Home/Case Law/CARLOS CACIQUE vs. METRO PAD & FUSING, OAK RIVER INSURANCE, SOUTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY
Regular DecisionReconsideration

CARLOS CACIQUE vs. METRO PAD & FUSING, OAK RIVER INSURANCE, SOUTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY

Filed: Sep 24, 2014
Los Angeles
ADJ7483398 MF ADJ7117818 ADJ7117817

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns a lien claim by California Imaging Solutions (CIS) for document copying services provided to the applicant's attorney. The original decision disallowed the lien, finding CIS was subject to professional photocopier registration requirements and lacked proof of compliance. CIS argued exemption under Business & Professions Code section 22451(b) as an agent or independent contractor of the attorney. The Appeals Board rescinded the original decision and returned the case for further development of the record to determine if CIS qualifies for the exemption. The stipulated reasonable value of CIS's services is $1,000.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns a lien claim by California Imaging Solutions (CIS) for document copying services provided to the applicant's attorney. The original decision disallowed the lien, finding CIS was subject to professional photocopier registration requirements and lacked proof of compliance. CIS argued exemption under Business & Professions Code section 22451(b) as an agent or independent contractor of the attorney. The Appeals Board rescinded the original decision and returned the case for further development of the record to determine if CIS qualifies for the exemption. The stipulated reasonable value of CIS's services is $1,000.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.