CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. 15-25-00061-CV
Regular Panel Decision
Apr 02, 2025

Francisca Okonkwo, Administrative Law Judge, Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers' Compensation, in Her Official Capacity and Fort Bend County v. Joshua David Heiliger, Individually, and on Behalf of the Estate of Lauren Brittane Smith, and on Behalf of Death Benefits Beneficiaries Joshua David Heiliger and Emma Destiny Heiliger

Fort Bend County appeals a temporary injunction granted by a Harris County District Court, which prevents discovery of mental health records in an ongoing workers' compensation dispute. The underlying administrative case involves a claim for death benefits by Joshua Heiliger, whose spouse, Lauren Brittane Smith, was a paramedic. Heiliger asserts Smith's mental health condition and stress contributed to her death, thus placing her mental health at issue. The Division of Workers' Compensation's Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) issued a subpoena for Smith's mental health records from her psychiatrist, Dr. John Marcellus. Heiliger bypassed the administrative process by obtaining the injunction in District Court. Fort Bend County argues the District Court erred in interfering with the Division's exclusive jurisdiction and that Heiliger failed to exhaust administrative remedies or demonstrate irreparable injury, as Texas law provides a qualified privilege for mental health records with exceptions relevant to this case.

Workers' CompensationTemporary InjunctionDiscovery DisputeMental Health RecordsSubpoena EnforcementAdministrative Law JudgeExclusive JurisdictionExhaustion of Administrative RemediesQualified PrivilegePatient-Litigant Exception
References
53
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Feb 02, 1984

Krebbeks v. Regan

Petitioner, the widow of a Department of Transportation employee, applied for accidental death benefits after her husband's service-connected death in July 1981. Although her application for accidental death benefits was approved, these benefits were entirely offset by workers' compensation payments, leaving her with no current payments from the State Employees’ Retirement System. Subsequently, petitioner sought a lump-sum ordinary death benefit, which was denied because she was deemed eligible for accidental death benefits, even if offset. This appeal ensued after the denial of her application by a hearing officer and Special Term's concurrence. The court affirmed the denial, citing Retirement and Social Security Law § 60 (a) (3), which states an ordinary death benefit is not payable if an accidental death benefit is payable, with a narrow exception not applicable here.

Accidental Death BenefitsOrdinary Death BenefitsWorkers' Compensation OffsetRetirement and Social Security LawStatutory InterpretationDeath Benefits EligibilityPublic Employee BenefitsAdministrative Law AppealDeath Benefit Offset
References
2
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision
Dec 03, 2003

Beesmer v. Village of DeRuyter Fire Department

In 1975, the decedent, a volunteer firefighter, suffered a heart attack and continuously received workers' compensation benefits until his death in 2002. His claimant applied for death benefits, alleging a causal link between the 1975 injury and his death. A Workers’ Compensation Law Judge (WCLJ) awarded benefits after denying the employer's request for a second adjournment to depose treating physicians, a decision affirmed by the Workers' Compensation Board. The court found substantial evidence supporting the causal relationship between the heart attack and death, noting that a work-related injury need not be the sole cause of death. Additionally, the court upheld the WCLJ's denial of the adjournment, as the employer failed to provide a sufficient excuse for not scheduling depositions or serving subpoenas during the initial adjournment period.

Workers' Compensation Death BenefitsCausal RelationshipHeart AttackCongestive Heart FailureAdjournment DenialTreating Physician DepositionSubstantial EvidenceAppellate ReviewMedical OpinionVolunteer Firefighter
References
5
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Transcontinental Insurance Co. v. Walsh

Nettie Mae Walsh, the surviving wife of William Robert Walsh, filed a suit for death benefits under the workers' compensation act after her husband's death on September 6, 1977. Mr. Walsh had sustained compensable injuries on March 7, 1975, and was incapacitated until his death. Prior to his death, a third-party action for his injuries, filed by Mr. Walsh and his wife against Sears, Roebuck and Company, was settled for $352,000. Defendant Transcontinental Insurance Company, the worker's compensation insurer, intervened in that action and received $52,000 from the settlement. Transcontinental argued that it was entitled to offset the $200,000 net recovery from the third-party action against Mrs. Walsh's current death benefit claim, citing Article 8307, Section 6a, V.A.T.S. The trial court rendered judgment in favor of Mrs. Walsh, finding her total benefits to be $7,891.21. The appellate court affirmed this judgment, disagreeing with Transcontinental's interpretation of the statute, stating that Mrs. Walsh was not a 'workmen's compensation beneficiary entitled to benefits' at the conclusion of the third-party action, as a new cause of action for death benefits arose only after Mr. Walsh's death.

Workers' CompensationDeath BenefitsOffsetThird Party ActionSettlementSurvivor BenefitsTexas LawAdvance PaymentsLegal BeneficiariesCause of Action
References
3
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Claim of Dellauniversita v. Tek Precision Co.

The case involves an appeal from a Workers’ Compensation Board decision regarding a claim for death benefits. Claimant’s husband suffered a work-related injury in 1987 and later died. The claimant, as his widow, filed for death benefits. However, the claimant herself died before the causal relationship between her husband’s death and the 1987 incident could be established. The Workers’ Compensation Board ruled that her claim for death benefits abated upon her death. The appellate court affirmed this decision, citing precedents that claims for death benefits abate if a determination on the merits, such as causal relationship, has not been established prior to the claimant’s death.

Workers' CompensationDeath BenefitsClaim AbatementCausal RelationshipAppellate ReviewProcedural IssuesPrecedentLegal Interpretation
References
3
Case No. 2017-04-0093 / 13763-2017
Regular Panel Decision
Oct 15, 2025

JEFFREY MOLANDS, Administrator, THE ESTATE OF MARSHA MOLANDS v. ACCESS PROGRAM

Marsha Molands, a home health nurse for Access Program, suffered low-back and left-shoulder injuries in 2017. She underwent two back surgeries in 2019 and 2023. Following the second surgery, she developed a wound infection, sepsis, and related complications, leading to her death in April 2024. Her husband, Jeffrey Molands, as Administrator of her estate and sole dependent, sought death benefits, additional temporary total disability (TTD) benefits, medical expenses, and funeral expenses. The Court found that Ms. Molands’s death arose primarily out of her 2017 work injury, largely based on the medical examiner’s testimony that infections from her surgeries caused a "death spiral." Consequently, the Court granted death benefits to Mr. Molands at a rate of 50% of Ms. Molands’s average weekly wage, along with reimbursement for medical and funeral expenses. However, the Court denied Mr. Molands’s request for a lump-sum payment of future death benefits, citing statutory limitations and a lack of "exceptional circumstances." It also denied additional TTD benefits from August 2020 to July 2023, determining that Ms. Molands had reached maximum medical improvement in August 2020. Attorney's fees were awarded to Mr. Molands' counsel.

Death BenefitsWorkers' CompensationMedical CausationSpinal InjurySepsisInfectionLaminectomyFusion SurgeryMaximum Medical ImprovementTemporary Total Disability
References
9
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Travelers Indemnity Co. of Rhode Island v. Starkey

The Travelers Indemnity Company of Rhode Island appealed a trial court's judgment that awarded death benefits to Lynn Edward Starkey and Hazel Dean Starkey under the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act. The case stemmed from Jonathan Starkey's work-related injuries in 1984, for which Travelers paid indemnity benefits until his death in 2001. His parents subsequently sought death benefits, which Travelers disputed, asserting a right to deduct previously paid benefits. The trial court found that Travelers had waived this credit in a third-party settlement agreement. The appellate court affirmed, concluding that the contractual language constituted a waiver of Travelers' rights to an offset and upheld the award of benefits, attorneys' fees, interest, and costs to the Starkeys.

Workers' CompensationDeath BenefitsIndemnity BenefitsThird-Party SettlementContractual WaiverCredit OffsetWage Rate DisputeAppellate CourtTexas LawEvidentiary Sufficiency
References
22
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Claim of House v. International Talc Co.

Arthur House suffered a compensable occupational disease in 1973, resulting in permanent total disability and received workers' compensation benefits based on his 1973 average weekly wage. He died in 1995 from lung disease. His widow, the claimant, filed for death benefits, contending the benefits should be calculated based on the average weekly wage of a comparable employee for the year preceding his death (March 17, 1994, to March 17, 1995). The Workers’ Compensation Law Judge and the Board, however, determined that death benefits should be calculated based on House's average weekly wage from the date of his original injury, April 5, 1973. This Appellate Division affirmed the Board's decision, interpreting Workers’ Compensation Law §§ 2, 14, and 38 to establish that the date of the original injury or accident is the basis for computing both disability and death benefits, not the date of death.

Death BenefitsAverage Weekly Wage CalculationOccupational DiseasePermanent Total DisabilityStatutory InterpretationDate of DisablementAppellate DivisionTalcosisClaimant's Widow
References
6
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Jamal v. Gohel

This case involves an appeal by the New York State Insurance Fund (SIF) from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County. The Supreme Court had granted the plaintiff's motion to extinguish SIF's right to claim a credit or offset against Workers' Compensation death benefits and to compel reinstatement and retroactive payment of these benefits. The plaintiff had initially received death benefits from SIF after her husband's work-related death, and also won a jury award in a wrongful death action against a third party. SIF later asserted a right to a credit or offset against the death benefits for the jury award proceeds, suspending payments, which the plaintiff challenged. The appellate court reversed the Supreme Court's order, ruling that primary jurisdiction for determining the applicability of Workers' Compensation Law, particularly regarding an insurer's right to claim a credit or offset, rests with the Workers’ Compensation Board, not the Supreme Court.

Wrongful DeathWorkers' Compensation BenefitsInsurance FundCredit or OffsetPrimary JurisdictionWorkers' Compensation BoardAppellate ReviewDutchess CountyStatutory RightsDeath Benefits
References
7
Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Claim of Smolicz v. Fitzgerald

Decedent, Frank Koestner, died in the September 11, 2001 attacks while working at the World Trade Center. His former wife, the claimant, filed for workers' compensation death benefits for their daughter, which were initially awarded. Michelle Stabile subsequently claimed entitlement to a portion of these benefits as the decedent's domestic partner, a claim initially denied by a workers' compensation law judge but reversed by the Workers’ Compensation Board, which awarded Stabile benefits. The claimant appealed this decision, arguing that Stabile did not meet the statutory definition of a domestic partner, specifically lacking dependence on the decedent for support. The court found insufficient evidence to establish Stabile's dependence or mutual interdependence with the decedent, despite their engagement and plans to marry. Consequently, the court reversed the Board's decision and remitted the matter for further proceedings.

Death benefitsDomestic partnershipWorkers' Compensation LawDependency for supportStatutory interpretationAppellate reviewFactual questionSubstantial evidenceRemandSeptember 11, 2001 attacks
References
4
Showing 1-10 of 14,112 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational