabor Code Section 5900Workers' Compensation JudgeDivision of Attorney Fee
References
Case No. ADJ4387448 (SJO 0267422)
Regular
Mar 11, 2014

BALGOVIND SHARMA vs. LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION, MATRIX ABSENCE MANAGEMENT

The Court of Appeal ordered a supplemental attorney's fee award for applicant's counsel for successfully defending against the defendant's petition for writ of review. The Board reviewed the attorney's claimed hours and rate, deeming some time entries excessive and clerical tasks non-compensable. Ultimately, the Board awarded $5,480.00 in attorney's fees plus $47.74 in costs, totaling $5,527.74, and clarified this award is in addition to any compensation owed. The Board also rejected the defendant's argument that the third-party credit applied to this supplemental fee award.

Labor Code § 5801Supplemental Attorney's FeePetition for Writ of ReviewCourt of Appeal RemandApplicant's AttorneyReasonable Attorney FeesHourly RateTime and EffortCase ComplexityClerical Tasks
References
Case No. ADJ302560
Regular
Jan 10, 2012

DAVID COE vs. PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION OF DIVING INSTRUCTORS, MISSION INSURANCE COMPANY, IN LIQUIDATION, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration on its own motion to correct a clerical error in a prior decision regarding a Labor Code section 5710 attorney's fee. The original award of $1,903.75 was twice the applicant's attorney's requested fee of $1,093.75, which the WCJ and the Board's prior decision acknowledged. The Board corrected its decision to reflect the accurate attorney fee of $1,093.75, while reaffirming that CIGA has no liability for this fee due to a credit against the applicant's third-party recovery, which is reduced by the corrected fee amount.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardProfessional Association of Diving InstructorsMission Insurance CompanyCalifornia Insurance Guarantee Association (CIGA)Labor Code section 5710attorney's feeclerical errorpetition for reconsiderationthird-party recoverynet third party recovery
References
Case No. ADJ1497584 (SAC 0370207)
Regular
Jan 01, 2013

ERNEST SURITA vs. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

This case concerns a petition for reconsideration filed by Mr. McKown. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the petition because Mr. McKown was not an aggrieved party by the WCJ's order, as the applicant had already substituted and dismissed him as counsel. Furthermore, the order was not considered final as it did not determine Mr. McKown's entitlement to attorney's fees. Therefore, the WCAB adopted the WCJ's report and dismissed the petition.

Petition for ReconsiderationAggrieved PartyFinal OrderSubstitution of AttorneysNotice of Dismissal of AttorneyAbsolute Right to DismissAttorney's Fee EntitlementWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardAdministrative Law JudgeSubstantive Right
References
Case No. ADJ10065068
Regular
May 02, 2018

JOHN LAMBERT vs. COUNTY OF KERN

This case concerns a supplemental award of attorney's fees to the applicant's attorney. Following the denial of the defendant's Petition for Writ of Review by the Court of Appeal, the matter was remanded for this specific purpose. The applicant's attorney submitted a petition requesting \$9,765.00 for 27.9 hours of work at \$350 per hour in opposing the writ. Without objection from the defendant and after considering the reasonableness of the requested fees, the Appeals Board awarded the full \$9,765.00 in appellate attorney's fees.

Labor Code § 5801additional attorney's feessupplemental awardPetition for Writ of ReviewCourt of Appealappellate attorney's feestime loghourly ratecase-by-case basismerits of appellate work
References
Case No. ADJ4094302 (AHM 0101287)
Regular
Jun 08, 2010

ROBERT STAMPS vs. KENNY-SHEA-TRAYLOR-FRONTIER-KEMPER JOINT VENTURE; AIG SERVICES, INC.

This case concerns a supplemental attorney's fee award for the applicant's attorney, John M. Urban, under Labor Code §5801. The Court of Appeal denied the defendant's petition for writ of review, finding no reasonable basis and remanding for attorney's fees. Applicant's attorney requested $5400.00 for 18 hours of work at $300 per hour, which the Board found reasonable. The Board awarded the requested amount to John M. Urban against the defendant joint venture.

ADJ4094302SUPPLEMENTAL ATTORNEY'S FEESLABOR CODE §5801Court of Appeal Fourth Appellate Districtpetition for writ of reviewno reasonable basisremandattorney's feesapplicant's attorneyJohn M. Urban
References
Case No. ADJ2001631 (LAO 0876091)
Regular
Oct 01, 2010

SALVADOR AGUAYO, JR. vs. AMERICAN GOLF CORPORATION, ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to address an attorney's fee award of $4,500.00. This fee was awarded for services related to alleged prohibited ex parte communications with Qualified Medical Evaluators (QMEs), as per Labor Code section 4062.3. The Board rescinded the award, finding no explicit determination of prohibited communication occurred as the prior WCJ's orders were voided. The matter was returned to the trial level to first determine if prohibited ex parte communication occurred, and if so, to award fees based on incurred costs and attorney fees for related discovery.

Salvador Aguayo Jr.American Golf CorporationArch Insurance CompanyWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardreconsiderationFindings and Awardattorney's feeprohibited communicationsQualified Medical EvaluatorsQME
References
Case No. MON 0290566
Regular
Aug 12, 2008

MARTHA MANRIQUEZ vs. DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER/DEPARTMENT OF WATER & POWER

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration, upholding the administrative law judge's findings that the defendant unreasonably delayed paying a stipulated award, thus incurring penalties and attorney's fees. The Board affirmed the judge's decision to limit the defendant's credit for a third-party settlement to prospective benefits due to the defendant's inaction in pursuing its credit rights after the stipulated award. Furthermore, the Board ruled that the defendant could not apply its third-party credit against the penalties and attorney's fees awarded.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardMartha ManriquezDepartment of Water and PowerLabor Code sections 4650(b)58145814.5Supplemental Findings and AwardPetition for Reconsiderationcumulative traumathird-party settlement
References
Showing 1-10 of 3,946 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational