Home/Case Law/Dunn v. Hackett
Regular Panel Decision DecisionRegular Panel Decision

Dunn v. Hackett

Court of Appeals of Tennessee
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

Plaintiffs Theodore Howard Dunn, Sr., and Zelma D. Dunn, appealed the trial court's grant of summary judgment to State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company in an uninsured motorist (UM) coverage dispute. Theodore Dunn was injured while driving his employer's (Holiday Inn, Inc.) van, receiving workers' compensation. The Dunns sued the at-fault driver, Ronnie L. Hackett, and served State Farm, their personal UM carrier. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's decision, finding that Holiday Inn, by not rejecting UM coverage in writing as required by T.C.A. § 56-7-1201(a)(2), had primary UM coverage through Old Republic Insurance Company. The court also ruled that an insurance policy's deductible could not apply to uninsured motorist coverage, thereby concluding State Farm's coverage was secondary.

Dunn v. Hackett is a workers' compensation case decided in Court of Appeals of Tennessee. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Court of Appeals of Tennessee.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Plaintiffs Theodore Howard Dunn, Sr., and Zelma D. Dunn, appealed the trial court's grant of summary judgment to State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company in an uninsured motorist (UM) coverage dispute. Theodore Dunn was injured while driving his employer's (Holiday Inn, Inc.) van, receiving workers' compensation. The Dunns sued the at-fault driver, Ronnie L. Hackett, and served State Farm, their personal UM carrier. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's decision, finding that Holiday Inn, by not rejecting UM coverage in writing as required by T.C.A. § 56-7-1201(a)(2), had primary UM coverage through Old Republic Insurance Company. The court also ruled that an insurance policy's deductible could not apply to uninsured motorist coverage, thereby concluding State Farm's coverage was secondary.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Dunn v. Hackett workers compensation case in Court of Appeals of Tennessee. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Dunn v. Hackett case law summary from Court of Appeals of Tennessee. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Dunn v. Hackett Case Analysis

Dunn v. Hackett is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Court of Appeals of Tennessee. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.