CompFox Logo
AboutWorkflowFeaturesPricingCase LawInsights

Updated Daily

Case Law Database

Access over workers' compensation decisions, including En Banc, Significant Panel Decisions, and writ-denied cases.

Case No. MISSING
Regular Panel Decision

Feher Rubbish Removal, Inc. v. New York State Department of Labor

The appellate court addressed appeals by the New York State Department of Labor (DOL) concerning judgments that annulled the DOL's determination that prevailing wages must be paid by Feher Rubbish Removal, Inc. and Syracuse Haulers Waste Removal, Inc. for refuse collection, specifically questioning if this applied to private buildings. The court first clarified that the actions were purely for declaratory judgment, not CPLR article 78 proceedings to annul determinations. Interpreting Labor Law § 231 (1), the court found that its plain language and legislative intent did not limit its application to public buildings. Consequently, the court concluded that employers are indeed obligated to pay prevailing wages to employees collecting garbage or refuse from both public and private buildings under municipal contracts. The judgments of the lower court were modified, and declarations were amended to reflect this obligation.

Prevailing WageLabor LawStatutory InterpretationPublic WorksBuilding Service WorkGarbage CollectionRefuse RemovalMunicipal ContractsDeclaratory JudgmentAppellate Review
References
14
Case No. SAC 308622 SAC 308623 SAC 309351 SAC 323463 SAC 355784
Regular
May 09, 2007

DELETTE ZIEGELMANN-JACKSON vs. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

The applicant sought removal to challenge the WCJ's deferral of a ruling on a petition to enforce a subpoena for personal items, arguing it unfairly required a second deposition. The Appeals Board dismissed removal in several cases where no issues were pending, but granted removal in case number SAC 355784. The Board affirmed the WCJ's order deferring the subpoena ruling, allowing for potential further depositions if warranted, and returned the matter for further proceedings.

Workers Compensation Appeals BoardRemovalPetition to EnforceSubpoena Duces TecumDeferred RulingIndustrial InjuryLabor Code Section 132aDiscriminationPrivacyDeposition
References
0
Case No. ADJ1943415 (LBO 0381428)
Regular
Aug 14, 2012

ADALBERTO JUAREZ vs. P.S. STIX INCORPORATED, NATIONAL LIABILITY AND FIRE INSURANCE, BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INSURANCE COMPANIES

This case involves a lien claimant's petition for removal regarding an order to disclose a global settlement with a co-defendant. The Appeals Board found the procedural record deficient, preventing timely review of the removal petition. Ultimately, the Board granted removal on its own motion to address the "procedural morass." The Board rescinded the WCJ's order reinstating a prior minute order and dismissed the lien claimant's petition as moot, allowing for an in-camera review of the settlement agreement.

Petition for RemovalWorkers' Compensation Appeals BoardLien ClaimantGlobal SettlementConfidentiality clauseNon-Disclosure clauseCompromise and ReleaseMandatory Settlement ConferenceWCJOrder Setting Aside
References
4
Case No. ADJ80340084
Regular
Apr 23, 2013

KEITH CRABTREE vs. CITY OF TURLOCK, YORK RISK SERVICES GROUP, INC.

This Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decision addresses a defendant's petition for removal. The Board denied removal regarding the WCJ's continuance of trial to April 29, 2013. However, the Board granted removal and rescinded the WCJ's order compelling the defendant to produce claims adjustor Rebecca Huiras and the claims file without a subpoena. The matter is returned to the trial level for further proceedings.

RemovalWCJContinuance of trialClaims adjustorWitness productionClaims fileSubpoenaRescindedReturned to trial levelDecision after removal
References
0
Case No. ADJ12728611
Regular
Apr 09, 2020

MARTIN JACOBO vs. COKE FARM, RISICO CLAIMS MANAGEMENT

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the defendant's Petition for Removal because the WCJ exceeded their authority by invalidating a Qualified Medical Examiner (QME) solely based on the specialty of occupational medicine for a post-surgical knee evaluation. The Board determined that an occupational medicine physician is appropriately qualified to assess such injuries according to DWC guidelines. Therefore, the WCJ's decision was rescinded, and the case was returned for further proceedings, suspending action on the Compromise and Release agreement pending further development.

Petition for RemovalPanel Qualified Medical ExaminerPQMEOccupational MedicineToxicologyPost-surgical kneeLabor Code section 4062.2(b)Administrative Director Rule 35.5Scope of practiceClinical competence
References
6
Case No. ADJ8033181
Regular
Jun 04, 2013

MARCIA MATTHEWS vs. NEIMAN MARCUS, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

The Appeals Board granted the applicant's Petition for Removal, overturning a prior order to select an Agreed Medical Evaluator. The Board found that the applicant's physician, Dr. Chambi, provided substantial evidence supporting the need for spinal surgery. Conversely, the defense's second opinion physician, Dr. Ma, failed to adequately explain his non-surgical recommendation and his initial report was untimely due to the defense's failure to provide complete medical records. Therefore, the Board ordered the defendant to provide the requested spinal surgery.

Petition for RemovalAgreed Medical EvaluatorRegular PhysicianLabor Code Section 5701Spinal SurgeryNeurosurgical ConsultationUtilization Review DenialSecond Opinion EvaluatorFormer Labor Code Section 4062(b)Expedited Hearing
References
1
Case No. ADJ3589881 (SBR0186633) ADJ2907298 (SBR0185776)
Regular
Mar 14, 2017

THEODORE MOULAS vs. SDA TRANSPORTATION, SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA

The defendant sought removal, challenging the WCJ's order to reopen discovery after trial had begun. The Appeals Board initially dismissed the removal petition as moot, believing the discovery dispute was resolved. However, the defendant asserted the dispute remained unresolved, prompting the Board to grant a new petition for removal. The Board rescinded its prior dismissal, denied the original removal petition without prejudice, and ordered the WCJ to hold an expeditious status conference to clarify the case's status and facilitate resolution.

Petition for RemovalDiscovery DisputeMandatory Settlement ConferenceReopening DiscoveryGood CauseIrreparable HarmMoot PetitionRescind OrderStatus ConferenceExpiditious Resolution
References
2
Case No. ADJ7144283
Regular
Feb 04, 2015

RALPH LOYNACHAN vs. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

This case involved an applicant's petition for removal, seeking to address penalties for delayed treatment, which the WCJ denied due to a pending lien conference. The Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition, finding it failed to meet the extraordinary standards for removal, especially since a status conference request was inappropriate with a scheduled hearing. The defendant's subsequent notice, construed as a removal or disqualification petition, was dismissed as untimely. The Board found the defendant's notice to be without merit, admonishing counsel against future similar filings.

Petition for RemovalAppeals BoardWCJ GutierrezPenalties and SanctionsDelay of TreatmentCatastrophically Injured WorkerPetition for DisqualificationUntimely PetitionLabor Code Section 5311WCAB Rule 10452
References
2
Case No. ADJ6687863
Regular
Nov 09, 2010

BILLY WILLIAMS vs. KAZAKOFF CONSTRUCTION CO., CALIFORNIA INSURANCE COMPANY

The defendant's unverified petition for removal was dismissed for failing to meet verification requirements. However, the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) removed the case on its own motion due to the importance of the venue issue. The WCAB found that venue was improperly transferred to Anaheim due to clerical error, as the applicant resided in Riverside County, the injury occurred in Riverside County, and the applicant's original attorney's principal place of business was Riverside. Therefore, venue was changed back to the Riverside district office.

Petition for RemovalVerified PetitionPetition for Change of VenueLabor Code section 5501.5VenueRiversideAnaheimClerical ErrorDeclaration of Readiness to Proceed (DOR)Mandatory Settlement Conference (MSC)
References
0
Case No. ADJ7802984
Regular
May 21, 2012

DEBRA HARDEN vs. GOLDEN ONE CREDIT UNION, TRAVELERS INSURANCE

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the applicant's untimely petition for removal but granted removal on its own motion due to significant prejudice. The WCAB rescinded a prior finding that granted the defendant's request for a replacement QME due to a claimed conflict of interest. The matter was returned to the trial level for further proceedings to ensure the applicant received due process and a hearing on the conflict of interest allegations. This action was taken to achieve substantial justice given procedural irregularities and potential irreparable harm to the applicant.

Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardPetition for RemovalQualified Medical EvaluatorQME panelconflict of interestdue processadministrative law judgeWCJPetition to Removeuntimely
References
4
Showing 1-10 of 4,722 results

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

CompFox Logo

The AI standard for workers' compensation professionals. Faster research, deeper analysis, better outcomes.

Product

  • Platform
  • Workflow
  • Features
  • Pricing

Solutions

  • Defense Firms
  • Applicants' Attorneys
  • Insurance carriers
  • Medical Providers

Company

  • About
  • Insights
  • Case Law

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust
  • Cookies
  • Subscription

© 2026 CompFox Inc. All rights reserved.

Systems Operational