CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ3133261 (VNO 0400017)
Regular
Aug 17, 2010

FELIPE TOLENTINO vs. CONCO CEMENT, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, XCHANGING INC., FREMONT COMPENSATION

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the lien claimant's petition for reconsideration as premature. The WCAB granted the defendant's petition for reconsideration regarding the temporary disability overpayment issue, deferring it for further proceedings. The Board affirmed the WCJ's findings on injury causation and permanent disability but amended the decision to clarify the overpayment issue. Finally, the WCAB issued a notice of intention to sanction defendant's counsel for attaching and citing unadmitted evidence.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardFELIPE TOLENTINOCONCO CEMENTCALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATIONXCHANGING INC.FREMONT COMPENSATIONliquidationADJ3133261VNO 0400017OPINION AND ORDERS DISMISSING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND GRANTING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION
References
Case No. ADJ3283274 (VNO 0386537) ADJ4545965 (VNO 0386536) ADJ3421140 (VNO 0347301)
Regular
Jan 25, 2010

BARBARA STRAUSS vs. WEST MARINE, INC., CIGA for RELIANCE in liquidation, TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY, FIREMAN'S FUND

This case involves a clerical error in the caption of a prior Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) order denying reconsideration. The error involved the incorrect assignment of ADJ and VNO numbers to the relevant case numbers. The WCAB is correcting this error to accurately reflect the case numbers as ADJ3283274 and VNO 0386537. This correction ensures proper record-keeping for applicant Barbara Strauss and defendants West Marine, Inc., et al.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardOrder Denying ReconsiderationFindings and AwardAdministrative Law JudgeClerical ErrorCorrected Case NumberADJ NumberVNO NumberReversal of NumbersLiquidation
References
Case No. ADJ10597372
Regular
Apr 13, 2020

KATORIA JONES vs. THRIFT RECYCLING, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration to amend the original Findings, Award and Order. The Board found that the applicant's occupational group number should be 360 (porters and packers) rather than 230 (machine operators and tenders). This amendment was based on the applicant's job duties as a warehouse line loader involving lifting, sorting, and moving boxes. The Board deferred issues of permanent disability and attorney's fees, returning the case to the trial level for further proceedings with the corrected occupational group number.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationOccupational Group NumberSorterWarehouse workerLine loaderPDRSPermanent Disability Rating ScheduleFindings Award and OrderIndustrial Injury
References
Case No. ADJ8812554, ADJ9050566, ADJ8818133, ADJ8818138, ADJ8757878, ADJ8848066
Regular
Aug 26, 2014

SAM FOSTER vs. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied reconsideration of multiple applications filed by applicant Sam Foster against the County of Sacramento. The WCAB adopted the reasoning of the administrative law judge's report in its decision. The Board also admonished applicant's attorney for failing to include page numbering in their filings. Consequently, all petitions for reconsideration were denied.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDPetitions for Reconsiderationadministrative law judgedeny reconsiderationapplicant's attorneypage numberingAnswerdefendant's PetitionFRANK M. BRASSMONNIE G. CAPLANE
References
Case No. ADJ15751788
Regular
Jul 18, 2025

OLGA BENITEZ vs. MISSION FOODS, ARCH INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, INC.

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board issued an order on July 18, 2025, to rectify a clerical error in a prior decision dated May 29, 2025, concerning case number ADJ15751788. The error involved the omission of the case number from the caption of the earlier Opinion and Order Granting Petition For Reconsideration and Decision After Reconsideration. The Board clarified that this correction was made without the need for granting reconsideration, citing that such errors can be corrected at any time. Additionally, an earlier Petition for Removal, related to the same parties, was dismissed on May 29, 2025, subsequent to its withdrawal by the petitioner.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardClerical ErrorOpinion and OrderCase NumberPetition for ReconsiderationPetition for RemovalAdjudication NumberGallagher Bassett ServicesArch Indemnity InsuranceMission Foods
References
Case No. ADJ6461450
Regular
Apr 23, 2012

ANDREW HADDAD vs. SAN DIEGO CHARGERS, GREAT DIVIDE INSURANCE COMPANY c/o BERKLEY SPECIALTY

This case involves a notice of intention to issue sanctions against applicant's attorney, Christopher Ginocchio, and his firm, Leviton, Diaz & Ginocchio, under Labor Code section 5813. The sanctions are proposed due to the attorney's alleged bad-faith actions in his answer to the defendant's petition for reconsideration. Specifically, the attorney cited a deposition transcript not in evidence and failed to comply with evidence citation rules. The Board intends to impose a $500 sanction unless good cause is shown within 15 days.

Labor Code section 5813California Code of Regulations title 8 section 10561bad-faith actionsfrivolousunnecessary delaydeposition transcript not in evidenceRule 10842evidentiary statementsspecific references to the recordexhibit number
References
Case No. ADJ1778428 (VNO 0454872)
Regular
Oct 09, 2013

RAUL DURAN vs. L.I. MARBLE, INC., STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

This case concerns a Petition for Reconsideration filed by Dan H. Kim, M.D. (lien claimant) regarding an order dismissing their lien for failure to pay the required activation fee. The Workers' Compensation Judge recommended denial, finding the lien claimant had proper notice of the conference and previously had the correct applicant name and case number. The Appeals Board adopted the WCJ's report and denied reconsideration, cautioning the petitioner against disclosing the injured worker's Social Security number.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationWCJ reportinjured worker privacySocial Security numberOrder Dismissing Lienlien activation feePinnacle Lien Servicesdatabase discrepancyEAMS file
References
Case No. ADJ20165742
Regular
Jul 18, 2025

DEBRA SILVEIRA vs. FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INCORPORATED

Applicant Debra Silveira sought reconsideration of an April 29, 2025 Findings of Fact and Order, which deemed a Qualified Medical Evaluator (QME) panel valid despite being requested by defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Incorporated, with an incorrect claim number. The Appeals Board granted the petition, rescinded the prior decision, and substituted new findings. The Board ruled that strict compliance with Administrative Director Rule 30 regarding complete and correct claim numbers for QME panel requests is required to ensure due process and prevent conflicting or overlapping panels. Consequently, the defendant's panel (7773036) was deemed invalid, and the applicant's panel (7775940) was declared valid.

QME panel validityincorrect claim numberAD Rule 30due processadministrative law judgePetition for Reconsiderationremoval standardDWC Medical Unitprocedural defectinadvertent error
References
Case No. ADJ9076626
Regular
Jul 17, 2015

CIPRIANO NIETO ROJAS vs. METALS, U.S.A., INC.; ACE U.S.A., Administered by GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, INC.

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted the defendant's petition for reconsideration of a prior decision. This was done to allow the Board further opportunity to study the factual and legal issues presented. All future filings related to the petition for reconsideration must be submitted directly to the WCAB's Office of the Commissioners, not district offices or e-filed. This order ensures a thorough review for a just decision, and prohibits WCJs from acting on settlements while reconsideration is pending.

Petition for ReconsiderationWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardADJ9076626Metals U.S.A. Inc.Ace U.S.A.Gallagher Bassett Services Inc.Opinion and OrderStatutory Time ConstraintsFactual and Legal IssuesJust and Reasoned Decision
References
Case No. ADJ16790828
Regular
Nov 10, 2025

Surinder Singh vs. S Line Transportation, Ajaib Singh Kahlon, Uninsured Employers Benefit Trust Fund

This case concerns Surinder Singh's petition for reconsideration regarding a WCJ's finding that he was not an employee of S Line Transportation. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the petition, rescinded the WCJ's July 15, 2025 decision, and remanded the matter for further proceedings. The Board found the record to be inadequate and inconsistent, citing issues with unauthenticated evidence, unclarified bank statements indicating payments for "yard security guard" services, and the late joinder of Ajaib Singh Kahlon as a defendant. Emphasizing due process, the Board instructed that the record be further developed and the employment status be re-evaluated using the "ABC test" as codified in Labor Code section 2775.

Employment statusIndependent contractorSecurity guardPort of OaklandYard operationsAsylum claimLoan repaymentSubstantial evidenceAdmitted evidenceDeveloping the record
References
Showing 1-10 of 1,418 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational