CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. ADJ8026817
Regular
Apr 22, 2013

MARIA OCHOA vs. RANGERS DIE CASTING COMPANY, COMPWEST INSURANCE COMPANY

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration of a decision finding the applicant sustained injury to her respiratory system and psyche AOE/COE. The WCAB rescinded the decision and returned the case to the trial level, finding the medical opinions of Dr. Lipper and Dr. Curtis lacked substantiality. Specifically, the physicians failed to provide clear diagnoses, quantify exposures, or adequately explain causation. The Board noted contradictory testimony from the applicant's supervisor and insufficient evidence to support the initial findings.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardMaria OchoaRangers Die Casting CompanyCOMPWEST INSURANCE COMPANYADJ8026817Los Angeles District OfficeOpinion and Order Granting ReconsiderationDecision After ReconsiderationFindings of FactWorkers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge (WCJ)
References
Case No. OAK 0293725
Regular
May 22, 2008

MARGARITA CHAVEZ vs. WESTERN NATIONAL PROPERTIES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and rescinded the initial denial of the lien claim by Bay Surgery Center (BSC). BSC's claim for facility fees was initially denied because it allegedly failed to prove it operated as an "outpatient setting" and thus was exempt from needing a fictitious business name permit. The Board found that BSC presented sufficient evidence of its "surgical clinic" license to meet its initial burden, thereby establishing it as an "outpatient setting" for purposes of the lien claim, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the reasonableness of the fees.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardLien claimantOutpatient settingFictitious Business Name permitSurgical clinic licenseDepartment of Health ServicesFacility feeMedical BoardLicensed physicianReasonable fee
References
Case No. LA0 0866858
Regular
Feb 04, 2008

JESUS LEON vs. EDWARD SERVICES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration of a decision that denied a lien claim by SB Surgery Center. The WCAB found that SB Surgery Center was properly licensed by the Department of Health Services as a "surgical clinic" and did not require a fictitious-name permit from the Medical Board. The case was returned to the trial level to determine the reasonableness of the facility fee.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardLien claimantSB Surgery CenterEdward ServicesState Compensation Insurance FundLA0 0866858Findings and OrderPetition for ReconsiderationAdministrative Law JudgeLicensed
References
Case No. SBR 0332538
Regular
Mar 28, 2009

RUBY JONES vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA / DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, PREMIER OUTPATIENT SURGERY CENTER, INC.

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the prior order, and returned the case for further proceedings on the reasonableness of Premier Outpatient Surgery Center's (POSC) $\$16,578.00$ lien claim for surgical services. While POSC was properly licensed as a surgical clinic and did not require a fictitious-name permit, the Appeals Board found the record insufficient to establish the reasonableness of the charged fee, noting a significant disparity between the billed amount and what was paid based on Medicare rates. The Board also rescinded the award of attorney's fees to POSC's counsel, finding no basis for such an award under Labor Code sections 5811 or 5813.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardRuby JonesState Compensation Insurance FundPremier Outpatient Surgery Centerfictitious-name permitMedical Board of CaliforniaDepartment of Health Servicessurgical clinic licenseoutpatient settingreasonable fee
References
Case No. RIV 0037205, RIV 0070473
Regular
Jul 24, 2007

LORRIE AVERETTE vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed a prior ruling that Premier Outpatient Surgery Center was properly licensed and not required to have a fictitious name permit for services rendered. The defendant argued Premier lacked proper licensure and a fictitious name permit, but the Board found Premier met its burden of proof by submitting evidence of its licensure and accreditation. Premier was determined to be an "outpatient setting" rather than a "clinic," thus not requiring a fictitious name permit from the Medical Board.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardLien claimantFictitious name permitMedical Board of CaliforniaOutpatient surgery servicesLicensureAccreditationAmbulatory surgical centersZenith Ins. Co. v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. (Capi)Stokes v. Patton State Hospital
References
Case No. LAO 0878674
Regular
Mar 06, 2008

KARLA BUENO vs. PLAZA DEFENDANT LA RAZA, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration of a decision that barred a lien claim due to the alleged lack of a fictitious business name permit. The WCAB found that while the lien claimant presented a surgical clinic license, the record was unclear about its actual business name and compliance with fictitious name filing requirements. The case is remanded for further proceedings to determine the lien claimant's true name and establish its compliance with fictitious business name laws.

Fictitious Business Name StatementSurgical Clinic LicenseHealth ServicesBusiness and Professions CodeMedical BoardLien ClaimantOutpatient SettingAdministrative Law JudgeReconsiderationReasonableness of Fees
References
Case No. RIV 047525
Regular
Jan 31, 2008

THERESA CASTELLO vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA / DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

This case involves a lien claim for facility services provided by Premier Outpatient Surgery Center. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board rescinded the prior ruling disallowing the lien, finding Premier was properly licensed as a "surgical clinic" by the Department of Health Services and thus not required to possess a fictitious-name permit from the Medical Board. The case is remanded for further proceedings to determine the reasonableness of Premier's billed amount and whether Premier rendered professional services requiring separate licensure.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPremier Outpatient Surgery Centerlien claimantfictitious name permitMedical Board of Californiasurgical clinic licenseDepartment of Health Servicesoutpatient settingfacility feelicensure
References
Case No. LAO 0811779, LAO 0811780
Regular
Mar 06, 2008

ELENA BLANKEVOORT vs. HUNTINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, S&B SURGERY CENTER

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration and rescinded a trial judge's order disallowing a lien claim from S&B Surgery Center. The WCAB found that while S&B Surgery Center did have a required "surgical clinic" license, it failed to prove compliance with fictitious business name filing requirements. However, the WCAB returned the case to the trial level for further proceedings, allowing S&B Surgery Center an opportunity to correct this procedural defect to recover on its lien.

Fictitious business nameLien claimantSurgical clinic licenseBusiness and Professions Code section 17910Medical BoardDepartment of Health ServicesBurden of proofReconsiderationWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardOutpatient setting
References
Case No. LAO 0819419, LAO 0819420
Regular
Mar 06, 2008

RUBEN MARQUEZ vs. HOLLYWOOD GLASS COMPANY, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the prior order disallowing the lien claim of S&B Surgery Center, and remanded the case for further proceedings. The Board found that while S&B Surgery Center likely met licensing requirements for its services, it needed to establish proper compliance with fictitious business name statement requirements or amend its claim to reflect its true corporate name. The case is to be returned to the trial level to address these issues and redetermine the reasonable value of S&B's services.

Fictitious Business NameLien ClaimantLicensing StatusSurgical Clinic LicenseBusiness and Professions Code Section 17910Outpatient SettingMedical BoardDepartment of Health ServicesBurden of ProofReasonable Fee
References
Case No. AHM 0082920
Regular
Mar 10, 2008

RAUL REYES vs. DUDDY DRYWALL COMPANY, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

This Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decision denies a lien claimant's petition for reconsideration. The WCAB affirmed the trial judge's disallowance of a medical lien, finding the claimant failed to prove either the reasonableness of its charges or proper licensure for the services provided under the name "SB Surgery Center" on the date of service. The Board held the lien claimant bore the burden of proving licensure and did not meet that burden.

Lien claimantSB Surgery CenterS&B Surgery Centerlicensingreasonableness of chargesburden of proofsubstantial evidenceLabor Code sections 59025904Zenith Insurance Company v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.
References
Showing 1-10 of 328 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational