CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ8026817
Regular
Apr 22, 2013

MARIA OCHOA vs. RANGERS DIE CASTING COMPANY, COMPWEST INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration of a decision finding the applicant sustained injury to her respiratory system and psyche AOE/COE. The WCAB rescinded the decision and returned the case to the trial level, finding the medical opinions of Dr. Lipper and Dr. Curtis lacked substantiality. Specifically, the physicians failed to provide clear diagnoses, quantify exposures, or adequately explain causation. The Board noted contradictory testimony from the applicant's supervisor and insufficient evidence to support the initial findings.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardMaria OchoaRangers Die Casting CompanyCOMPWEST INSURANCE COMPANYADJ8026817Los Angeles District OfficeOpinion and Order Granting ReconsiderationDecision After ReconsiderationFindings of FactWorkers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge (WCJ)
References
Case No. ADJ1595121 (ANA 0369848) ADJ3409041 (ANA 0368368)
Regular
Jul 09, 2018

Victoriano Valadez, Marcos Arellano vs. Progressive Business Corporation, State Compensation Insurance Fund

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the applicant's Petition for Removal as untimely filed. The petition sought to overturn an order relieving the applicant's attorney, which occurred over eight months prior to the filing. While the Board would have denied the petition on its merits had it been timely, it emphasized that the WCJ's prior order relieving counsel was not a final determination of substantive rights. The WCAB also clarified that claims of attorney misconduct and requests for case files must be raised before the WCJ.

WCABPetition for RemovalOrder Relieving Attorney of RecordPetition for ReconsiderationUntimely FilingIncarcerated ApplicantGraiwer & KaplanLLPWithdrawal of CounselProcedural Order
References
Case No. ADJ6733950
Regular
Jul 25, 2012

ANTHONY AVILA vs. MARK EVERETTE DRYWALL CO., EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE CO., AMERICAN CLAIMS MANAGEMENT

This case concerns an applicant's Petition for Reconsideration of a dismissal order. The applicant argues his due process rights were violated because the dismissal for failure to appear was improper since his counsel was present at trial dates. The Appeals Board found that as the applicant was represented by counsel at trial, dismissal was erroneous. The Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the dismissal, and returned the matter to the trial level, also noting the unresolved request for counsel to withdraw.

Petition for ReconsiderationOrder Dismissing CaseWCJdue processMandatory Settlement ConferencetrialMinutes of Hearingrelieved as counselNotice of Intention to Dismiss Casefailure to appear
References
Case No. ADJ2528253 [VNO 0109315] ADJ4079159 [VNO 0110903] ADJ1557998 [VNO 0100061] ADJ1727207 [VNO 0120684]
Regular
Sep 19, 2008

GORDON BERGELSON vs. SPORTSCOACH CORPORATION OF AMERICA, RSKCO

The Appeals Board dismissed the applicant’s petition for reconsideration of the WCJ’s July 15, 2008 order relieving applicant’s counsel. The order relieving counsel is not a final order subject to reconsideration.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for ReconsiderationOrder Granting Petition to Be Relieved as CounselWorkers' Compensation Administrative Law JudgeInterlocutory Procedural OrdersFinal OrderSubstantive RightLiability of PartiesAttorney-Client RelationshipSignificant Prejudice
References
Case No. AHM 0109985
Regular
Aug 04, 2008

JOSE PERDOMO vs. ABC SUPPLY COMPANY, INC., ESIS

This case involves a dispute over a deposition scheduled by applicant's counsel, which defense counsel claims was erroneously set and misrepresented. The defendant sought removal of an order that took the case off calendar, alleging prejudice from applicant's counsel's representations. The Appeals Board granted removal, rescinded the off-calendar order, and returned the matter to the trial level to determine the conflicting factual claims regarding the deposition.

Petition for RemovalOrder Taking Off CalendarAppirionWCJDepositionApplicant CounselDefense CounselVerified AnswerReport and RecommendationTrial Level
References
Case No. SFO 0471491
Regular
May 17, 2008

Leonard Desmuke vs. Marine Terminals Corp., Majestic Insurance Company

The Appeals Board granted removal, reversing the WCJ's denial of attorney Grimes' petition to be relieved as counsel. The Board found that Grimes had established sufficient cause due to a breakdown in the attorney-client relationship, stemming from the applicant's withdrawal from a settlement and ongoing disputes, despite the applicant's objections. The Board emphasized that the applicant's alleged unwarranted claim or discovery issues could not be substantiated without violating ethical duties of confidentiality.

Petition for RemovalPetition to Be Relieved as CounselAttorney-Client Relationship BreakdownUnwarranted ClaimEthical Duty of ConfidentialityAttorney of RecordWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardAdministrative Law JudgeMandatory Settlement ConferenceIn Camera Hearing
References
Case No. ADJ17477426
Regular
Jul 28, 2025

GEORGENIA BROCKS vs. COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES

Applicant Georgenia Brocks filed a Petition for Removal concerning a Stipulated Award, alleging duress. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board treated the petition as one for reconsideration. The Board determined that the petition for reconsideration was premature, as it sought to challenge an interlocutory decision rather than a final order. Consequently, the Board dismissed the petition and remanded the matter to the trial level. The WCJ is instructed to treat the petition as one to set aside the order and to clarify the situation regarding the applicant's attorney's petition to be relieved as counsel.

Petition for ReconsiderationStipulated AwardPetition for RemovalPetition to Set AsideLabor Code Section 590960-day periodTransmission of CaseEAMSFinal OrderInterlocutory Order
References
Case No. ADJ4250427 (MON 0359204)
Regular
Sep 16, 2011

ANA AGUILAR vs. METRO BUILDING MAINTENANCE, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

In this case, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and rescinded an order dismissing applicant Ana Aguilar's claim for lack of prosecution. The Board found that applicant's attorney was relieved as counsel and had lost contact with the applicant prior to the dismissal order, raising due process concerns. The dismissal order was based on a defendant's petition and a notice of intention to dismiss, but the Board found no evidence that the applicant actually received these notices. Therefore, the matter was returned to the trial level to ensure the applicant has an opportunity to be heard.

WCAB Rule 10582dismissal for lack of prosecutionex parte orderdue processlack of noticepetition for dismissalnotice of intention to dismissmotion to be relieved as counselcumulative traumamaintenance worker
References
Case No. ADJ2618825 (SAC 0304473)
Regular
Nov 24, 2010

WILLIAM ROSS vs. GOLDEN STATE EQUIPMENT REPAIR, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration, rescinding a prior order that denied vocational rehabilitation benefits and a supplemental job displacement benefit. The WCAB found the applicant may have been denied due process by the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) who issued the prior order without allowing the applicant to present evidence. While the WCAB agreed the applicant is not entitled to supplemental job displacement benefits due to the injury date, the matter is returned for further proceedings on vocational rehabilitation to determine if any vested rights exist. The WCAB also noted the ALJ erred in relieving counsel without the applicant's input.

Vocational rehabilitation benefitsSupplemental job displacement benefitLabor Code section 139.5Labor Code section 4658.5Date of injuryRepeal of benefitsDue processStatus conferenceOrder relieving counselReconsideration
References
Case No. SAU2545427; ADJ2545427 (LBO 0358993)
Regular
Aug 25, 2025

YOLANDA SABLAN vs. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, ACCLAMATION SANTA CLARITA

State Compensation Insurance Fund (SCIF) sought reconsideration of an order appointing it and Travelers Property Casualty Company of America as joint liaison counsel in a consolidated workers' compensation proceeding. SCIF argued it had minimal lien involvement and lacked statutory authority for the role, citing conflicts with state law. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied the petition, finding SCIF failed to provide evidentiary support for its claims and affirming that SCIF, like any other insurer, has the duty and authority to act as liaison counsel to defend against potentially fraudulent liens. The Board also reaffirmed its jurisdiction to appoint liaison counsel under WCAB Rule 10396, dismissing SCIF's petition for removal and denying its petition for reconsideration.

Liaison CounselJoint Liaison CounselPetition for ReconsiderationWCAB Rule 10396Labor Code Section 5909Consolidated ProceedingLien ClaimantsSCIF AuthorityAnti-Fraud UnitRemoval
References
Showing 1-10 of 776 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational