CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Claim of Baltsavias v. Caldor, Inc.

Claimant sustained work-related injuries in August 1975 and March 1977, leading to a permanent partial disability. The Workers’ Compensation Board apportioned the disability 25% to the 1975 case and 75% to the 1977 case, sustaining awards and an allowance for claimant’s former attorneys. The claimant appealed, arguing for permanent total disability and challenging legal fees. However, the court found these arguments outside the scope of the appeal, noting that prior decisions had established the nature and extent of disability and no timely appeal was taken. Reviewing the record, the court found substantial evidence to support the Board’s factual findings regarding carrier responsibility for medical bills and the average weekly wage. Consequently, the Board’s decision was affirmed.

Workers' CompensationPermanent Partial DisabilityAppealBoard DecisionMedical BillsAverage Weekly WageCausally Related DisabilityTimelinessLegal FeesReopened Cases
References
0
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Claim of Huss v. Tops Markets, Inc.

In 1985, claimant sustained a right shoulder injury while employed by Dunlop Tire, resulting in a permanent partial disability. In 1998, he re-injured the same shoulder while working for Tops Markets, Inc., leading to a new workers' compensation claim. An impartial specialist attributed 85% of the disability to the 1985 injury and 15% to the 1998 injury. Although a Workers' Compensation Law Judge initially rejected apportionment, the Board reversed and applied the 85/15 apportionment. Claimant appealed, contending apportionment was unwarranted due to his disclosure of the prior injury and lack of prior disability symptoms. The Appellate Division affirmed the Board's decision, finding substantial medical evidence to support the apportionment.

Workers' CompensationPermanent Partial DisabilityApportionmentPrior InjuryShoulder InjuryCausal RelationshipMedical Expert TestimonyBoard DecisionAppellate ReviewExacerbation
References
3
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Davis v. Reagan

This consolidated appeal addresses whether permanent total disability can be awarded in Tennessee when an anatomical disability rating is below 16.7 percent. The Supreme Court reconciles conflicting panel decisions, specifically overruling Seiber v. Greenbrier Industries, Inc. The court holds that the limitations outlined in Tenn.Code Ann. § 50-6-241, which apply to permanent partial disability awards, do not extend to permanent total disability claims. The decision affirms the trial courts' judgments, allowing individuals like Vernon Ray Davis and Bessie Lou Rayfield to receive permanent total disability benefits despite having anatomical impairment ratings under 16.7 percent.

Permanent Total DisabilityPermanent Partial DisabilityWorkers' Compensation ActAnatomical Impairment RatingStatutory InterpretationTennessee LawConsolidated AppealVocational DisabilityEmployee RetentionLegislative Intent
References
8
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. Rice

This is a worker's compensation case where the insurance carrier appealed a jury verdict granting total and permanent disability benefits to an injured worker. The worker sustained a low back injury, necessitating a chymopapain injection, and continued employment post-injury, even with increased pay and a more strenuous schedule. However, medical testimony and evidence from safety directors suggested that due to his injury and surgery, the worker was permanently disabled from obtaining similar employment elsewhere, being deemed to have a "Class 4 back." The appellate court affirmed the judgment, emphasizing the liberal construction of worker's compensation laws and that continued work does not automatically preclude findings of total and permanent disability. The court found the evidence factually sufficient to support the jury's finding of permanent total incapacity.

Worker's CompensationBack InjuryLumbar StrainHerniated DiscChymopapain InjectionPermanent DisabilityTotal IncapacityMedical EvidenceEmployment PhysicalsTexas Law
References
5
Case No. 2019-01-0630
Regular Panel Decision
Oct 28, 2020

Ferguson, Anne Michelle v. Amazon.com, Inc.

Anne Michelle Ferguson, an Amazon employee, sought permanent total disability and medical benefits for complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) after injuring her left foot at work in October 2017. Amazon contended that benefits should be limited to a foot contusion and sought a credit for overpayment of temporary partial disability benefits. The Court weighed competing medical expert opinions, ultimately giving greater weight to Dr. Dreskin's diagnosis of compensable CRPS. Consequently, the Court awarded Ms. Ferguson permanent partial disability benefits of $8,858.13 and ongoing medical benefits, including access to a panel of CRPS specialists. However, her claim for permanent total disability was denied as she was deemed capable of sedentary work, and Amazon received a credit for previously overpaid temporary benefits.

Workers' CompensationPermanent Partial DisabilityComplex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS)Medical BenefitsVocational DisabilityMaximum Medical Improvement (MMI)Temporary Partial DisabilityPain ManagementMedical Expert TestimonyFoot Injury
References
5
Case No. 2017-08-0024
Regular Panel Decision
Feb 19, 2020

Thomas, Alisha v. Federal Express Corp.

Alisha Thomas filed a Petition for Benefit Determination (PBD) seeking permanent total disability benefits or additional permanent partial benefits, which Federal Express Corp. disputed. The Court ruled that Ms. Thomas is entitled to increased permanent partial disability benefits under Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-207(3)(B) because she had not returned to work by the expiration of her initial compensation period, and her treating physician, Dr. Melvin Goldin, attributed her condition to the work injury at that time. However, the Court denied claims for additional benefits under section 50-6-242 and permanent total disability, as Dr. Goldin's later testimony revealed Ms. Thomas's condition had evolved beyond the initial somatic symptom disorder, and he could not definitively connect her advanced symptoms to the work injury at the time of the award. The awarded increased benefits totaled $3,379.01.

Permanent Partial DisabilitySomatic Symptom DisorderImpairment RatingRes JudicataMental Injury CompensabilityIncreased BenefitsSocial Security DisabilityTreating Physician TestimonyCausation StandardSettlement Agreement
References
5
Case No. 2015-01-0429
Regular Panel Decision
Sep 25, 2018

Lamm, Terry v. E. Miller Construction, Inc.

Terry Lamm, an employee of E. Miller Construction, Inc. (EMC), filed a workers' compensation claim after sustaining a back injury while lifting an H-beam. EMC denied further medical treatment and temporary disability benefits, alleging willful misrepresentation of Lamm's spinal history and disputing causation. The Court rejected EMC's willful misrepresentation defense, finding no detrimental reliance on the inaccurate health questionnaire. The Court awarded Mr. Lamm permanent partial disability benefits totaling $41,393.97 and future medical benefits, determining that his injury and subsequent disability arose primarily out of and in the course and scope of employment. The decision was based on expert medical testimony, particularly Dr. Kennedy's opinion, which the Court found more credible given Lamm's consistent work history prior to the injury and his inability to work afterward.

Permanent Partial DisabilityMedical BenefitsWillful Misrepresentation DefenseCausationPre-existing Condition AggravationDegenerative Disc DiseaseLumbar Spine InjuryImpairment RatingTreating Physician OpinionEmployment-related Injury
References
7
Case No. 2017-06-1778
Regular Panel Decision
Apr 11, 2018

Demotte, Julie v. UPS

Julie Demotte sustained a workplace injury involving a broken hip and leg in November 2016 while working for UPS. UPS initially accepted the claim and provided temporary disability benefits. Dr. Jason Evans, the authorized treating physician, placed Ms. Demotte at maximum medical improvement and assigned a three-percent whole-person impairment rating. A compensation hearing was held to determine Ms. Demotte's entitlement to permanent disability, temporary disability, and future medical benefits. The Court ordered UPS to provide lifetime medical benefits for Ms. Demotte's workplace injury, but denied her claims for both temporary and permanent disability benefits. The denial of permanent disability was based on the inadmissibility of Form C-30A as proof of impairment, as Ms. Demotte failed to present admissible evidence. Additionally, the claim for further temporary disability benefits was denied due to an earlier overpayment by UPS that exceeded any subsequent amounts due.

Workplace InjuryFuture Medical BenefitsTemporary Disability BenefitsPermanent Disability BenefitsAdmissibility of Medical ReportsForm C-30AForm C-32Impairment RatingHearsayMaximum Medical Improvement
References
2
Case No. OAK 0307233
Regular
Oct 16, 2007

LESLEY MORRIS vs. PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP, ATHENS ADMINISTRATORS

The applicant sought reconsideration of a workers' compensation award, arguing that the five percent permanent disability apportionment was incorrectly applied to the wrong knee and that no prior award existed for her right knee. The Board denied the petition, finding that a prior award for both knees existed, establishing a conclusive presumption of permanent disability. Because the current disability entirely subsumed the prior disability, the Board upheld the apportionment of the five percent permanent disability from the prior award.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPermanente Medical GroupAthens AdministratorsOAK 0307233Petition for ReconsiderationCorrected Supplemental FindingsAward and Orderpermanent disabilityapportionmentLabor Code section 4664
References
3
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Claim of Harrington v. L.C. Whitford Co.

The claimant, a construction worker, experienced a severe exacerbation of pre-existing asthma after exposure to burning lead paint fumes in June 1996. A certified pulmonologist, Richard Evans, determined the exposure caused a permanent and total disability. A Workers' Compensation Law Judge (WCLJ) found an accidental injury causing permanent and total disability, which the Workers' Compensation Board affirmed in August 2001. The employer and carrier appealed, arguing the condition was pre-existing and only temporarily aggravated. The appellate court affirmed the Board's decision, finding substantial evidence to support that the work-site exposure significantly exacerbated the claimant's stabilized asthma, leading to a permanent and total disability.

Workers' CompensationPermanent Total DisabilityAsthma ExacerbationOccupational ExposureLead Paint FumesPre-existing ConditionMedical Expert TestimonySubstantial EvidenceAppellate ReviewIndustrial Accident
References
14
Showing 1-10 of 16,017 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational